The location of visceral pleural invasion in stage IB patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison and prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

Recently, early-stage lung cancer has been drawing more attention, especially in screening and treatment. Visceral pleural invasion in stage IB cancer is considered as risk factor for poor prognosis. Herein, we aimed to study the distinction between the different locations of visceral pleural invasion.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we summarized 58,242 patient cases that underwent surgery from 2015 to 2018 at Shanghai Chest Hospital. Of those patients, 389 met the inclusion criteria. Patients with PL3 pleural invasion were excluded. The patients were dichotomized into the interlobar pleural and peripheral pleural groups. The outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates.

RESULTS

According to the initial analysis, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were largely balanced. In multivariate Cox analyses, we found that the location of visceral pleural invasion was not a risk factor for prognosis in the overall population (RFS: P = 0.726, OS: P = 0.599). However, we discovered that relative to patients with peripheral pleura invasion, those with interlobar pleura invasion, PL1 invasion, lesions with greater than 3 cm solid components, and those who underwent segmentectomy had a compromised prognosis. Additionally, tumors larger than 3 cm in size with interlobar pleura invasion showed poor prognosis in patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In most cases, the location of tumor invasion did not worsen the postoperative prognosis of stage IB non-small cell lung cancer patients with visceral pleural invasion. However, interlobar pleural invasion still had some potential risks compared to that of peripheral pleural invasion.