Hinderling P H
Department of Pharmacology, Biocenter University of Basel, Switzerland.
Ther Drug Monit. 1987 Sep;9(3):331-6. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198709000-00013.
The goal of the study was to investigate comparatively the performance of the conventional equilibrium dialysis method using artificial membranes (AED) and an alternative equilibrium dialysis method employing biological membranes of red blood cells (BED). The following criteria were employed for an assessment of the two methods: (a) mean estimate of the fraction of drug unbound in plasma, (b) precision, and (c) time required for establishing equilibrium dialysis. For this purpose, plasma protein binding data by AED and BED obtained for several compounds in our laboratory were employed. In addition, suitable results of further compounds on the plasma protein binding by AED and on the partitioning in red cell buffer and plasma systems were collected from the literature, allowing a calculation of the plasma protein binding by BED. Plasma protein binding values by AED and BED were available for a total of 22 nonelectrolytic and electrolytic compounds, including the entire possible range of binding values. Plots of the mean plasma unbound fractions as obtained by AED and BED for the compounds studied could be fitted by a straight line with slope and intercept not significantly different from unity and zero, respectively. Also, the precision of the two methods appeared to be similar. However, the times required to reach equilibrium dialysis were significantly different: With BED and AED, this time span ranged between 2 and 45 and 180 and 960 min, respectively. These results indicate that overall the BED method offers a significant advantage over the AED procedure: It is less time consuming and hence possibly more reliable.
该研究的目的是比较使用人工膜的传统平衡透析法(AED)和采用红细胞生物膜的替代平衡透析法(BED)的性能。采用以下标准对这两种方法进行评估:(a)血浆中未结合药物分数的平均估计值,(b)精密度,以及(c)建立平衡透析所需的时间。为此,采用了我们实验室通过AED和BED获得的几种化合物的血浆蛋白结合数据。此外,还从文献中收集了其他化合物在AED法血浆蛋白结合以及在红细胞缓冲液和血浆系统中分配的合适结果,从而能够计算BED法的血浆蛋白结合情况。AED和BED的血浆蛋白结合值总共涉及22种非电解质和电解质化合物,涵盖了所有可能的结合值范围。对于所研究的化合物,AED和BED获得的平均血浆未结合分数的图可以用一条直线拟合,其斜率和截距分别与1和0无显著差异。而且,这两种方法的精密度似乎相似。然而,达到平衡透析所需的时间有显著差异:使用BED和AED时,这个时间跨度分别在2至45分钟和180至960分钟之间。这些结果表明,总体而言,BED法相对于AED法具有显著优势:它耗时更少,因此可能更可靠。