• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激-反应一致性效应取决于感知证据的质量:一个扩散模型解释。

Stimulus-response congruency effects depend on quality of perceptual evidence: A diffusion model account.

作者信息

Tomkins Blaine

机构信息

Saint John's University, 37 South College Avenue, St. Joseph, MN, 56374, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1335-1354. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02642-9. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-022-02642-9
PMID:36725783
Abstract

Individuals often need to make quick decisions based on incomplete or "noisy" information. This requires the coordination of attentional, perceptual, cognitive, and behavioral mechanisms. This poses a challenge for isolating the unique effects of each subprocess from behavioral data, which reflect the summation of all subprocesses combined. Sequential sampling models offer a more detailed examination of behavioral data, enabling us to separate decisional and non-decisional processes at play in a task. Participants were required to identify briefly presented shapes while perceptual (duration, size, location) and response features (location-congruent/-incongruent/-neutral) of the task were manipulated. The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) was used to dissociate decisional and executive processes in the task. In Experiment 1, stimuli were presented for either 20 or 80 ms to the left or right of a central fixation while response keys were positioned horizontally. In Experiment 2, stimulus size was manipulated rather than duration. In Experiment 3, response keys were positioned vertically. Results showed a duration x response mapping interaction. Participants displayed stimulus-response (S-R) congruency biases only on short-duration trials. This effect was observed for both horizontal and vertical response key mappings. Stimulus size affected participant response speed, but did not elicit S-R congruency biases. The present findings show that when perceptual quality of evidence is poor, individuals rely more heavily on spatial-motor mechanisms when making speeded choice decisions. Furthermore, positioning response keys vertically is insufficient to eliminate S-R congruency effects. Diffusion model parameters are presented and implications of the model are discussed.

摘要

个体常常需要基于不完整或“有噪声”的信息迅速做出决策。这需要注意力、感知、认知和行为机制的协同作用。这给从行为数据中分离出每个子过程的独特影响带来了挑战,因为行为数据反映的是所有子过程综合作用的结果。序列采样模型提供了对行为数据更详细的考察,使我们能够区分任务中起作用的决策过程和非决策过程。要求参与者识别短暂呈现的形状,同时对任务的感知特征(持续时间、大小、位置)和反应特征(位置一致/不一致/中性)进行操控。采用扩散模型(拉特克利夫,1978)来区分任务中的决策过程和执行过程。在实验1中,刺激在中央注视点的左侧或右侧呈现20毫秒或80毫秒,同时反应键水平放置。在实验2中,操控的是刺激大小而非持续时间。在实验3中,反应键垂直放置。结果显示了持续时间×反应映射的交互作用。参与者仅在短持续时间试验中表现出刺激-反应(S-R)一致性偏差。在水平和垂直反应键映射中均观察到了这种效应。刺激大小影响参与者的反应速度,但未引发S-R一致性偏差。本研究结果表明,当证据的感知质量较差时,个体在做出快速选择决策时更依赖空间运动机制。此外,垂直放置反应键不足以消除S-R一致性效应。给出了扩散模型参数并讨论了该模型的意义。

相似文献

1
Stimulus-response congruency effects depend on quality of perceptual evidence: A diffusion model account.刺激-反应一致性效应取决于感知证据的质量:一个扩散模型解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1335-1354. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02642-9. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
The neural correlates of perceptual load induced attentional selection: an fMRI study.注意负载诱导的注意选择的神经相关:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuroscience. 2013 Oct 10;250:372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
3
Perceptual biases in the horizontal and vertical dimensions are driven by separate cognitive mechanisms.水平和垂直维度上的感知偏差由不同的认知机制驱动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Mar;70(3):444-460. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1131841. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.调整对反应冲突的选择性注意——控制知觉冲突、目标-干扰物身份以及与一致性序列效应有关的一致性水平序列。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2531-2550. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02294-1. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying cross-modal associations and their influence on perceptual decisions.跨模态关联的神经计算机制及其对感知决策的影响。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 15;247:118841. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118841. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Response orientation modulates pitch-space relationships: the ROMPR effect.反应取向调节音高空间关系:ROMPR 效应。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2197-2212. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01388-z. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Linguistic and Perceptual Mapping in Spatial Representations: An Attentional Account.空间表征中的语言与感知映射:一种注意力解释
Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;42(2):646-663. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12526. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Attentional origins of the Simon effect: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.西蒙效应的注意起源:行为和电生理证据。
Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:147-59. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.026. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
9
Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.左侧视觉忽视中的多种知觉扭曲及其调节
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(7):1073-86. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00140-2.
10
No evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice.在任务转换练习过程中,没有证据表明任务竞争和注意力调整有所减少。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Mar;204:103036. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103036. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling Conditional Dependence of Response Accuracy and Response Time with the Diffusion Item Response Theory Model.运用扩散项目反应理论模型对反应准确性和反应时间的条件依赖性进行建模。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):725-748. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09819-5. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Moving Beyond the Keypress: As Technology Advances, so Should Psychology Response Time Measurements.超越按键:随着技术进步,心理学反应时间测量也应如此。
Perception. 2021 Jun;50(6):555-565. doi: 10.1177/03010066211012356. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
Are divergence point analyses suitable for response time data?
分歧点分析适用于反应时数据吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):49-58. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01424-1.
4
Internal and external sources of variability in perceptual decision-making.知觉决策中的内部和外部变异性源。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Jan;125(1):33-46. doi: 10.1037/rev0000080. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Comparing fixed and collapsing boundary versions of the diffusion model.比较扩散模型的固定边界和塌缩边界版本。
J Math Psychol. 2016 Aug;73:59-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.扩散决策模型:当前问题与历史
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):260-281. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
7
Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality.指向、注视与按键:反应方式的扩散模型解释
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1515-23. doi: 10.1037/a0039653. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
8
The influence of object location on identity: a "spatial congruency bias".物体位置对身份的影响:一种“空间一致性偏差”。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2262-78. doi: 10.1037/xge0000017. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
9
Looking at a blurry old family photo? Zoom out!看着一张模糊的旧全家福照片?拉远视角!
Perception. 2014;43(1):90-8. doi: 10.1068/p7436.
10
Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model.扩散模型中的参数可变性和分布假设。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):281-92. doi: 10.1037/a0030775. Epub 2012 Nov 12.