Gomez Pablo, Ratcliff Roger, Childers Russ
Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1515-23. doi: 10.1037/a0039653. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
Accumulation of evidence models of perceptual decision making have been able to account for data from a wide range of domains at an impressive level of precision. In particular, Ratcliff's (1978) diffusion model has been used across many different 2-choice tasks in which the response is executed via a key-press. In this article, we present 2 experiments in which we used a letter-discrimination task exploring 3 central aspects of a 2-choice task: the discriminability of the stimulus, the modality of the response execution (eye movement, key pressing, and pointing on a touchscreen), and the mapping of the response areas for the eye movement and the touchscreen conditions (consistent vs. inconsistent). We fitted the diffusion model to the data from these experiments and examined the behavior of the model's parameters. Fits of the model were consistent with the hypothesis that the same decision mechanism is used in the task with 3 different response methods. Drift rates are affected by the duration of the presentation of the stimulus while the response execution time changed as a function of the response modality.
感知决策的证据积累模型已经能够以令人印象深刻的精度解释来自广泛领域的数据。特别是,拉特克利夫(1978年)的扩散模型已被用于许多不同的二选一任务,其中反应是通过按键执行的。在本文中,我们展示了两个实验,其中我们使用字母辨别任务来探索二选一任务的三个核心方面:刺激的可辨别性、反应执行的方式(眼球运动、按键和在触摸屏上点击)以及眼球运动和触摸屏条件下反应区域的映射(一致与不一致)。我们将扩散模型拟合到这些实验的数据中,并检查了模型参数的行为。模型的拟合结果与以下假设一致:在使用三种不同反应方法的任务中使用了相同的决策机制。漂移率受刺激呈现持续时间的影响,而反应执行时间则根据反应方式而变化。