Suppr超能文献

日本应立即启动关于自愿协助死亡立法的讨论。

Japan should initiate the discussion on voluntary assisted dying legislation now.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.

KARADA Internal Medicine Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00886-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No laws or official guidelines govern voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in Japan. A legislative bill on the termination of life-sustaining measures has yet to be sent to deliberations for legislation, due to strong opposition that has prevented it from being submitted to the Diet. However, Japan has recently witnessed several cases involving VAD.

MAIN TEXT

Against this backdrop, we argue that Japan should begin discussion on VAD legislation, referring to the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (VADA2017), which was established in 2017 in Victoria, Australia. VADA2017 puts in place a wide range of stringent safeguards and is considered worldwide to be the safest and most conservative policy on a physician offering assisted dying based on the patient's premeditated request. We consider what opposing opinions from society would arise in response to the VADA2017. Among these will include arguments against VAD itself, those against the validation of this act, and opinions that oppose even the initiation of the dialogue on VAD.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that to protect the right to life among those placed in vulnerable positions and, at the same time, to respect decision-making of those who wish for immediate death due to unbearable suffering, the dialogue must immediately begin with that on introducing a policy more conservative than that of the VADA2017, which solidly considers arguments against VAD.

摘要

背景

在日本,没有法律或官方准则来规范自愿协助死亡(VAD)。由于强烈的反对意见阻止了将其提交给国会,因此终止维持生命措施的立法法案尚未提交立法审议。然而,日本最近出现了几起因 VAD 引起的案例。

正文

在此背景下,我们认为日本应该开始讨论 VAD 立法,参照 2017 年在澳大利亚维多利亚州制定的《自愿协助死亡法 2017》(VADA2017)。VADA2017 制定了广泛的严格保障措施,被认为是全球范围内基于患者预先预谋的请求为医生提供协助死亡的最安全和最保守的政策。我们考虑社会可能会对 VADA2017 提出哪些反对意见。其中包括对 VAD 本身的反对意见、对该法案合法化的反对意见,以及甚至反对开始就 VAD 进行对话的意见。

结论

我们的结论是,为了保护处于弱势地位的人的生命权,同时尊重那些因无法承受的痛苦而希望立即死亡的人的决策,必须立即开始进行更保守的政策对话,该政策要充分考虑对 VAD 的反对意见。

相似文献

5
Implications of psychiatric diagnosis for Voluntary Assisted Dying in Victoria.精神科诊断对维多利亚州自愿协助死亡的影响。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 May;57(5):629-635. doi: 10.1177/00048674231154200. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验