Suppr超能文献

参与医生对维多利亚州自愿协助死亡法规的看法:一项定性研究。

Participating doctors' perspectives on the regulation of voluntary assisted dying in Victoria: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD.

Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2021 Aug 2;215(3):125-129. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51123. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the perspectives of doctors involved with voluntary assisted dying in Victoria regarding the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic) and its operation.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative study; semi-structured interviews with 32 doctors who had participated in the voluntary assisted dying system during its first year of operation (commenced 19 June 2019). Doctors were interviewed during April-July 2020.

RESULTS

Three major themes related to problems during the first year of operation of the Act were identified: the statutory prohibition of health professionals initiating discussions with their patients about voluntary assisted dying; the Department of Health and Human Services guidance requirement that all doctor-patient, doctor-pharmacist, and pharmacist-patient interactions be face-to-face; and aspects of implementation, including problems with the voluntary assisted dying online portal, obtaining documentary evidence to establish eligibility, and inadequate resourcing of the Statewide Pharmacy Service.

CONCLUSIONS

Doctors reported only limited concerns about the Victorian voluntary assisted dying legislation, but have had some problems with its operation, including implications for the accessibility of voluntary assisted dying to eligible patients. While legislative change may resolve some of these concerns, most can be ameliorated by improving the processes and systems.

摘要

目的

调查维多利亚州参与自愿协助死亡的医生对 2017 年《自愿协助死亡法》(Vic)及其运作的看法。

设计、地点、参与者:定性研究;对 32 名在该系统运行第一年(2019 年 6 月 19 日开始)参与自愿协助死亡系统的医生进行半结构化访谈。医生于 2020 年 4 月至 7 月接受采访。

结果

确定了与该法案实施第一年相关的三个主要问题主题:禁止卫生专业人员主动与患者讨论自愿协助死亡的法定规定;卫生和人类服务部的指导要求,即所有医患、医生-药剂师和药剂师-患者的互动必须面对面进行;以及实施方面的问题,包括自愿协助死亡在线门户的问题、获取确定资格的文件证据以及全州药房服务的资源不足。

结论

医生对维多利亚州自愿协助死亡立法的担忧有限,但对其运作存在一些问题,包括对符合条件的患者获得自愿协助死亡的可及性的影响。虽然立法改革可能解决其中的一些问题,但通过改进流程和系统,大多数问题都可以得到缓解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验