Suppr超能文献

主动脉根部替换术中一种不进行冠状动脉开口游离或再植入的替代重塑技术的中期结果。

Mid-term outcomes of an alternative remodelling technique for aortic root replacement without coronary ostial mobilisation or reimplantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Feb 1;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-02051-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compare the early and late outcomes of a modified aortic root remodelling (ARR) technique for aortic root replacement without mobilisation or reimplantation of the coronary ostia, with those of the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed comprising 181 consecutive patients who underwent aortic root replacement with a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure (104 patients) or ARR (77 patients) between January 2013 and December 2019. Primary endpoints included hospital mortality and late survival. Secondary endpoints included incidence of post-operative complications and freedom from late re-operation.

RESULTS

ARR procedures were performed with shorter cross-clamp times and comparable cardiopulmonary bypass times to modified Bentall-de Bono procedures. The incidence of early post-complications was comparable between groups. 30-day mortality was numerically lower with ARR than the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure. Over 7-year follow-up, 4 patients (3.8%) required repeat aortic surgery after a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure, and none after ARR. Long-term mortality after ARR and after modified Bentall-de Bono procedures was 17.1% and 22.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of reintervention on the aortic root/valve was 3.2% after a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure and 0% after ARR. When adjusted for other independent risk factors, late mortality was not influenced by the procedure performed, although competing risk adjusted for age showed that the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure was associated with an increased risk of aortic root/aortic valve re-operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified ARR technique is associated with reduced myocardial ischaemia time, lower post-operative mortality and aortic re-intervention rates compared to a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure. It may be considered a safe and feasible procedure for aortic root/ascending aortic replacement offering good long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

我们比较了不移动或重新植入冠状动脉口的改良主动脉根部重建(ARR)技术与改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术治疗主动脉根部置换术的早期和晚期结果。

方法

回顾性观察研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术(104 例)或 ARR(77 例)治疗的 181 例连续主动脉根部置换术患者。主要终点包括院内死亡率和晚期生存率。次要终点包括术后并发症发生率和晚期免于再次手术的生存率。

结果

ARR 手术的体外循环时间与改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术相当,但主动脉阻断时间更短。两组术后早期并发症发生率相当。ARR 的 30 天死亡率略低于改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术。7 年随访后,改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术后有 4 例(3.8%)患者需要再次主动脉手术,ARR 手术后无再次手术。ARR 和改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术后的长期死亡率分别为 17.1%和 22.7%。改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术后主动脉根部/瓣需要再次干预的累积发生率为 3.2%,ARR 手术后为 0%。在调整其他独立风险因素后,尽管考虑到年龄的竞争风险显示改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术与主动脉根部/主动脉瓣再次手术的风险增加,但手术方式并不影响晚期死亡率。

结论

与改良 Bentall-de Bono 手术相比,改良 ARR 技术可减少心肌缺血时间,降低术后死亡率和主动脉再次介入率。对于主动脉根部/升主动脉置换术,它可能是一种安全可行的术式,可提供良好的长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e12/9890708/5c65f3da3573/13019_2022_2051_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验