Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023 Jul;43(3):523-530. doi: 10.1177/15394492221148985. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
While the COVID-19 pandemic introduced wide expansion of telehealth access in health care, evidence concerning telehealth use in occupational therapy (OT) for cancer survivors remains limited. The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence and perceptions of telehealth services among occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) in oncology. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used to analyze data from a pre-pandemic national survey of OTPs ( = 126) focusing on telehealth. Most OTPs in oncology settings support telehealth use, despite a dearth of access prior to the pandemic. The highest levels of telehealth endorsement among OTPs related to ease of accessibility (48%). Treatments rated as best suited for OT oncology telehealth sessions included education (41%), quality of life/well-being/lifestyle (21%), and psychosocial interventions (19%). These data suggest widespread benefits of telehealth-delivered OT treatment in oncology. Advocacy is needed to ensure the continuation of legislation allowing expanded telehealth access and reimbursement for OT.
虽然 COVID-19 大流行促使医疗保健领域广泛扩大了远程医疗服务的使用,但有关癌症幸存者的职业治疗(OT)远程医疗使用的证据仍然有限。本研究的目的是确定肿瘤学领域职业治疗师(OTP)对远程医疗服务的接受程度和看法。描述性统计和定性内容分析用于分析一项针对 OTP 的全国性调查数据(= 126),该调查主要关注远程医疗。尽管在大流行之前远程医疗的可及性很少,但大多数肿瘤学环境中的 OTP 都支持远程医疗的使用。OTP 对远程医疗的最高支持程度与可访问性的便利性有关(48%)。最适合 OT 肿瘤学远程医疗会议的治疗方法包括教育(41%)、生活质量/幸福感/生活方式(21%)和心理社会干预(19%)。这些数据表明远程医疗提供的 OT 治疗在肿瘤学中具有广泛的益处。需要倡导以确保允许扩大远程医疗服务的使用和报销的立法的延续。