Saunders Ben
University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Public Health Ethics. 2022 Dec 21;15(3):220-232. doi: 10.1093/phe/phac026. eCollection 2022 Nov.
The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has refocused attention on the issue of mandatory vaccination. Some have suggested that vaccines ought to be mandatory, while others propose more moderate alternatives, such as incentives. This piece surveys a range of possible interventions, ranging from mandates through to education. All may have their place, depending on circumstances. However, it is worth clarifying the options available to policymakers, since there is sometimes confusion over whether a particular policy constitutes a mandate or not. Further, I illustrate a different kind of alternative to mandatory vaccination. Rather than seeking less coercive alternatives to a mandate, we might instead employ an alternative mandate, which requires people to do something less than get vaccinated. For instance, we might merely require people to attend an appointment at a vaccine clinic. Whether this mandatory attendance policy is justified will depend on specific circumstances, but it represents another way to promote vaccination, without mandating it. In some cases, this may represent an appropriate balance between promoting public health goals and respecting individual liberty.
新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)大流行使人们重新关注强制接种疫苗的问题。一些人建议疫苗应该强制接种,而另一些人则提出了更为温和的替代方案,比如激励措施。本文探讨了一系列可能的干预措施,从强制手段到教育手段。根据具体情况,所有这些措施都可能有其适用之处。然而,值得向政策制定者阐明可用的选项,因为有时对于某项特定政策是否构成强制手段存在混淆。此外,我还阐述了一种不同于强制接种疫苗的替代方案。与其寻求比强制手段强制性更低的替代方案,我们或许可以采用一种替代性的强制手段,即要求人们做一些比接种疫苗程度稍轻的事情。例如,我们或许仅仅要求人们前往疫苗接种诊所赴约。这种强制赴约政策是否合理将取决于具体情况,但它代表了一种在不强制接种疫苗的情况下促进疫苗接种的方式。在某些情况下,这可能代表了在促进公共卫生目标与尊重个人自由之间的一种适当平衡。