De La Torre-Tarazona Erick, González-Robles Alba, Cascajero Almudena, Jiménez Paloma, Miró José María, Sánchez-Palomino Sonsoles, Alcamí José, Buzón Maria José, García-Pérez Javier
AIDS Immunopathology Unit, National Center of Microbiology (CNM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
J Med Virol. 2023 Feb;95(2):e28543. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28543.
The presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is a major correlate of protection for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Thus, different in vitro pseudoviruses-based assays have been described to detect NAbs against SARS-CoV-2. However, the determination of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 in people living with HIV (PLWH) through HIV-based pseudoparticles could be influenced by cross-neutralization activity or treatment, impeding accurate titration of NAbs. Two assays were compared using replication-defective HIV or VSV-based particles pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike to measure NAbs in COVID-19-recovered and COVID-19-naïve PLWH. The assay based on HIV-pseudoparticles displayed neutralization activity in all COVID-19-recovered PLWH with a median neutralizing titer 50 (NT50) of 1417.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 450.3-3284.0), but also in 67% of COVID-19-naïve PLWH (NT50: 631.5, IQR: 16.0-1535.0). Regarding VSV-pseudoparticles system, no neutralization was observed in COVID-19-naïve PLWH as expected, whereas in comparison with HIV-pseudoparticles assay lower neutralization titers were measured in 75% COVID-19-recovered PLWH (NT50: 100.5; IQR: 20.5-1353.0). Treatment with integrase inhibitors was associated with inaccurate increase in neutralization titers when HIV-based pseudoparticles were used. IgG purification and consequent elimination of drugs from samples avoided the interference with retroviral cycle and corrected the lack of specificity observed in HIV-pseudotyped assay. This study shows methodological alternatives based on pseudoviruses systems to determine specific SARS-CoV-2 neutralization titers in PLWH.
中和抗体(NAbs)的存在是预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的主要相关因素。因此,已经描述了不同的基于体外假病毒的检测方法来检测针对SARS-CoV-2的中和抗体。然而,通过基于HIV的假颗粒来测定HIV感染者(PLWH)体内针对SARS-CoV-2的中和抗体可能会受到交叉中和活性或治疗的影响,从而阻碍中和抗体的准确滴定。使用复制缺陷型HIV或基于水疱性口炎病毒(VSV)的颗粒,用SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白进行假型化,比较了两种检测方法,以测量COVID-19康复者和未感染COVID-19的PLWH体内的中和抗体。基于HIV假颗粒的检测方法在所有COVID-19康复者中均显示出中和活性,中和滴度50(NT50)中位数为1417.0(四分位间距[IQR]:450.3 - 3284.0),但在67%的未感染COVID-19的PLWH中也有中和活性(NT50:631.5,IQR:16.0 - 1535.0)。对于VSV假颗粒系统,正如预期的那样,在未感染COVID-19的PLWH中未观察到中和作用,而与基于HIV假颗粒的检测方法相比,在75%的COVID-19康复者中测得的中和滴度较低(NT50:100.5;IQR:20.5 - 1353.0)