Department of Health Security, Expert Microbiology Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Meilahti Infectious Diseases and Vaccination Research Center, MeiVac, Department of Infectious Diseases, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0113121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01131-21. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Validation and standardization of accurate serological assays are crucial for the surveillance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and population immunity. We describe the analytical and clinical performance of an in-house fluorescent multiplex immunoassay (FMIA) for simultaneous quantification of antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleoprotein and spike glycoprotein. Furthermore, we calibrated IgG-FMIA against World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard and compared FMIA results to an in-house enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and a microneutralization test (MNT). We also compared the MNT results of two laboratories. IgG-FMIA displayed 100% specificity and sensitivity for samples collected 13 to 150 days post-onset of symptoms (DPO). For IgA- and IgM-FMIA, 100% specificity and sensitivity were obtained for a shorter time window (13 to 36 and 13 to 28 DPO for IgA- and IgM-FMIA, respectively). FMIA and EIA results displayed moderate to strong correlation, but FMIA was overall more specific and sensitive. IgG-FMIA identified 100% of samples with neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Anti-spike IgG concentrations correlated strongly (ρ = 0.77 to 0.84, 2.2 × 10) with NAb titers, and the two laboratories' NAb titers displayed a very strong correlation (ρ = 0.95, 2.2 × 10). Our results indicate good correlation and concordance of antibody concentrations measured with different types of in-house SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. Calibration against the WHO international standard did not, however, improve the comparability of FMIA and EIA results. SARS-CoV-2 serological assays with excellent clinical performance are essential for reliable estimation of the persistence of immunity after infection or vaccination. In this paper we present a thoroughly validated SARS-CoV-2 serological assay with excellent clinical performance and good comparability to neutralizing antibody titers. Neutralization tests are still considered the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 serological assays, but our assay can identify samples with neutralizing antibodies with 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity without the need for laborious and slow biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facility-requiring analyses.
用于同时定量检测针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)核衣壳蛋白和刺突糖蛋白的抗体的内部荧光多重免疫分析(FMIA)的分析和临床性能。此外,我们将 IgG-FMIA 校准为世界卫生组织(WHO)国际标准,并将 FMIA 结果与内部酶免疫分析(EIA)和微量中和试验(MNT)进行比较。我们还比较了两个实验室的 MNT 结果。对于症状出现后 13 至 150 天(DPO)采集的样本,IgG-FMIA 显示出 100%的特异性和灵敏度。对于 IgA 和 IgM-FMIA,100%的特异性和灵敏度在更短的时间窗口内获得(分别为 IgA 和 IgM-FMIA 的 13 至 36 和 13 至 28 DPO)。FMIA 和 EIA 结果显示出中度至高度相关性,但 FMIA 总体上更具特异性和灵敏度。IgG-FMIA 鉴定出具有中和抗体(NAb)的 100%样本。抗刺突 IgG 浓度与 NAb 滴度强烈相关(ρ=0.77 至 0.84,2.2×10),两个实验室的 NAb 滴度显示出非常强的相关性(ρ=0.95,2.2×10)。我们的结果表明,不同类型的内部 SARS-CoV-2 抗体测定中测量的抗体浓度具有良好的相关性和一致性。然而,与 WHO 国际标准校准并没有提高 FMIA 和 EIA 结果的可比性。具有出色临床性能的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测对于可靠估计感染或接种疫苗后免疫持久性至关重要。在本文中,我们提出了一种经过彻底验证的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法,具有出色的临床性能,并且与中和抗体滴度具有良好的可比性。中和试验仍然被认为是 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测的金标准,但我们的检测方法可以以 100%的灵敏度和 96%的特异性识别具有中和抗体的样本,而无需进行繁琐且耗时的生物安全级别 3(BSL-3)设施要求的分析。