School of Health Sciences and Education, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Aug;36(4):1193-1206. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13149. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
Diet is a critical component of healthy lifestyle, especially in cardiac rehabilitation. Psychological interventions, as well as mix-treatment interventions, such as psychological components, appear promising approaches in the adoption and maintenance of a healthy diet in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Given the variety of clinical intervention programmes available, we aimed to determine whether psychological interventions and interventions that incorporate psychological components provide better lifestyle outcomes than traditional care, specifically targeting dietary outcomes, and what types of psychological or mix-treatment interventions are more likely to benefit patients with CVD.
A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO to identify interventional studies, published from 2012 to 2022, written in English, evaluating psychological and mix-treatment intervention programmes for dietary outcomes in patients with CVD. In total, 33 intervention studies (n = 5644 patients) were retrieved and analysed using fixed and random effects models.
No significant effect of the psychological intervention was observed regarding fruit and vegetable intake (Hedge's g = +1.06, p = 0.766), whereas a significant reduction was observed in alcoholic beverage consumption in the intervention group, as compared to the control group (Hedge's g = -7.33, p < 0.001). However, based on both our qualitative and quantitative analyses, psychological and mix-treatment interventions were more effective than traditional models in dietary modification. Also, the majority of effective interventions were psychological over mixed-treatment interventions.
Findings add to the growing evidence suggesting that specific psychological interventions may be effective approaches in dietary modification for patients with CVD, potentially forming part of public health agenda.
饮食是健康生活方式的重要组成部分,尤其在心脏康复中。心理干预以及混合治疗干预(如心理成分)在患者采用和维持心血管疾病(CVD)的健康饮食方面似乎是很有前途的方法。鉴于各种临床干预方案的存在,我们旨在确定心理干预和纳入心理成分的干预措施是否比传统护理更能提供更好的生活方式结果,特别是针对饮食结果,以及哪种类型的心理或混合治疗干预更有可能使 CVD 患者受益。
使用 MEDLINE(PubMed)、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆和 PsycINFO 进行系统文献检索,以确定 2012 年至 2022 年发表的英文评估 CVD 患者饮食结果的心理和混合治疗干预方案的干预研究。共检索到 33 项干预研究(n=5644 名患者),并使用固定和随机效应模型进行分析。
心理干预对水果和蔬菜摄入量没有显著影响(Hedge's g=+1.06,p=0.766),而干预组与对照组相比,酒精饮料摄入量显著减少(Hedge's g=-7.33,p<0.001)。然而,根据我们的定性和定量分析,心理和混合治疗干预在饮食改变方面比传统模式更有效。此外,大多数有效的干预措施是心理干预而不是混合治疗干预。
研究结果增加了越来越多的证据表明,特定的心理干预可能是 CVD 患者饮食改变的有效方法,可能成为公共卫生议程的一部分。