Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行期间的面部创伤管理。

Facial Trauma Management During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2023 May 1;34(3):955-958. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009177. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Facial trauma is managed with open or closed treatment modalities; however, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on facial trauma management remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the management of facial trauma varied during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of 127 adults at The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland between March 2019 and March 2021. Adults were stratified into pre-COVID (before March 2020) and post-COVID groups.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Open reduction internal fixation alone, maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) alone, Open reduction internal fixation and MMF, and closed reduction.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients, 66 were treated pre-COVID (52%) and 61 post-COVID (48%). While the prevalence of mandible fractures did not differ (pre-COVID, n = 39, 59%; post-COVID, n = 42, 69%; P = 0.33), the use of MMF alone decreased (pre-COVID, n = 9, 23%; post-COVID, n = 1, 2%; P = 0.005). In contrast, while the prevalence of displaced nasal bone fractures decreased (pre-COVID, n = 21, 32%; post-COVID, n = 4, 7%; P = 0.0007), management with closed reduction did not differ (pre-COVID, n = 23, 96%; post-COVID, n = 11, 85%; P = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although the clinical characteristics of patients with facial fractures did not differ during the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of MMF for mandible fractures changed significantly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

重要性

面部创伤采用开放或闭合治疗方法进行治疗;然而,新冠疫情对面部创伤管理的影响尚不清楚。

目的

确定新冠疫情期间面部创伤的管理方式是否发生变化。

设计、地点和参与者:对马里兰大学亚当斯考利创伤中心的 127 名成年人进行回顾性研究,时间范围为 2019 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月。将成年人分为新冠前(2020 年 3 月之前)和新冠后组。

主要结果和测量方法

单纯切开复位内固定、单纯颌骨固定、切开复位内固定联合颌骨固定和闭合复位。

结果

127 名患者中,66 名在新冠前(52%)接受治疗,61 名在新冠后(48%)接受治疗。虽然下颌骨骨折的发生率没有差异(新冠前,n = 39,59%;新冠后,n = 42,69%;P = 0.33),但单纯颌骨固定的使用率下降(新冠前,n = 9,23%;新冠后,n = 1,2%;P = 0.005)。相比之下,虽然移位性鼻骨骨折的发生率降低(新冠前,n = 21,32%;新冠后,n = 4,7%;P = 0.0007),但闭合复位的治疗方式没有差异(新冠前,n = 23,96%;新冠后,n = 11,85%;P = 0.27)。

结论和相关性

尽管在新冠疫情期间面部骨折患者的临床特征没有差异,但下颌骨骨折采用颌骨固定的治疗方式发生了显著变化。

证据等级

IV 级。

相似文献

1
Facial Trauma Management During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间的面部创伤管理。
J Craniofac Surg. 2023 May 1;34(3):955-958. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009177. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验