• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立大量输血的核心结局集:东部创伤外科学会改良 Delphi 法共识研究。

Establishing a core outcomes set for massive transfusion: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma modified Delphi method consensus study.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.B.G., J.B.H., J.K.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care (J.N.), University of California, Irvine, Orange, California; Department of Surgery (S.B.), University of Tennessee Health Science Campus, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Surgery (M.Z.), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Surgery (D.S.), R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (E.R.H.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery (J.W.S.), University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; Division of Trauma, Acute Care and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.B.), Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery (B.Z.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (J.C.), School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery (B.A.C.), University of Texas Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery (M.C.), University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Surgery (O.L.G.), Division of Acute Care Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Surgery (L.Z.K.), Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California; Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health (E.E.M., D.D.Y.), University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado; Department of Surgery (C.M.R.), Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas; Department of Surgery (M.S.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; and Department of Surgery (J.L.S.), UPMC Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jun 1;94(6):784-790. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003884. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000003884
PMID:
36727810
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of severe hemorrhage has changed significantly over recent decades, resulting in a heterogeneous description of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the literature, which is not suitable for data pooling. Therefore, we sought to develop a core outcome set (COS) to help guide future massive transfusion (MT) research and overcome the challenge of heterogeneous outcomes reporting.

METHODS

Massive transfusion content experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study. For Round 1, participants submitted a list of proposed core outcomes. In subsequent rounds, panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to score proposed outcomes for importance. Core outcomes consensus was defined as >85% of scores receiving 7 to 9 and <15% of scores receiving 1 to 3. Feedback and aggregate data were shared between rounds.

RESULTS

From an initial panel of 16 experts, 12 (75%) completed three rounds of deliberation to reevaluate variables not achieving predefined consensus criteria. A total of 64 items were considered, with 4 items achieving consensus for inclusion as core outcomes: blood products received in the first 6 hours, 6-hour mortality, time to mortality, and 24-hour mortality.

CONCLUSION

Through an iterative survey consensus process, content experts have defined a COS to guide future MT research. This COS will be a valuable tool for researchers seeking to perform new MT research and will allow future trials to generate data that can be used in pooled analyses with enhanced statistical power.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test or Criteria; Level V.

摘要

背景

近几十年来,严重出血的管理发生了重大变化,导致文献中对诊断、治疗和结局的描述存在异质性,不适合数据汇总。因此,我们试图制定一个核心结局集(COS),以帮助指导未来的大量输血(MT)研究,并克服结局报告异质性的挑战。

方法

大量输血内容专家应邀参加改良 Delphi 研究。在第 1 轮中,参与者提交了一份拟议核心结局的清单。在随后的几轮中,小组成员使用 9 分 Likert 量表对拟议的结局进行重要性评分。核心结局的共识定义为>85%的评分在 7 到 9 之间,<15%的评分在 1 到 3 之间。在各轮之间共享反馈和汇总数据。

结果

从最初的 16 名专家小组中,有 12 名(75%)完成了三轮审议,重新评估了未达到预设共识标准的变量。共考虑了 64 项,其中有 4 项被认为是核心结局,包括:前 6 小时内接受的血液制品、6 小时死亡率、死亡时间和 24 小时死亡率。

结论

通过迭代调查共识过程,内容专家已经确定了一个 COS,以指导未来的 MT 研究。这个 COS 将是研究人员进行新的 MT 研究的宝贵工具,并将允许未来的试验产生可以在汇总分析中使用的增强统计能力的数据。

证据水平

诊断测试或标准;等级 V。

相似文献

1
Establishing a core outcomes set for massive transfusion: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma modified Delphi method consensus study.建立大量输血的核心结局集:东部创伤外科学会改良 Delphi 法共识研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jun 1;94(6):784-790. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003884. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Establishing a core outcome set for blunt cerebrovascular injury: an EAST modified Delphi method consensus study.建立钝性脑血管损伤的核心结局集:一项东部创伤外科学会改良德尔菲法共识研究
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Jun 15;8(1):e001017. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-001017. eCollection 2023.
3
A core outcome set for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma modified Delphi method consensus study.急性坏死性胰腺炎的核心结局集:东部创伤外科学会改良德尔菲法共识研究
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jun 1;96(6):965-970. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004281. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
4
Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.用于评估治疗双胎输血综合征的研究的核心结局集。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):255-261. doi: 10.1002/uog.20183. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
A core outcome set for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: A consensus based approach using a modified Delphi method.用于主动脉复苏性血管内球囊阻断的核心结局集:使用改良 Delphi 法的基于共识的方法。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):144-151. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003405.
6
A core outcome set for appendicitis: A consensus approach utilizing modified Delphi methodology.阑尾炎核心结局集:应用改良 Delphi 法的共识研究
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Mar 1;96(3):487-492. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004144. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
A core outcome domain set for clinical research on capillary malformations (the COSCAM project): an e-Delphi process and consensus meeting.用于毛细管畸形临床研究的核心结局域集(COSCAM 项目):一项电子 Delphi 过程和共识会议。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;187(5):730-742. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21723. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
8
Multi-Round versus Real-Time Delphi survey approach for achieving consensus in the COHESION core outcome set: a randomised trial.多轮与实时 Delphi 调查方法在 COHESION 核心结局集达成共识中的应用:一项随机试验。
Trials. 2023 Jul 19;24(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07388-9.
9
coreSCD: multi-stakeholder consensus on core outcomes for sickle cell disease clinical trials.核心 SCD:镰状细胞病临床试验核心结局的多利益相关者共识。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01413-8.
10
Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi for consensus in core outcome set (COS) development: a randomised trial.多轮与实时德尔菲法在核心结局集(COS)开发中的共识比较:一项随机试验。
Trials. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05074-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole Blood and Blood Component Resuscitation in Trauma: Interaction and Association With Mortality.创伤患者的全血和血液成分复苏:与死亡率的相互作用和关联。
Ann Surg. 2024 Dec 1;280(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006316. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Balanced resuscitation and earlier mortality end points: bayesian post hoc analysis of the PROPPR trial.平衡复苏与早期死亡率终点:PROPPR试验的贝叶斯事后分析
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Aug 9;8(1):e001091. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001091. eCollection 2023.