Suppr超能文献

我们能否让血流限制训练更普及?一种低成本血流限制设备估计动脉闭塞压的有效性。

Can We Make Blood Flow Restriction Training More Accessible? Validity of a Low-Cost Blood Flow Restriction Device to Estimate Arterial Occlusion Pressure.

机构信息

Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Aug 1;37(8):1581-1587. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004434. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Abstract

Keller, M, Faude, O, Gollhofer, A, and Centner, C. Can we make blood flow restriction training more accessible? Validity of a low-cost blood flow restriction device to estimate arterial occlusion pressure. J Strength Cond Res 37(8): 1581-1587, 2023-Evidence indicates that low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) results in comparable gains in muscle mass and muscle strength as high-load resistance training without BFR. Low-load BFR training is a promising tool for areas such as rehabilitation because individuals are exposed to low mechanical stress. However, BFR training is only safe and effective when the cuff pressure is individually adjusted to the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). Generally, thresholds for AOP are typically determined with sophisticated laboratory material, including Doppler ultrasound and tourniquet systems. Therefore, this study investigated the validity of a low-cost BFR product with automatic AOP assessment (AirBands International) compared with the gold standard for determining the individual AOP. Valid measurements were obtained at the arms and legs in 104 healthy volunteers. For the arms ( n = 49), a Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of 7 ± 13 mm Hg between the 2 methods, with slightly higher pressure levels for the gold standard (131 ± 14 mm Hg) than for the low-cost device (125 ± 17 mm Hg). For the legs ( n = 55), the low-cost device reached its maximum pressure capacity in 70% of subjects during AOP identification, making the results on the legs unreliable. Although the low-cost device is a valid tool for identifying the individual AOP in the arms, the device cannot be recommended for use at the legs because of its limited pressure capacity. When using the low-cost device for BFR training at the arms, it is recommended to apply the cuff pressure to 60% of the individual AOP to meet current BFR training guidelines.

摘要

凯勒、M、福德、O、戈尔霍夫、A 和森特纳、C. 我们能否让血流限制训练更普及?一种低成本血流限制设备评估动脉闭塞压的有效性。J 力量与体能研究 37(8):1581-1587,2023-有证据表明,低负荷血流限制(BFR)阻力训练与无 BFR 的高负荷阻力训练相比,可获得相当的肌肉质量和肌肉力量增益。低负荷 BFR 训练是康复等领域很有前途的工具,因为个体承受的机械应力较低。然而,只有当袖带压力根据动脉闭塞压(AOP)单独调整时,BFR 训练才是安全且有效的。通常,AOP 的阈值通常是使用复杂的实验室材料确定的,包括多普勒超声和止血带系统。因此,本研究比较了一种低成本的 BFR 产品(AirBands International)与确定个体 AOP 的黄金标准自动 AOP 评估的有效性。在 104 名健康志愿者的手臂和腿部均获得了有效测量。对于手臂(n=49),Bland-Altman 分析显示两种方法之间的平均差异为 7±13mmHg,金标准(131±14mmHg)的压力水平略高于低成本设备(125±17mmHg)。对于腿部(n=55),在识别 AOP 期间,低成本设备在 70%的受试者中达到其最大压力容量,导致腿部的结果不可靠。尽管低成本设备是一种有效的工具,可用于识别手臂中的个体 AOP,但由于其压力容量有限,不建议在腿部使用该设备。当在手臂上使用低成本设备进行 BFR 训练时,建议将袖带压力应用于个体 AOP 的 60%,以满足当前的 BFR 训练指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验