From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University School of Medicine.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jun 1;151(6):1339-1346. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010120. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
Scientific leadership among women and underrepresented minorities is lacking in plastic surgery. It is unknown whether the underrepresentation of women and ethnic minorities extends into academic conferences. The authors evaluated the temporal trends of female and ethnic minority representation at plastic surgery conferences in the United States.
A retrospective analysis of all presentations from seven national and regional plastic surgery meetings between 2014 and 2018 was conducted. Gender, ethnicity, and academic rank of the first authors were determined by analyzing pronouns, institutional biographies, and accompanying images identified in online searches.
A total of 4180 abstracts were presented by 3452 first authors. The majority of first authors were of European descent (53%), male (65%), and most commonly a resident physician (42%). Women were found to have a greater representation at plastic surgery conferences than in the plastic surgery workforce (34% versus 17%; P < 0.0001). Similarly, relative to American Association of Medical Colleges demographics, individuals of Asian descent were overrepresented as first authors (27% versus 12%; P < 0.0001), whereas first authors of European descent were less prevalent (53% versus 64%; P < 0.0001). When compared with national plastic surgery conferences, regional conferences had a greater proportion of first authors of European descent (51% versus 58%; P < 0.0001) but a lower proportion of first authors of East Asian descent (21% versus 16%; P = 0.0001). Ethnic representation remained persistently low, with first authors of South Asian descent decreasingly represented [from 2014 (10%) to 2018 (6%); P = 0.0062].
Collectively, we present multilevel data that show a promising trend of increased female representation at national meetings. However, there appears to be a decline in ethnic diversity.
在整形外科学领域,女性和代表性不足的少数族裔的科学领导力严重缺乏。目前尚不清楚这种女性和少数族裔代表性不足的情况是否会延伸到学术会议中。作者评估了美国整形外科学术会议中女性和少数族裔代表的时间趋势。
对 2014 年至 2018 年期间在七个全国性和区域性整形外科学术会议上提交的所有演讲进行了回顾性分析。通过分析在线搜索中确定的代词、机构传记和伴随图像,确定第一作者的性别、种族和学术职称。
共有 3452 位第一作者提交了 4180 篇摘要。第一作者主要来自欧洲血统(53%)、男性(65%),且最常见的是住院医师(42%)。研究发现,女性在整形外科学术会议上的代表人数多于整形外科学术领域的人数(34%对 17%;P<0.0001)。同样,与美国医学院协会的人口统计数据相比,亚洲裔个体作为第一作者的人数过多(27%对 12%;P<0.0001),而欧洲裔第一作者的人数则较少(53%对 64%;P<0.0001)。与全国性整形外科学术会议相比,区域性会议的欧洲裔第一作者比例较高(51%对 58%;P<0.0001),而东亚裔第一作者的比例较低(21%对 16%;P=0.0001)。种族代表性仍然很低,南亚裔第一作者的代表性逐渐下降[从 2014 年(10%)到 2018 年(6%);P=0.0062]。
总的来说,我们提供了多层次的数据,表明在全国性会议上女性代表人数增加的趋势令人鼓舞。然而,族裔多样性似乎有所下降。