Ha Grace, Benyamein Paige, Reghunathan Meera, Vatsia Sohrab, Blum Jessica, Gosman Amanda A
From the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Northwell Health, Hempstead, N.Y.
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jul 25;11(7):e5157. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005157. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Disparities in representation amongst academic physicians continue to persist at multiple levels, including the resident selection process and faculty career advancement. This study aimed to evaluate the racial and ethnic representation amongst plastic surgeons who are selected to speak at national and regional plastic surgery conferences.
The researchers evaluated selected speakers at 12 plastic surgery annual meetings over 7 years (2014-2020). Racial and ethnic distribution in selected speakers at conferences were compared with those of medical school graduates, plastic surgery residents, and practicing plastic surgeons.
There were a total of 79 meetings, with 8931 total speaking opportunities and 1276 unique speakers. The percentage of individuals underrepresented in medicine (UIM) is 15.2% in matriculating medical students, 8.9% in active PRS residents, 8.3% in practicing PRS physicians, and 4.7% in invited conference speakers. Within racial/ethnic groups of invited speakers, there was no significant difference in either the average number of fellowships completed or average number of plastic surgery publications ( = 0.44 and 0.39, respectively). No individual UIM speaker had more than 20 speaking opportunities over these 7 years, compared with 17.0% in non-UIM speakers.
Given the results of the study, the researchers conclude that racial minorities are disproportionately underrepresented as selected speakers at plastic surgery conferences, despite similarities in qualifications such as fellowship training, publication number, and years since board certification.
学术医生在多个层面上的代表性差异仍然存在,包括住院医师选拔过程和教师职业发展。本研究旨在评估被选在全国和地区整形外科学术会议上发言的整形外科医生中的种族和民族代表性。
研究人员评估了7年(2014 - 2020年)间12次整形外科学术年会的入选发言者。将会议入选发言者的种族和民族分布与医学院毕业生、整形外科住院医师和执业整形外科医生的分布进行比较。
共有79次会议,总共有8931个发言机会和1276位不同的发言者。医学领域代表性不足的个体(UIM)在入学医学生中的比例为15.2%,在活跃的PRS住院医师中为8.9%,在执业的PRS医生中为8.3%,在受邀参加会议的发言者中为4.7%。在受邀发言者的种族/民族群体中,完成的奖学金平均数量或整形外科出版物平均数量均无显著差异(分别为 = 0.44和0.39)。在这7年中没有个体UIM发言者有超过20次发言机会,而非UIM发言者的这一比例为17.0%。
根据研究结果,研究人员得出结论,尽管在奖学金培训、出版物数量和获得委员会认证后的年限等资质方面存在相似之处,但在整形外科学术会议上,少数族裔作为入选发言者的代表性严重不足。