McHenry Ryan D, Moultrie Christopher E J, Quasim Tara, Mackay Daniel F, Pell Jill P
ScotSTAR, Scottish Ambulance Service, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 1;51(3):347-356. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005765. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
Socioeconomic status is well established as a key determinant of inequalities in health outcomes. Existing literature examining the impact of socioeconomic status on outcomes in critical care has produced inconsistent findings. Our objective was to synthesize the available evidence on the association between socioeconomic status and outcomes in critical care.
A systematic search of CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE was undertaken on September 13, 2022.
Observational cohort studies of adults assessing the association between socioeconomic status and critical care outcomes including mortality, length of stay, and functional outcomes were included. Two independent reviewers assessed titles, abstracts, and full texts against eligibility and quality criteria.
Details of study methodology, population, exposure measures, and outcomes were extracted.
Thirty-eight studies met eligibility criteria for systematic review. Twenty-three studies reporting mortality to less than or equal to 30 days following critical care admission, and eight reporting length of stay, were included in meta-analysis. Random-effects pooled analysis showed that lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher mortality at less than or equal to 30 days following critical care admission, with pooled odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CIs, 1.05-1.22). Meta-analysis of ICU length of stay demonstrated no significant difference between socioeconomic groups. Socioeconomic status may also be associated with functional status and discharge destination following ICU admission.
Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher mortality following admission to critical care.
社会经济地位已被确认为健康结果不平等的关键决定因素。现有研究社会经济地位对重症监护结果影响的文献得出了不一致的结果。我们的目的是综合关于社会经济地位与重症监护结果之间关联的现有证据。
2022年9月13日对CINAHL、Ovid MEDLINE和EMBASE进行了系统检索。
纳入评估社会经济地位与重症监护结果(包括死亡率、住院时间和功能结局)之间关联的成人观察性队列研究。两名独立评审员根据纳入标准和质量标准评估标题、摘要和全文。
提取研究方法、人群、暴露测量和结局的详细信息。
38项研究符合系统评价的纳入标准。23项报告重症监护入院后30天及以内死亡率的研究,以及8项报告住院时间的研究纳入荟萃分析。随机效应汇总分析显示,社会经济地位较低与重症监护入院后30天及以内较高的死亡率相关,汇总比值比为1.13(95%置信区间,1.05 - 1.22)。对重症监护病房住院时间的荟萃分析表明,社会经济群体之间无显著差异。社会经济地位也可能与重症监护病房入院后的功能状态和出院目的地有关。
社会经济地位较低与重症监护入院后的较高死亡率相关。