Usefulness of Breath-Hold Fat-Suppressed T2-Weighted Images With Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction of the Liver: Comparison to Conventional Free-Breathing Turbo Spin Echo.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of breath-hold turbo spin echo with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-TSE) in acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images (FS-T2WI) of the liver by comparing this method with conventional free-breathing turbo spin echo (FB-TSE) and breath-hold half Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-HASTE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort comprised 111 patients with suspected liver disease who underwent 3 T magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty-eight focal solid liver lesions ≥10 mm were also evaluated. Three sets of FS-T2WI were acquired using FB-TSE, prototypical BH-DL-TSE, and prototypical BH-DL-HASTE, respectively. In the qualitative analysis, 2 radiologists evaluated the image quality using a 5-point scale. In the quantitative analysis, we calculated the lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratio (LEL-SIR). Friedman test and Dunn multiple comparison test were performed to assess differences among 3 types of FS-T2WI with respect to image quality and LEL-SIR.

RESULTS

The mean acquisition time was 4 minutes and 43 seconds ± 1 minute and 21 seconds (95% confidence interval, 4 minutes and 28 seconds to 4 minutes and 58 seconds) for FB-TSE, 40 seconds for BH-DL-TSE, and 20 seconds for BH-DL-HASTE. In the qualitative analysis, BH-DL-HASTE resulted in the fewest respiratory motion artifacts ( P < 0.0001). BH-DL-TSE and FB-TSE exhibited significantly less motion-related signal loss and clearer intrahepatic vessels than BH-DL-HASTE ( P < 0.0001). Regarding the edge sharpness of the left lobe, BH-DL-HASTE scored the highest ( P < 0.0001), and BH-DL-TSE scored higher than FB-TSE ( P = 0.0290). There were no significant differences among 3 types of FS-T2WI with respect to the edge sharpness of the right lobe ( P = 0.1290), lesion conspicuity ( P = 0.5292), and LEL-SIR ( P = 0.6026).

CONCLUSIONS

BH-DL-TSE provides a shorter acquisition time and comparable or better image quality than FB-TSE, and could replace FB-TSE in acquiring FS-T2WI of the liver. BH-DL-TSE and BH-DL-HASTE have their own advantages and may be used complementarily.