Suppr超能文献

用于小型(<250微米)全层黄斑裂孔的倒置内界膜瓣:解剖学和功能结果

INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP FOR SMALL-SIZED (<250 µ m) FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE : Anatomical and Functional Outcome.

作者信息

Iuliano Lorenzo, Corbelli Eleonora, Bandello Francesco, Codenotti Marco

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Retina. 2023 Apr 1;43(4):547-554. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003728.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the anatomical and functional outcome of small (<250 µ m) and medium (250-400 µ m) full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) treated with internal limiting membrane (ILM) inverted flap (IF) or with the standard technique.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal analysis of successfully operated eyes with small or intermediate FTMH. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetric sensitivity (with fixation stability), and restoration of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) at 6 months.

RESULTS

Fifty small and 50 intermediate eyes with FTMH were included, half of each group (25) treated with the standard technique, half with IF. BCVA increased in every subgroup, similarly within the same stage regardless the technique. Small FTMH treated with IF disclosed inferior foveal sensitivity at 6 months (20.79 ± 0.48 dB) compared with the standard technique (21.51 ± 0.79 dB; P = 0.0035). At 1 month, inferior rates of ELM (24%) and EZ (24%) restoration were also found, compared with the standard technique (56% ELM P = 0.0420; 64% EZ P = 0.0095). At 6 months, ELM and EZ were similarly restored.

CONCLUSION

The surgical repair of small FMTH with ILM IF seem to delay the foveal structural repair and to gain an inferior foveal sensitivity compared to the standard technique.

摘要

目的

比较采用内界膜(ILM)反转瓣(IF)或标准技术治疗的小(<250μm)和中(250 - 400μm)全层黄斑裂孔(FTMH)的解剖和功能结果。

方法

对成功手术治疗的小或中度FTMH患眼进行回顾性纵向分析。观察指标为6个月时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、微视野敏感度(包括注视稳定性)以及外界膜(ELM)和椭圆体带(EZ)的恢复情况。

结果

纳入50只患有小FTMH的眼睛和50只患有中度FTMH的眼睛,每组各一半(25只)采用标准技术治疗,另一半采用IF治疗。每个亚组的BCVA均有所提高,在同一阶段内,无论采用何种技术,提高情况相似。与标准技术(21.51±0.79dB;P = 0.0035)相比,采用IF治疗的小FTMH在6个月时黄斑中心凹敏感度较低(20.79±0.48dB)。在1个月时,与标准技术相比,ELM(24%)和EZ(24%)的恢复率也较低(标准技术ELM为56%,P = 0.0420;EZ为64%,P = 0.0095)。在6个月时,ELM和EZ的恢复情况相似。

结论

与标准技术相比,采用ILM IF手术修复小FMTH似乎会延迟黄斑中心凹的结构修复,并导致黄斑中心凹敏感度较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验