Iuliano Lorenzo, Corbelli Eleonora, Bandello Francesco, Codenotti Marco
Department of Ophthalmology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Retina. 2023 Apr 1;43(4):547-554. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003728.
To compare the anatomical and functional outcome of small (<250 µ m) and medium (250-400 µ m) full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) treated with internal limiting membrane (ILM) inverted flap (IF) or with the standard technique.
Retrospective longitudinal analysis of successfully operated eyes with small or intermediate FTMH. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetric sensitivity (with fixation stability), and restoration of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) at 6 months.
Fifty small and 50 intermediate eyes with FTMH were included, half of each group (25) treated with the standard technique, half with IF. BCVA increased in every subgroup, similarly within the same stage regardless the technique. Small FTMH treated with IF disclosed inferior foveal sensitivity at 6 months (20.79 ± 0.48 dB) compared with the standard technique (21.51 ± 0.79 dB; P = 0.0035). At 1 month, inferior rates of ELM (24%) and EZ (24%) restoration were also found, compared with the standard technique (56% ELM P = 0.0420; 64% EZ P = 0.0095). At 6 months, ELM and EZ were similarly restored.
The surgical repair of small FMTH with ILM IF seem to delay the foveal structural repair and to gain an inferior foveal sensitivity compared to the standard technique.
比较采用内界膜(ILM)反转瓣(IF)或标准技术治疗的小(<250μm)和中(250 - 400μm)全层黄斑裂孔(FTMH)的解剖和功能结果。
对成功手术治疗的小或中度FTMH患眼进行回顾性纵向分析。观察指标为6个月时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、微视野敏感度(包括注视稳定性)以及外界膜(ELM)和椭圆体带(EZ)的恢复情况。
纳入50只患有小FTMH的眼睛和50只患有中度FTMH的眼睛,每组各一半(25只)采用标准技术治疗,另一半采用IF治疗。每个亚组的BCVA均有所提高,在同一阶段内,无论采用何种技术,提高情况相似。与标准技术(21.51±0.79dB;P = 0.0035)相比,采用IF治疗的小FTMH在6个月时黄斑中心凹敏感度较低(20.79±0.48dB)。在1个月时,与标准技术相比,ELM(24%)和EZ(24%)的恢复率也较低(标准技术ELM为56%,P = 0.0420;EZ为64%,P = 0.0095)。在6个月时,ELM和EZ的恢复情况相似。
与标准技术相比,采用ILM IF手术修复小FMTH似乎会延迟黄斑中心凹的结构修复,并导致黄斑中心凹敏感度较低。