Department of Ophthalmology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea.
Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 29;19(4):e0302481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302481. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique in full-thickness macular holes (MHs) with a size of ≤400 μm compared to the ILM peeling technique.
Related literatures that compared inverted ILM flap and ILM peeling in MHs ≤ 400 μm were reviewed by searching electronic databases including Pubmed, EMbase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library up to April 2023. The primary outcome measure was hole closure rate, and the secondary outcome measures were the mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity, and outer status of the retinal layers, including the external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone. The quality of the articles was assessed according to the revised version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In the case of heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias was visually evaluated using a funnel plot.
This review included six studies with 610 eyes for the primary outcome and 385 eyes for the secondary outcomes, which were two randomized control trials and four retrospective studies. Pooled data revealed that the overall MH closure rate was 99.4% in the inverted ILM flap group and 96.2% in the ILM peeling group, without significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio = 3.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.82~18.69; P = 0.09). The inverted ILM flap technique did not have a favorable effect on the BCVA, retinal sensitivity, or recovery of the outer retinal layers. These results were consistent with those of the subgroup analysis of the different follow-up periods. No significant publication bias was observed.
In eyes with MHs of ≤400 μm, both techniques demonstrated excellent surgical outcomes without significant differences. Therefore, surgical techniques can be selected according to surgeon preferences.
评估与内界膜(ILM)剥离技术相比,倒置 ILM 瓣技术在大小≤400μm 的全层黄斑裂孔(MH)中的疗效。
通过检索 Pubmed、EMbase、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane Library 等电子数据库,对截至 2023 年 4 月比较 MHs≤400μm 中倒置 ILM 瓣和 ILM 剥离的相关文献进行综述。主要观察指标为孔闭合率,次要观察指标为术后平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、视网膜敏感度和视网膜外层状态,包括外界膜和椭圆体带。根据改良的 Cochrane 随机对照试验偏倚风险工具或纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估文章质量。在存在异质性的情况下,进行敏感性分析,并使用漏斗图进行发表偏倚的视觉评估。
本综述纳入了 6 项研究,共 610 只眼用于主要结局,385 只眼用于次要结局,其中包括 2 项随机对照试验和 4 项回顾性研究。汇总数据显示,倒置 ILM 瓣组的 MH 总体闭合率为 99.4%,ILM 剥离组为 96.2%,两组间无显著差异(优势比=3.91;95%置信区间,0.82~18.69;P=0.09)。倒置 ILM 瓣技术对 BCVA、视网膜敏感度或外视网膜层的恢复没有有利影响。这些结果与不同随访期的亚组分析结果一致。未观察到显著的发表偏倚。
在 MHs 大小≤400μm 的眼中,两种技术的手术效果均非常出色,无显著差异。因此,可以根据外科医生的偏好选择手术技术。