Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse, R Pedro de Toledo 980 Cj 94, São Paulo, SP, 04039-002, Brazil.
Anesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care Department, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;18(2):409-421. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03179-3. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
We aimed to assess the prevalence, patient allocation adequacy, and mortality of adults with sepsis in Brazilian emergency departments (ED) in a point-prevalence 3-day investigation of patients with sepsis who presented to the ED and those who remained there due to inadequate allocation. Allocation was considered adequate if the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), ward, or remained in the ED without ICU admission requests. Prevalence was estimated using the total ED visit number. Prognostic factors were assessed with logistic regression. Of 33,902 ED visits in 74 institutions, 183 were acute admissions (prevalence: 5.4 sepsis per 1000 visits [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.6-6.2)], and 148 were already in the ED; totaling 331 patients. Hospital mortality was 32% (103/322, 95% CI 23.0-51.0). Age (odds ratio (OR) 1.22 [95% CI 1.10-1.37]), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 1.41 [95% CI 1.28-1.57]), healthcare-associated infections (OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.24-5.50]) and low-resource institution admission (OR 2.65 [95% CI 1.07-6.90]) were associated with higher mortality. Accredited institutions (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.21-0.86]) had lower mortality rates. Allocation within 24 h was adequate in only 52.8% of patients (public hospitals: 42.4% (81/190) vs. private institutions: 67.4% (89/132, p < 0.001) with 39.2% (74/189) of public hospital patients remaining in the ED until discharge, of whom 55.4% (41/74) died. Sepsis exerts high burden and mortality in Brazilian EDs with frequent inadequate allocation. Modifiable factors, such as resources and quality of care, are associated with reduced mortality.
我们旨在评估巴西急诊科(ED)成人脓毒症的患病率、患者分配充足率和死亡率,该研究对因分配不足而在急诊科就诊和仍留在急诊科的脓毒症患者进行了为期 3 天的患病率调查。如果患者被转至重症监护病房(ICU)、病房或留在 ED 而未要求 ICU 入院,则认为分配是充足的。患病率采用 ED 总就诊人数估计。使用逻辑回归评估预后因素。在 74 家机构的 33902 次 ED 就诊中,有 183 次为急性就诊(患病率:每 1000 次就诊中有 5.4 例脓毒症[95%置信区间(CI):4.6-6.2]),148 例已在 ED;总共有 331 例患者。医院死亡率为 32%(103/322,95%CI:23.0-51.0)。年龄(比值比(OR)1.22[95%CI:1.10-1.37])、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(OR 1.41[95%CI:1.28-1.57])、与医疗保健相关的感染(OR 2.59[95%CI:1.24-5.50])和低资源机构入院(OR 2.65[95%CI:1.07-6.90])与更高的死亡率相关。经认证的机构(OR 0.42[95%CI:0.21-0.86])死亡率较低。只有 52.8%(公共医院:42.4%(81/190)与私立机构:67.4%(89/132,p<0.001))的患者在 24 小时内得到了充分的分配,其中 39.2%(74/189)的公共医院患者在出院前仍留在 ED,其中 55.4%(41/74)死亡。脓毒症在巴西 ED 中造成了高负担和高死亡率,且经常出现分配不足的情况。可改变的因素,如资源和护理质量,与降低死亡率相关。