• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西急诊科的脓毒症:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。

Sepsis in Brazilian emergency departments: a prospective multicenter observational study.

机构信息

Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse, R Pedro de Toledo 980 Cj 94, São Paulo, SP, 04039-002, Brazil.

Anesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care Department, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;18(2):409-421. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03179-3. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-022-03179-3
PMID:36729268
Abstract

We aimed to assess the prevalence, patient allocation adequacy, and mortality of adults with sepsis in Brazilian emergency departments (ED) in a point-prevalence 3-day investigation of patients with sepsis who presented to the ED and those who remained there due to inadequate allocation. Allocation was considered adequate if the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), ward, or remained in the ED without ICU admission requests. Prevalence was estimated using the total ED visit number. Prognostic factors were assessed with logistic regression. Of 33,902 ED visits in 74 institutions, 183 were acute admissions (prevalence: 5.4 sepsis per 1000 visits [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.6-6.2)], and 148 were already in the ED; totaling 331 patients. Hospital mortality was 32% (103/322, 95% CI 23.0-51.0). Age (odds ratio (OR) 1.22 [95% CI 1.10-1.37]), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 1.41 [95% CI 1.28-1.57]), healthcare-associated infections (OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.24-5.50]) and low-resource institution admission (OR 2.65 [95% CI 1.07-6.90]) were associated with higher mortality. Accredited institutions (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.21-0.86]) had lower mortality rates. Allocation within 24 h was adequate in only 52.8% of patients (public hospitals: 42.4% (81/190) vs. private institutions: 67.4% (89/132, p < 0.001) with 39.2% (74/189) of public hospital patients remaining in the ED until discharge, of whom 55.4% (41/74) died. Sepsis exerts high burden and mortality in Brazilian EDs with frequent inadequate allocation. Modifiable factors, such as resources and quality of care, are associated with reduced mortality.

摘要

我们旨在评估巴西急诊科(ED)成人脓毒症的患病率、患者分配充足率和死亡率,该研究对因分配不足而在急诊科就诊和仍留在急诊科的脓毒症患者进行了为期 3 天的患病率调查。如果患者被转至重症监护病房(ICU)、病房或留在 ED 而未要求 ICU 入院,则认为分配是充足的。患病率采用 ED 总就诊人数估计。使用逻辑回归评估预后因素。在 74 家机构的 33902 次 ED 就诊中,有 183 次为急性就诊(患病率:每 1000 次就诊中有 5.4 例脓毒症[95%置信区间(CI):4.6-6.2]),148 例已在 ED;总共有 331 例患者。医院死亡率为 32%(103/322,95%CI:23.0-51.0)。年龄(比值比(OR)1.22[95%CI:1.10-1.37])、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(OR 1.41[95%CI:1.28-1.57])、与医疗保健相关的感染(OR 2.59[95%CI:1.24-5.50])和低资源机构入院(OR 2.65[95%CI:1.07-6.90])与更高的死亡率相关。经认证的机构(OR 0.42[95%CI:0.21-0.86])死亡率较低。只有 52.8%(公共医院:42.4%(81/190)与私立机构:67.4%(89/132,p<0.001))的患者在 24 小时内得到了充分的分配,其中 39.2%(74/189)的公共医院患者在出院前仍留在 ED,其中 55.4%(41/74)死亡。脓毒症在巴西 ED 中造成了高负担和高死亡率,且经常出现分配不足的情况。可改变的因素,如资源和护理质量,与降低死亡率相关。

相似文献

1
Sepsis in Brazilian emergency departments: a prospective multicenter observational study.巴西急诊科的脓毒症:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;18(2):409-421. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03179-3. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Associations of Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain with Disposition and Outcomes of Patients with Sepsis Presenting to the Emergency Department.急诊脓毒症患者 ICU 容量负荷与转归的相关性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Nov;15(11):1328-1335. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201804-241OC.
3
The epidemiology of sepsis in Brazilian intensive care units (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database, SPREAD): an observational study.巴西重症监护病房脓毒症的流行病学(脓毒症患病率评估数据库,SPREAD):一项观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1180-1189. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30322-5. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
A multicentre, prospective study to evaluate costs of septic patients in Brazilian intensive care units.一项评估巴西重症监护病房脓毒症患者费用的多中心前瞻性研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(5):425-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826050-00006.
5
Risk factors for unplanned transfer to intensive care within 24 hours of admission from the emergency department in an integrated healthcare system.综合医疗体系中,急诊入院 24 小时内转入重症监护病房的风险因素。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Jan;8(1):13-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1979. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
6
Multicenter observational study of the development of progressive organ dysfunction and therapeutic interventions in normotensive sepsis patients in the emergency department.多中心观察性研究:正常血压脓毒症患者在急诊科进展性器官功能障碍的发生和治疗干预。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 May;20(5):433-40. doi: 10.1111/acem.12137.
7
Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Emergency Department Discharge Among Patients With Sepsis.脓毒症患者急诊出院的患病率、特征和结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147882. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47882.
8
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
9
Validation of the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions in the Pediatric Emergency Department.验证儿科序贯性器官衰竭评估评分,并评估儿科急诊中第三代国际脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的共识定义。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jul 1;176(7):672-678. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1301.
10
In-Hospital Outcomes and Costs Among Patients Hospitalized During a Return Visit to the Emergency Department.急诊科复诊住院患者的院内结局与费用
JAMA. 2016 Feb 16;315(7):663-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0649.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic therapy for severe bacterial infections.针对严重细菌感染的抗生素治疗。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08063-0.
2
Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet): shaping the landscape of critical care research in Brazil and beyond.巴西重症监护网络研究(BRICNet):塑造巴西及其他地区重症监护研究的格局。
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 20;37:e20250284. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250284. eCollection 2025.
3
Improving the outcomes of sepsis in Brazil: strategies and initiatives.改善巴西脓毒症的治疗效果:策略与举措

本文引用的文献

1
Estimates of Sepsis Prevalence and Outcomes in Adult Patients in the ICU in India: A Cross-sectional Study.印度重症监护病房成年患者脓毒症患病率及转归的估计:一项横断面研究。
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1543-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.673. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Healthcare Seeking and Access to Care for Pneumonia, Sepsis, Meningitis, and Malaria in Rural Gambia.冈比亚农村地区肺炎、败血症、脑膜炎和疟疾的医疗寻求和获得情况。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Dec 6;106(2):446-453. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0362.
3
Access to intensive care in 14 European countries: a spatial analysis of intensive care need and capacity in the light of COVID-19.
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 16;37:e20250313. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250313. eCollection 2025.
4
A single-center retrospective study of pathogen distribution and antibiotic resistance of bloodstream infections in emergency department.急诊科血流感染病原体分布及抗生素耐药性的单中心回顾性研究
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Nov 28;49(11):1799-1807. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240333.
5
Space scan statistics to identify clusters of neonatal mortality associated with bacterial sepsis.用于识别与细菌性败血症相关的新生儿死亡聚集区的空间扫描统计方法。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Dec 13;152:e169. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824001663.
6
Sepsis in Brazilian emergency departments.巴西急诊科的脓毒症
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;19(6):1531-1532. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03680-x. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
7
Diagnosis of sepsis in the emergency department: a real-world analysis from Lombardy, Italy.急诊科脓毒症的诊断:来自意大利伦巴第的真实世界分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;19(2):313-320. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03464-9. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
14 个欧洲国家的重症监护病房资源获取情况:基于 COVID-19 分析重症监护需求和能力的空间分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;46(11):2026-2034. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06229-6. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
4
The Prevalence and Outcomes of Sepsis in Adult Patients in Two Hospitals in Malawi.马拉维两家医院成年患者脓毒症的患病率和结局。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Apr;102(4):896-901. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0320.
5
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
6
Population Incidence and Mortality of Sepsis in an Urban African Setting, 2013-2016.2013-2016 年城市中非洲人群的脓毒症发病率和死亡率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2547-2552. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1119.
7
Availability of resources to treat sepsis in Brazil: a random sample of Brazilian institutions.巴西治疗脓毒症的资源可用性:巴西机构的随机样本。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 May 30;31(2):193-201. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190033.
8
Factors related to delayed intensive care unit admission from emergency department-A retrospective cohort study.与从急诊科延迟进入重症监护病房相关的因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Aug;63(7):939-946. doi: 10.1111/aas.13355. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Prolonged length of stay in the emergency department and increased risk of hospital mortality in patients with sepsis requiring ICU admission.需要入住 ICU 的脓毒症患者在急诊停留时间延长与住院死亡率升高有关。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Feb;36(2):82-87. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208032. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
The Prevalence of Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock in an Irish Emergency Department.爱尔兰急诊科严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克的患病率
Ir Med J. 2018 Feb 9;111(2):692.