• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Prevalence and Outcomes of Sepsis in Adult Patients in Two Hospitals in Malawi.马拉维两家医院成年患者脓毒症的患病率和结局。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Apr;102(4):896-901. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0320.
2
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
3
Prevalence, Etiology, and Outcome of Sepsis among Critically Ill Patients in Malawi.马拉维危重症患者脓毒症的流行率、病因和结局。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):472-479. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0605. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
4
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
5
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
6
[Evaluation value of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score on prognosis of intensive care unit adult patients with infection: a 17-year observation study from the real world].快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对重症监护病房成年感染患者预后的评估价值:一项基于现实世界的17年观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):544-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.008.
7
Applicability of Sepsis-3 criteria and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in patients with cirrhosis hospitalised for bacterial infections.Sepsis-3 标准和快速序贯器官衰竭评估在肝硬化合并细菌感染住院患者中的适用性。
Liver Int. 2019 Feb;39(2):307-315. doi: 10.1111/liv.13980. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
8
Application of the qSOFA score to predict mortality in patients with suspected infection in a resource-limited setting in Malawi.qSOFA 评分在马拉维资源有限环境下疑似感染患者中的死亡率预测中的应用。
Infection. 2017 Dec;45(6):893-896. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1057-5. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分在预测严重脓毒症及死亡率方面表现不佳——一项针对急诊科收治的感染患者的前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4.
10
[A multicenter confirmatory study about precision and practicability of Sepsis-3].关于脓毒症-3(Sepsis-3)精准度与实用性的多中心验证性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):99-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Inability-to-walk-unaided-a single WHO danger sign predicts in-hospital mortality in people with HIV under routine care conditions in a low-resource setting.无法独立行走——在资源匮乏环境下的常规护理条件下,世界卫生组织的单一危险信号可预测艾滋病毒感染者的院内死亡率。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 5;12:20499361251341385. doi: 10.1177/20499361251341385. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Mortality due to Sepsis and Its Associated Factors Among Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units of Southern Amhara Public Hospitals, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚南方阿姆哈拉公立医院 ICU 住院患者中,因脓毒症导致的死亡率及其相关因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Oct 28;2024:4378635. doi: 10.1155/2024/4378635. eCollection 2024.
3
A health systems approach to critical care delivery in low-resource settings: a narrative review.在资源匮乏环境下提供重症监护的卫生系统方法:叙事性综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):772-784. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07136-2. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
Sepsis in Brazilian emergency departments: a prospective multicenter observational study.巴西急诊科的脓毒症:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;18(2):409-421. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03179-3. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Resource use, availability and cost in the provision of critical care in Tanzania: a systematic review.坦桑尼亚提供重症监护服务的资源利用、可得性和成本:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e060422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060422.
6
A comparison of different scores for diagnosis and mortality prediction of adults with sepsis in Low-and-Middlencome Countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家成人脓毒症诊断及死亡率预测不同评分的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Oct 30;42:101184. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101184. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Resource availability, utilisation and cost in the provision of critical care in Tanzania: a protocol for a systematic review.坦桑尼亚提供重症监护服务的资源可用性、利用情况和成本:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 25;11(8):e050881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050881.
8
Variation of vital signs with potential to influence the performance of qSOFA scoring in the Ethiopian general population at different altitudes of residency: A multisite cross-sectional study.生命体征的变化对 qSOFA 评分在埃塞俄比亚不同居住海拔普通人群中的表现有影响:一项多地点横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0245496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245496. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score With Excess Hospital Mortality in Adults With Suspected Infection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分与中低收入国家疑似感染成人医院过度死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2202-2211. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6229.
2
Mortality outcomes based on ED qSOFA score and HIV status in a developing low income country.发展中国家低医疗资源地区基于 ED qSOFA 评分和 HIV 状况的死亡率结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;36(11):2010-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
3
Sepsis: A Threat That Needs a Global Solution.脓毒症:一项需要全球解决方案的威胁。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):454-459. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002899.
4
Application of the qSOFA score to predict mortality in patients with suspected infection in a resource-limited setting in Malawi.qSOFA 评分在马拉维资源有限环境下疑似感染患者中的死亡率预测中的应用。
Infection. 2017 Dec;45(6):893-896. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1057-5. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
5
Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分在预测严重脓毒症及死亡率方面表现不佳——一项针对急诊科收治的感染患者的前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4.
6
Presentation, management, and outcomes of sepsis in adults and children admitted to a rural Ugandan hospital: A prospective observational cohort study.乌干达农村医院收治的成人和儿童脓毒症的表现、管理及结局:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0171422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171422. eCollection 2017.
7
Quick SOFA Scores Predict Mortality in Adult Emergency Department Patients With and Without Suspected Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分可预测成年急诊科患者(无论有无疑似感染)的死亡率。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;69(4):475-479. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.007. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
8
Sepsis as 2 problems: Identifying sepsis at admission and predicting onset in the hospital using an electronic medical record-based acuity score.脓毒症的两个问题:入院时识别脓毒症以及使用基于电子病历的 acuity 评分预测医院内脓毒症的发病情况。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.037. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
9
Sepsis in Haiti: Prevalence, treatment, and outcomes in a Port-au-Prince referral hospital.海地的脓毒症:太子港一家转诊医院的患病率、治疗及结果
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Combining quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with plasma lactate concentration is comparable to standard Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting mortality of patients with and without suspected infection.将快速序贯器官衰竭评估与血浆乳酸浓度相结合,在预测有或无疑似感染患者的死亡率方面,与标准序贯器官衰竭评估评分相当。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

马拉维两家医院成年患者脓毒症的患病率和结局。

The Prevalence and Outcomes of Sepsis in Adult Patients in Two Hospitals in Malawi.

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.

Department of Internal Medicine, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Apr;102(4):896-901. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0320.

DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.19-0320
PMID:32043446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7124904/
Abstract

There are an estimated 19.4 million sepsis cases every year, many of them in low-income countries. The newly adopted definition of sepsis uses Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA), a score which is not feasible in many low-resource settings. A simpler quick-SOFA (qSOFA) based solely on vital signs score has been devised for identification of suspected sepsis. This study aimed to determine in-hospital prevalence and outcomes of sepsis, as defined as suspected infection and a qSOFA score of 2 or more, in two hospitals in Malawi. The secondary aim was to evaluate qSOFA as a predictor of mortality. A cross-sectional study of adult in-patients in two hospitals in Malawi was conducted using prospectively collected single-day point-prevalence data and in-hospital follow-up. Of 1,135 participants, 81 (7.1%) had sepsis. Septic patients had a higher hospital mortality rate (17.5%) than non-septic infected patients (9.0%, = 0.027, odds ratio 2.1 [1.1-4.3]), although the difference was not statistically significant after adjustment for baseline characteristics. For in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection, qSOFA ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 31.8%, specificity of 82.1%, a positive predictive value of 17.5%, and a negative predictive value of 91.0%. In conclusion, sepsis is common and is associated with a high risk of death in admitted patients in hospitals in Malawi. In low-resource settings, qSOFA score that uses commonly available vital signs data may be a tool that could be used for identifying patients at risk-both for those with and without a suspected infection.

摘要

每年估计有 1940 万例败血症病例,其中许多发生在低收入国家。新采用的败血症定义使用序贯器官衰竭评估评分(SOFA),但在许多资源匮乏的环境中,该评分并不可行。因此,设计了一种更简单的基于生命体征的快速 SOFA(qSOFA)评分,用于识别疑似败血症。本研究旨在确定马拉维两家医院中,根据疑似感染和 qSOFA 评分≥2 定义的败血症的院内患病率和结局。次要目标是评估 qSOFA 作为死亡率的预测指标。这是一项在马拉维两家医院进行的成年住院患者的横断面研究,使用前瞻性收集的单日点患病率数据和院内随访。在 1135 名参与者中,有 81 人(7.1%)患有败血症。败血症患者的医院死亡率(17.5%)高于非感染性败血症患者(9.0%, = 0.027,优势比 2.1[1.1-4.3]),尽管在调整基线特征后,差异无统计学意义。对于疑似感染患者的院内死亡率,qSOFA≥2 的灵敏度为 31.8%,特异性为 82.1%,阳性预测值为 17.5%,阴性预测值为 91.0%。总之,败血症在马拉维医院的住院患者中很常见,并且与死亡风险增加相关。在资源匮乏的环境中,使用常用生命体征数据的 qSOFA 评分可能是一种可用于识别高危患者的工具,包括疑似感染和无感染的患者。