• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国人群急性主动脉综合征的主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体:最佳阈值及综合诊断价值探索

Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score and D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes in the Chinese Population: Exploration of Optimal Thresholds and Integrated Diagnostic Value.

作者信息

Deng Li, Xia Qingping, Diao Liwei, Lin Fei, Cao Yong, Han Hongguang, Song Mowei

机构信息

Department of Extracorporeal Life Support, The People's Hospital of Gaozhou, Gaozhou, 525200, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023 Aug;16(4):886-895. doi: 10.1007/s12265-023-10354-0. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s12265-023-10354-0
PMID:36729356
Abstract

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) plus D-dimer for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in Chinese patients. Two hundred and sixty-two and 200 patients with suspected AAS symptoms were enrolled as exploration cohort and validation cohort, respectively. In exploration cohort, ADD-RS plus D-dimer (AUC = 0.929, 95%CI: 0.887-0.971) presented a better diagnostic value for AAS than ADD-RS or D-dimer alone. Meanwhile, ADD-RS > 1 and D-dimer > 2000 ng/mL were the optimal thresholds. Then, a diagnostic model integrating ADD-RS > 1 plus D-dimer > 2000 ng/mL was established, presenting sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.5%, 70.3%, 34.9%, and 98.2%, respectively. In validation cohort, the established diagnostic model exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 93.1%, 70.2%, 34.6%, and 98.4%, respectively, for diagnosing AAS. Summarily, ADD-RS > 1 and D-dimer > 2000 ng/mL are optimal thresholds for diagnosing AAS in the Chinese population. However, confirmative MSCT results are necessary.

摘要

本研究旨在评估主动脉夹层检测风险评分(ADD-RS)联合D-二聚体对中国患者急性主动脉综合征(AAS)的诊断效能。分别纳入262例和200例有AAS疑似症状的患者作为探索队列和验证队列。在探索队列中,ADD-RS联合D-二聚体(AUC = 0.929,95%CI:0.887 - 0.971)对AAS的诊断价值优于单独使用ADD-RS或D-二聚体。同时,ADD-RS > 1且D-二聚体> 2000 ng/mL为最佳阈值。随后,建立了一个整合ADD-RS > 1联合D-二聚体> 2000 ng/mL的诊断模型,其灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为92.5%、70.3%、34.9%和98.2%。在验证队列中,所建立的诊断模型对AAS诊断的灵敏度、特异度、PPV和NPV分别为93.1%、70.2%、34.6%和98.4%。总之,ADD-RS > 1且D-二聚体> 2000 ng/mL是中国人群诊断AAS的最佳阈值。然而,确诊仍需MSCT结果。

相似文献

1
Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score and D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes in the Chinese Population: Exploration of Optimal Thresholds and Integrated Diagnostic Value.中国人群急性主动脉综合征的主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体:最佳阈值及综合诊断价值探索
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023 Aug;16(4):886-895. doi: 10.1007/s12265-023-10354-0. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes: The ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study.主动脉夹层检测风险评分加 D-二聚体对急性主动脉综合征的诊断准确性:ADvISED 前瞻性多中心研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 16;137(3):250-258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029457. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer for acute aortic syndromes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯或联合 D-二聚体检测主动脉夹层检测风险评分对急性主动脉综合征的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0304401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304401. eCollection 2024.
4
Accuracy of a diagnostic strategy combining aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome.疑似急性主动脉综合征患者中联合主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体水平的诊断策略的准确性
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Aug;6(5):371-378. doi: 10.1177/2048872615594497. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
5
Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯使用主动脉夹层检测风险评分与联合 D-二聚体检测对主动脉夹层的检测准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(3_suppl):S32-S39. doi: 10.1177/2048872620901831. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
D-dimer for screening of aortic dissection in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.D-二聚体对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者主动脉夹层的筛查作用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.024. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
7
Pre-Test Probability Assessment and d-Dimer Based Evaluation in Patients with Previous Acute Aortic Syndrome.既往急性主动脉综合征患者的预检测概率评估和 D-二聚体评估。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 10;59(3):548. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030548.
8
Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer for Diagnostic Rule-out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes.主动脉夹层检测风险评分加 D-二聚体对疑似急性主动脉综合征的诊断排除规则的系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;27(10):1013-1027. doi: 10.1111/acem.13969. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
9
Potential of unenhanced computed tomography as a screening tool for acute aortic syndromes.增强 CT 对急性主动脉综合征筛查的作用。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Dec 6;10(9):967-975. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab069.
10
Combined use of aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer in the diagnostic workup of suspected acute aortic dissection.主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体联合应用于疑似急性主动脉夹层的诊断检查
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;175(1):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.257. Epub 2014 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer for acute aortic syndromes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯或联合 D-二聚体检测主动脉夹层检测风险评分对急性主动脉综合征的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0304401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304401. eCollection 2024.
2
Low D-dimer in acute coronary syndrome and heart failure: Screening for large vessel diseases in patients with chest symptoms.急性冠状动脉综合征和心力衰竭中的低D-二聚体:对有胸部症状患者的大血管疾病筛查
Heliyon. 2024 May 14;10(10):e31210. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31210. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score: A Clinical Decision Rule That Needs Some Parenting.主动脉夹层检测风险评分:一项需要精心呵护的临床决策规则。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):695-697. doi: 10.1111/acem.13636. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes: The ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study.主动脉夹层检测风险评分加 D-二聚体对急性主动脉综合征的诊断准确性:ADvISED 前瞻性多中心研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 16;137(3):250-258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029457. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
3
Admission D-dimer testing for differentiating acute aortic dissection from other causes of acute chest pain.
A Novel Tool for Distinguishing Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome from Heart Failure and Acute Coronary Syndrome.
一种区分A型急性主动脉综合征与心力衰竭和急性冠状动脉综合征的新型工具。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 18;13(22):3472. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223472.
入院时进行D-二聚体检测以鉴别急性主动脉夹层与其他急性胸痛病因。
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Apr 1;13(3):591-596. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.67280. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
4
Acute aortic syndrome.急性主动脉综合征
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 May;5(3):188-93. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.04.05.
5
Diagnostic test accuracy of D-dimer for acute aortic syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies with 5000 subjects.D-二聚体对急性主动脉综合征的诊断准确性:22 项研究 5000 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 27;6:26893. doi: 10.1038/srep26893.
6
Accuracy of a diagnostic strategy combining aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome.疑似急性主动脉综合征患者中联合主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体水平的诊断策略的准确性
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Aug;6(5):371-378. doi: 10.1177/2048872615594497. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
7
Management of acute aortic dissection.急性主动脉夹层的处理。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 28;385(9970):800-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61005-9. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
8
D-dimer as a biomarker for acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.D-二聚体作为急性主动脉夹层的生物标志物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(4):e471. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000471.
9
Management of acute aortic syndrome.急性主动脉综合征的管理。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Feb;12(2):103-14. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.203. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
10
2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2014年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)主动脉疾病诊断和治疗指南:涵盖成人胸主动脉和腹主动脉急慢性疾病的文件。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)主动脉疾病诊断和治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. Epub 2014 Aug 29.