• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往急性主动脉综合征患者的预检测概率评估和 D-二聚体评估。

Pre-Test Probability Assessment and d-Dimer Based Evaluation in Patients with Previous Acute Aortic Syndrome.

机构信息

S.C. Medicina d'Urgenza U (MECAU), Ospedale Molinette, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 10;59(3):548. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030548.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59030548
PMID:36984549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10057941/
Abstract

. Acute aortic syndromes (AASs) are emergencies burdened by high morbidity and mortality. Guideline-recommended diagnostic workup is based on pre-test probability assessment (PPA) and d-dimer testing. However, the performance of PPA and d-dimer has never been studied in individuals with previous AAS (pAAS), which represent a challenging population. . We analyzed a registry of patients with pAAS evaluated in two Emergency Departments (EDs) for suspected novel AAS (nAAS). Enrolment criteria were history of pAAS and the presence of truncal pain, syncope or perfusion deficit. All patients underwent advanced imaging. Clinical data were registered prospectively and PPA was performed by applying the aortic dissection detection (ADD) and an aorta simplified (AORTAs) score. . A total of 128 patients were enrolled, including 77 patients with previous Stanford type A aortic dissection and 45 patients with previous Stanford type B aortic dissection. The final diagnosis was nAAS in 40 (31%) patients. Clinical variables associated with nAAS were: aortic valve disease, thoracic aortic aneurysm, severe pain, sudden pain, ripping/tearing pain and hypotension/shock. ADD score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 83% for nAAS; AORTAs score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 48% and a specificity of 88%. d-dimer (cutoff ≥ 500 ng/mL or age-adjusted cutoff) had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 13%/14.7%, for diagnosis of nAAS. Patients that were candidates for guideline-compliant PPA/d-dimer integrated rule-out were: 5 (4.9%) with ADD ≤ 1/d-dimer and 8 (7.8%) with AORTAs ≤ 1/d-dimer < age-adjusted cutoff. None of them had a nAAS. . Patients with pAAS evaluated in the ED for red-flag symptoms showed intermediate-to-high pre-test probability of nAAS. The ADD score had lower sensitivity and specificity than in unselected patients. d-dimer, alone and integrated with PPA, was highly sensitive for nAAS, but very unspecific. PPA/d-dimer integrated strategies are unlikely to significantly reduce the number of patients with pAAS undergoing advanced imaging.

摘要

急性主动脉综合征(AAS)是一种发病率和死亡率都很高的急症。指南推荐的诊断方法基于术前概率评估(PPA)和 D-二聚体检测。然而,PPA 和 D-二聚体在有既往 AAS(pAAS)病史的患者中的表现从未被研究过,这些患者代表了一个具有挑战性的人群。我们分析了在两个急诊部(ED)就诊的疑似新发 AAS(nAAS)患者的 pAAS 登记数据。入组标准为有 pAAS 病史和躯干疼痛、晕厥或灌注不足。所有患者均接受了高级影像学检查。临床数据前瞻性登记,应用主动脉夹层检测(ADD)和简化主动脉评分(AORTAs)进行 PPA。共纳入 128 例患者,其中 77 例为既往 Stanford 型 A 型主动脉夹层,45 例为既往 Stanford 型 B 型主动脉夹层。最终诊断为 40 例(31%)nAAS。与 nAAS 相关的临床变量为:主动脉瓣疾病、胸主动脉瘤、剧烈疼痛、突发疼痛、撕裂样疼痛和低血压/休克。ADD 评分≥2 时,nAAS 的敏感性为 65%,特异性为 83%;AORTAs 评分≥2 时,敏感性为 48%,特异性为 88%。D-二聚体(截断值≥500ng/ml 或年龄校正截断值)对 nAAS 的诊断敏感性为 97%,特异性为 13%/14.7%。符合指南的 PPA/D-二聚体综合排除标准的患者为:ADD≤1/D-二聚体且<年龄校正截断值的患者 5 例(4.9%),AORTAs≤1/D-二聚体<年龄校正截断值的患者 8 例(7.8%)。他们均未发生 nAAS。在 ED 就诊的有红色警报症状的 pAAS 患者,新发 AAS 的术前概率为中高度。ADD 评分的敏感性和特异性均低于未选择的患者。D-二聚体单独或与 PPA 联合应用对 nAAS 高度敏感,但特异性很低。PPA/D-二聚体综合策略不太可能显著减少接受高级影像学检查的 pAAS 患者数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/10057941/e6955f64b4f6/medicina-59-00548-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/10057941/1f128602e6b2/medicina-59-00548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/10057941/807675deace1/medicina-59-00548-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/10057941/e6955f64b4f6/medicina-59-00548-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/10057941/1f128602e6b2/medicina-59-00548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/10057941/807675deace1/medicina-59-00548-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc4/10057941/e6955f64b4f6/medicina-59-00548-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Pre-Test Probability Assessment and d-Dimer Based Evaluation in Patients with Previous Acute Aortic Syndrome.既往急性主动脉综合征患者的预检测概率评估和 D-二聚体评估。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 10;59(3):548. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030548.
2
Development and Validation of a Simplified Probability Assessment Score Integrated With Age-Adjusted d-Dimer for Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes.简化的概率评估评分与年龄校正 D-二聚体联合应用于急性主动脉综合征的诊断:开发与验证。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):e018425. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018425. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes: The ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study.主动脉夹层检测风险评分加 D-二聚体对急性主动脉综合征的诊断准确性:ADvISED 前瞻性多中心研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 16;137(3):250-258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029457. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
4
Accuracy of a diagnostic strategy combining aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome.疑似急性主动脉综合征患者中联合主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体水平的诊断策略的准确性
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Aug;6(5):371-378. doi: 10.1177/2048872615594497. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
5
Diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes with ultrasound and d-dimer: the PROFUNDUS study.超声和 D-二聚体联合诊断急性主动脉综合征:PROFUNDUS 研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2024 Oct;128:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.029. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score and D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes in the Chinese Population: Exploration of Optimal Thresholds and Integrated Diagnostic Value.中国人群急性主动脉综合征的主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体:最佳阈值及综合诊断价值探索
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023 Aug;16(4):886-895. doi: 10.1007/s12265-023-10354-0. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
7
Integration of transthoracic focused cardiac ultrasound in the diagnostic algorithm for suspected acute aortic syndromes.经胸聚焦心脏超声在疑似急性主动脉综合征诊断算法中的整合。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 21;40(24):1952-1960. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz207.
8
Combined use of aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer in the diagnostic workup of suspected acute aortic dissection.主动脉夹层检测风险评分与D-二聚体联合应用于疑似急性主动脉夹层的诊断检查
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;175(1):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.257. Epub 2014 May 2.
9
Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer for Diagnostic Rule-out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes.主动脉夹层检测风险评分加 D-二聚体对疑似急性主动脉综合征的诊断排除规则的系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;27(10):1013-1027. doi: 10.1111/acem.13969. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
What Is the Specificity of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in a Low-prevalence Population?主动脉夹层检测风险评分在低发人群中的特异性如何?
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):632-638. doi: 10.1111/acem.13634. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in Acute Aortic Dissection: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Mortality.生物标志物在急性主动脉夹层中的预后价值:临床结局与死亡率分析
Emerg Med Int. 2025 Mar 18;2025:6664490. doi: 10.1155/emmi/6664490. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
2
Misdiagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Disease Occurs Commonly in Emergency Transfers.急诊转院中常出现胸主动脉疾病的误诊。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Dec;114(6):2202-2208. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
Acute Aortic Syndrome Revisited: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.
再探急性主动脉综合征:美国心脏病学会杂志最新综述
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 23;78(21):2106-2125. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.022.
4
Development and Validation of a Simplified Probability Assessment Score Integrated With Age-Adjusted d-Dimer for Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes.简化的概率评估评分与年龄校正 D-二聚体联合应用于急性主动脉综合征的诊断:开发与验证。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):e018425. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018425. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes in the emergency department.急诊科急性主动脉综合征的诊断与处理。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;16(1):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02354-8. Epub 2020 May 1.
6
Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer for Diagnostic Rule-out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes.主动脉夹层检测风险评分加 D-二聚体对疑似急性主动脉综合征的诊断排除规则的系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;27(10):1013-1027. doi: 10.1111/acem.13969. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯使用主动脉夹层检测风险评分与联合 D-二聚体检测对主动脉夹层的检测准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(3_suppl):S32-S39. doi: 10.1177/2048872620901831. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
8
Differential clinical features and long-term prognosis of acute aortic syndrome according to disease entity.根据疾病类型的不同,急性主动脉综合征的临床特征和长期预后也不同。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 21;40(32):2727-2736. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz153.
9
Long-term Follow up of Patients with Acute Aortic Syndromes: Relevance of both Aortic and Non-aortic Events.急性主动脉综合征患者的长期随访:主动脉和非主动脉事件的相关性。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;56(2):200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Unrecognized Cardiovascular Emergencies Among Medicare Patients.医保患者中未识别的心血管急症。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 1;178(4):477-484. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8628.