• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医学临床运营和临床照护的绿色化,我们从何处着手?工具包和辅助手段的范围综述。

Greening Family Medicine clinic operations and clinical care, where do we start? A scoping review of toolkits and aids.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2023 May 31;40(3):473-485. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad006.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmad006
PMID:36730055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10231359/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a pressing need for healthcare to respond to the climate crisis. Family physicians, given their central role in community healthcare provision, are strategically placed to lead, support, and promote sustainable healthcare, yet guidance on how to do this is fragmented.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and evaluate toolkits and aids on sustainable healthcare to act as a curated resource for family physicians and their care teams interested in delivering evidence-based sustainable healthcare in their clinical practices.

METHODS

A scoping review was completed of the published and grey literature across 4 databases and 2 search engines to identify articles and aids/toolkits from 1990 to present. Toolkits were subsequently evaluated for purpose, evidence-base, implementation process, adaptability to family medicine, and outcome measures.

RESULTS

The search identified 17,751 articles. Screening resulted in 20 published articles and 11 toolkits. Most articles presented simple checklists to support greening clinic initiatives, 3 studies focussed on partial carbon footprint analyses, and 4 on educational initiatives. Toolkits ranged in sustainability topics and degree of depth covered, and adaptability and outcome measures. None of the resources identified have been formally evaluated for effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

A range of aids exist to support greening of clinic operations; however, there is a significant gap in the literature for greening clinical care. Two toolkits were found to be comprehensive, one requiring tracking and reporting of sustainability initiatives. This scoping review provides a starting point for motivated family doctors and community clinics to initiate change and support more sustainable healthcare.

摘要

背景

医疗保健迫切需要应对气候危机。家庭医生在社区医疗服务中发挥着核心作用,他们具有战略性地位,可以领导、支持和促进可持续的医疗保健,但关于如何做到这一点的指导意见却很零散。

目的

确定并评估可持续医疗保健工具包和辅助工具,为有兴趣在临床实践中提供基于证据的可持续医疗保健的家庭医生及其护理团队提供一个精选资源。

方法

对 4 个数据库和 2 个搜索引擎中的已发表文献和灰色文献进行了范围综述,以确定 1990 年至今发表的文章和辅助工具/工具包。随后,对工具包的目的、证据基础、实施过程、对家庭医学的适应性和结果衡量标准进行了评估。

结果

搜索共确定了 17751 篇文章。筛选后得到 20 篇已发表文章和 11 个工具包。大多数文章提供了支持绿色诊所倡议的简单清单,3 项研究侧重于部分碳足迹分析,4 项研究侧重于教育计划。工具包涵盖的可持续性主题和深度范围以及适应性和结果衡量标准各不相同。没有一个确定的资源已被正式评估其有效性。

结论

有一系列辅助工具可用于支持诊所运营的绿化;然而,在绿化临床护理方面,文献中存在着显著的差距。发现了两个全面的工具包,其中一个需要跟踪和报告可持续性倡议。本范围综述为有积极性的家庭医生和社区诊所提供了一个起点,以启动变革并支持更可持续的医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035c/10231359/aac524964d98/cmad006_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035c/10231359/aac524964d98/cmad006_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/035c/10231359/aac524964d98/cmad006_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Greening Family Medicine clinic operations and clinical care, where do we start? A scoping review of toolkits and aids.家庭医学临床运营和临床照护的绿色化,我们从何处着手?工具包和辅助手段的范围综述。
Fam Pract. 2023 May 31;40(3):473-485. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad006.
2
Primary healthcare's carbon footprint and sustainable strategies to mitigate its contribution: a scoping review.初级医疗保健的碳足迹及其减轻影响的可持续策略:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1630. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12068-8.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: "Unless the toolkit is used it won't help solve the problem".一项关于临床医生和社区成员对干预工具包看法的定性研究:“除非使用工具包,否则无助于解决问题”。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2413-y.
5
Scoping review of toolkits as a knowledge translation strategy in health.作为健康领域知识转化策略的工具包范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 24;14:121. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0121-7.
6
'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review.支持患者及家属参与医疗决策的“实用”资源:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 15;14:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-175.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Focus on patient perspectives in climate action policies for healthcare. A German survey analysis on what patients are willing to do.关注医疗保健领域气候行动政策中的患者视角。一项关于患者意愿的德国调查分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;12:1477313. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477313. eCollection 2024.
10
The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review.作为将证据整合到临床护理中的知识转化策略的工具包的有效性:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006808.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary healthcare's carbon footprint and sustainable strategies to mitigate its contribution: a scoping review.初级医疗保健的碳足迹及其减轻影响的可持续策略:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1630. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12068-8.
2
Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的策略和方法:系统评价。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 8;387:e081284. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081284.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the carbon footprint of primary care practices? A retrospective life-cycle analysis in Switzerland.初级医疗实践的碳足迹是多少?瑞士的一项回顾性生命周期分析。
Environ Health. 2022 Jan 4;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00814-y.
2
Development and Assessment of a Brazilian Pilot Massive Open Online Course in Planetary Health Education: An Innovative Model for Primary Care Professionals and Community Training.巴西行星健康教育大规模开放式在线课程的开发与评估:基层医疗专业人员和社区培训的创新模式。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:663783. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.663783. eCollection 2021.
3
Acting on climate change for a healthier future: Critical role for primary care in Canada.
为更健康的未来应对气候变化:加拿大初级医疗保健的关键作用。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Oct;67(10):725-730. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6710725.
4
A Scoping Review of Interventions for the Treatment of Eco-Anxiety.生态焦虑症治疗干预措施的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 13;18(18):9636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189636.
5
Development and use of a toolkit to facilitate implementation of an evidence-based intervention: a descriptive case study.促进循证干预措施实施的工具包的开发与应用:一项描述性案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Oct 6;1:86. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00081-x. eCollection 2020.
6
The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment.医疗保健的环境足迹:全球评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Jul;4(7):e271-e279. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2.
7
Advocating for planetary health in medical education.在医学教育中倡导地球健康。
Can Fam Physician. 2020 Apr;66(4):235-238.
8
Our fight against climate change.我们应对气候变化的斗争。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Nov;65(11):766.
9
Family Medicine Patient and Physician Attitudes Toward Climate Change and Health in Wisconsin.威斯康星州家庭医学患者与医生对气候变化和健康的态度
Wilderness Environ Med. 2019 Dec;30(4):386-393. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Promoting environmental sustainability, equity and health in Victorian Primary Care Partnerships.促进维多利亚州初级保健合作中的环境可持续性、公平和健康。
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Apr;31(2):298-308. doi: 10.1002/hpja.281. Epub 2019 Aug 10.