• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的策略和方法:系统评价。

Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia

NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 2024 Oct 8;387:e081284. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081284.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-081284
PMID:39379104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11459334/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the international literature and assess the ways healthcare systems are mitigating and can mitigate their carbon footprint, which is currently estimated to be more than 4.4% of global emissions.

DESIGN

Systematic review of empirical studies and grey literature to examine how healthcare services and institutions are limiting their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

DATA SOURCES

Eight databases and authoritative reports were searched from inception dates to November 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Teams of investigators screened relevant publications against the inclusion criteria (eg, in English; discussed impact of healthcare systems on climate change), applying four quality appraisal tools, and results are reported in accordance with PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses).

RESULTS

Of 33 737 publications identified, 32 998 (97.8%) were excluded after title and abstract screening; 536 (72.5%) of the remaining publications were excluded after full text review. Two additional papers were identified, screened, and included through backward citation tracking. The 205 included studies applied empirical (n=88, 42.9%), review (n=60, 29.3%), narrative descriptive (n=53, 25.9%), and multiple (n=4, 2.0%) methods. More than half of the publications (51.5%) addressed the macro level of the healthcare system. Nine themes were identified using inductive analysis: changing clinical and surgical practices (n=107); enacting policies and governance (n=97); managing physical waste (n=83); changing organisational behaviour (n=76); actions of individuals and groups (eg, advocacy, community involvement; n=74); minimising travel and transportation (n=70); using tools for measuring GHG emissions (n=70); reducing emissions related to infrastructure (n=63); and decarbonising the supply chain (n=48).

CONCLUSIONS

Publications presented various strategies and tactics to reduce GHG emissions. These included changing clinical and surgical practices; using policies such as benchmarking and reporting at a facility level, and financial levers to reduce emissions from procurement; reducing physical waste; changing organisational culture through workforce training; supporting education on the benefits of decarbonisation; and involving patients in care planning. Numerous tools and frameworks were presented for measuring GHG emissions, but implementation and evaluation of the sustainability of initiatives were largely missing. At the macro level, decarbonisation approaches focused on energy grid emissions, infrastructure efficiency, and reducing supply chain emissions, including those from agriculture and supply of food products. Decarbonisation mechanisms at the micro and meso system levels ranged from reducing low value care, to choosing lower GHG options (eg, anaesthetic gases, rescue inhalers), to reducing travel. Based on these strategies and tactics, this study provides a framework to support the decarbonisation of healthcare systems.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42022383719.

摘要

目的

综述国际文献,评估医疗体系减轻和可以减轻碳足迹的方法,目前医疗体系的碳足迹估计超过全球排放量的 4.4%。

设计

系统综述实证研究和灰色文献,以研究医疗服务和机构如何限制其温室气体(GHG)排放。

数据来源

从各数据库和权威报告的起始日期搜索到 2023 年 11 月。

入选研究的标准

研究小组根据纳入标准筛选相关出版物(例如,英文;讨论医疗体系对气候变化的影响),应用四项质量评估工具,并按照 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)报告结果。

结果

在确定的 33737 篇文献中,经过标题和摘要筛选后,有 32998 篇(97.8%)被排除;在全文审查后,又有 536 篇(72.5%)被排除。通过回溯引文追踪,又确定并纳入了另外 2 篇论文。纳入的 205 项研究应用了实证(n=88,42.9%)、综述(n=60,29.3%)、叙述性描述(n=53,25.9%)和多方法(n=4,2.0%)。超过一半的出版物(51.5%)涉及医疗体系的宏观层面。使用归纳分析确定了 9 个主题:改变临床和手术实践(n=107);制定政策和治理(n=97);管理物理废物(n=83);改变组织行为(n=76);个人和团体的行动(例如,倡导、社区参与;n=74);减少旅行和交通(n=70);使用测量温室气体排放的工具(n=70);减少与基础设施相关的排放(n=63);以及供应链脱碳(n=48)。

结论

出版物提出了各种减少温室气体排放的策略和战术。这些策略包括改变临床和手术实践;利用基准测试和设施级报告等政策,以及采购减排的财务杠杆,减少排放;减少物理废物;通过员工培训改变组织文化;支持关于脱碳益处的教育;并让患者参与护理计划。提出了许多工具和框架来测量温室气体排放,但对倡议的可持续性的实施和评估在很大程度上被忽视了。在宏观层面,脱碳方法侧重于能源网排放、基础设施效率和减少供应链排放,包括农业和食品供应的排放。微观和中观系统层面的脱碳机制从减少低价值护理到选择低 GHG 选项(例如,麻醉气体、抢救吸入器),再到减少旅行。基于这些策略和战术,本研究提供了一个支持医疗体系脱碳的框架。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO:CRD42022383719。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/6bf10c173034/braj081284.f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/18c6d20f14c1/braj081284.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/c267e318f34e/braj081284.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/f89894da7bc8/braj081284.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/f0d6c052f55c/braj081284.f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/6bf10c173034/braj081284.f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/18c6d20f14c1/braj081284.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/c267e318f34e/braj081284.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/f89894da7bc8/braj081284.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/f0d6c052f55c/braj081284.f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cd4/11459334/6bf10c173034/braj081284.f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的策略和方法:系统评价。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 8;387:e081284. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081284.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Planetary Health and Hospitals' Contribution-A Scoping Review.行星健康与医院的贡献——范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13536. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013536.
5
The Role of Virtual Consulting in Developing Environmentally Sustainable Health Care: Systematic Literature Review.虚拟咨询在发展环境可持续医疗保健中的作用:系统文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 3;25:e44823. doi: 10.2196/44823.
6
A Review of the Applicability of Current Green Practices in Healthcare Facilities.当前绿色实践在医疗保健设施中适用性的综述
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6947. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6947. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
7
The carbon footprint of healthcare settings: A systematic review.医疗机构的碳足迹:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Aug;79(8):2830-2844. doi: 10.1111/jan.15671. Epub 2023 May 17.
8
Clinician and health service interventions to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions generated by healthcare: a systematic review.临床医生和卫生服务干预措施以减少医疗保健产生的温室气体排放:系统评价。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Sep 20;29(5):300-312. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112707.
9
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
10
Behavioural change interventions encouraging clinicians to reduce carbon emissions in clinical activity: a systematic review.行为改变干预措施鼓励临床医生减少临床活动中的碳排放:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09370-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainability in Cosmetic Dermatology: Moving Toward an Ecologically Responsible Future.美容皮肤科的可持续发展:迈向对生态负责的未来。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01488-x.
2
Climate change and environmental sustainability in emergency medicine: a narrative review.急诊医学中的气候变化与环境可持续性:一项叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2025 Jun 27;13(3):31. doi: 10.21037/atm-25-57. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
3
A Healthcare System's Path to Carbon Neutrality: Addressing Climate Change and Role of the Health Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Carbon Neutral Hand Surgery: Simple Changes to Reduce Carbon Footprint.碳中和手部手术:减少碳足迹的简单改变。
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Feb;32(1):108-112. doi: 10.1177/22925503221088839. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms.柳叶刀倒计时 2023 年健康与气候变化报告:在世界面临不可逆转损害的情况下,以健康为中心应对的紧迫性。
Lancet. 2023 Dec 16;402(10419):2346-2394. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Ecological Burden of Modern Surgery: An Analysis of Total Knee Replacement's Life Cycle.
医疗保健系统实现碳中和的路径:应对气候变化及医疗保健的作用。
AJPM Focus. 2025 Jun 6;4(4):100377. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100377. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Carbon footprint of Pars plana vitrectomies in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Germany between 2013 and 2023 - A cohort study of fluorinated gas emissions.2013年至2023年德国孔源性视网膜脱离患者行玻璃体切割术的碳足迹——一项关于氟化气体排放的队列研究
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06905-7.
5
Emergent climate protection strategies in German hospitals: A cluster analysis.德国医院的紧急气候保护策略:一项聚类分析。
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0312661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312661. eCollection 2025.
6
Green respiratory healthcare: what really matters.绿色呼吸健康护理:真正重要的是什么。
Thorax. 2025 Jul 15;80(8):500-503. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2025-223195.
7
Patient perspective on the climate health emergency.患者对气候健康紧急状况的看法。
Future Healthc J. 2025 Mar 31;12(1):100230. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100230. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Vestibular dysfunction: a hidden risk factor for Alzheimer's disease.前庭功能障碍:阿尔茨海默病的一个潜在危险因素。
J Neurol. 2025 Mar 25;272(4):285. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13045-9.
9
Primary healthcare's carbon footprint and sustainable strategies to mitigate its contribution: a scoping review.初级医疗保健的碳足迹及其减轻影响的可持续策略:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1630. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12068-8.
现代外科手术的生态负担:全膝关节置换术生命周期分析
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Sep 18;23:101187. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101187. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Respiratory Treatments: Results from the SABA CARBON International Study.呼吸治疗的温室气体排放:来自 SABA CARBON 国际研究的结果。
Adv Ther. 2023 Nov;40(11):4836-4856. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02663-2. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
Health-care systems' resource footprints and their access and quality in 49 regions between 1995 and 2015: an input-output analysis.1995 年至 2015 年间 49 个地区的卫生保健系统资源足迹及其可及性和质量:投入产出分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Sep;7(9):e747-e758. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00169-9.
6
Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues.一次性十二指肠镜:证据与未决问题。
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;13(8):1694. doi: 10.3390/life13081694.
7
Carbon footprint of industry-sponsored late-stage clinical trials.产业资助的晚期临床试验的碳足迹。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 21;13(8):e072491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072491.
8
An EAACI review: Go green in health care and research. Practical suggestions for sustainability in clinical practice, laboratories, and scientific meetings.一项 EAACI 综述:医疗保健和研究中的绿色行动。临床实践、实验室和科学会议中可持续性的实用建议。
Allergy. 2023 Oct;78(10):2606-2622. doi: 10.1111/all.15836. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
9
A Review of the Applicability of Current Green Practices in Healthcare Facilities.当前绿色实践在医疗保健设施中适用性的综述
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6947. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6947. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
10
Insights on the carbon footprint of radiotherapy in France.法国放射治疗碳足迹的研究进展。
Cancer Radiother. 2023 Sep;27(6-7):487-490. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Aug 8.