不同高强度跑步方案对抗阻训练效果的选择性影响。
Selective Effect of Different High-Intensity Running Protocols on Resistance Training Performance.
机构信息
Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
SPORT Research Group (CTS-1024), CERNEP Research Center, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
出版信息
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jun 1;37(6):e369-e375. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004392. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
Pérez-Castilla, A, García-Pinillos, F, Miras-Moreno, S, Ramirez-Campillo, R, García-Ramos, A, and Ruiz-Alias, SA. Selective effect of different high-intensity running protocols on resistance training performance. J Strength Cond Res 37(6): e369-e375, 2023-This study aimed to explore the acute effect of 2 high-intensity running protocols (high-intensity interval training [HIIT] and sprint interval training [SIT]) on resistance training (RT) performance and their combined effect on the lower-body maximal neuromuscular capacities. Eighteen healthy subjects randomly completed 3 experimental protocols: only RT, HIIT + RT, and SIT + RT. Characteristics of the RT protocol include 3 back-squat sets of 10 repetitions or 20% velocity loss against 60% of 1 repetition maximum with 3 minutes of interset rest. Characteristics of the high-intensity running protocols include HIIT (4 intervals of 4 minutes at ∼110% of functional threshold power with 3 minutes of interinterval rest) and SIT (6 all-out sprints of 30 seconds with 4 minutes and 24 seconds of interinterval rest). The force-velocity relationship (maximal values of force [ F0 ], velocity [ v0 ], and power [P max ]) was evaluated at the beginning and at the end of each experimental protocol. The number of back-squat repetitions ( p = 0.006; effect size [ES] = -0.96), fastest velocity ( p = 0.003; ES = -0.63), and average velocity ( p = 0.001; ES = -0.73) were lower for the SIT + RT protocol compared with the RT protocol, but no significant differences were observed between the RT and HIIT + RT ( p ≥T0.057; ES ≤.-0.46, except -0.82 for the number of back-squat repetitions) and HIIT + RT and SIT + RT ( p ≥T0.091; ES .0-0.35) protocols. The 3 protocols induced comparable decreases in v0 and P max ( F(2,34) 2,0.96; p ≥ 0.393), but F0 tended to decrease after the SIT + RT protocol and to increase after the RT and HIIT + RT protocols ( F(2,34) = 4.37; p = 0.035). Compared with RT alone, the data suggest that SIT deteriorates RT quality and F0 capacity more than long-interval HIIT.
佩雷斯-卡斯蒂利亚、A、加西亚-皮尼略斯、F、米拉姆斯-莫雷诺、S、拉米雷斯-坎皮洛、R、加西亚-拉莫斯、A 和鲁伊斯-阿里亚斯、SA。不同高强度跑步方案对阻力训练表现的选择性影响。J 力量与调节研究 37(6):e369-e375,2023-本研究旨在探讨 2 种高强度跑步方案（高强度间歇训练[HIIT]和冲刺间歇训练[SIT]）对阻力训练（RT）表现的急性影响及其对下肢最大神经肌肉能力的综合影响。18 名健康受试者随机完成 3 项实验方案：仅 RT、HIIT+RT 和 SIT+RT。RT 方案的特点包括 3 组深蹲，每组 10 次重复或 20%速度损失，对抗 60%的 1 次重复最大重量，每组之间休息 3 分钟。高强度跑步方案的特点包括 HIIT（4 组，每组 4 分钟，约 110%的功能阈值功率，每组之间休息 3 分钟）和 SIT（6 次全力冲刺，每次 30 秒，每组之间休息 4 分钟和 24 秒）。在每个实验方案开始和结束时，评估力-速度关系（最大力[F0]、速度[v0]和功率[Pmax]值）。与 RT 方案相比，SIT+RT 方案的深蹲重复次数（p=0.006；ES=-0.96）、最快速度（p=0.003；ES=-0.63）和平均速度（p=0.001；ES=-0.73）更低，但 RT 和 HIIT+RT（p≥T0.057；ES≤.-0.46，除了深蹲重复次数的-0.82）和 HIIT+RT 和 SIT+RT（p≥T0.091；ES0-0.35）方案之间没有显著差异。3 种方案均引起 v0 和 Pmax 相似的下降（F(2,34)2,0.96；p≥0.393），但 F0 在 SIT+RT 方案后趋于下降，而在 RT 和 HIIT+RT 方案后趋于上升（F(2,34)=4.37；p=0.035）。与单独 RT 相比，数据表明 SIT 比长间隔 HIIT 更能降低 RT 质量和 F0 能力。
Zotero 插件