• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用再通血管进行糖尿病足重建:突破血管病变下肢重建的界限

Use of Recanalized Vessels for Diabetic Foot Reconstruction: Pushing the Boundaries of Reconstruction in a Vasculopathic Lower Extremity.

作者信息

Suh Hyunsuk P, Kedar Daniel J, Lee Yeon Hoon, Lee Pil Hyung, Lee Seung-Whan, Hong Joon Pio

机构信息

From the Departments of Plastic Surgery.

Diabetic Center, Asan Medical Centerand.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Mar 1;151(3):485e-494e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009935. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009935
PMID:36730343
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Free flap after lower extremity revascularization may enable limb salvage in defects after critical limb ischemia. This study examined the outcomes of reconstruction of ischemic diabetic foot according to the severity of the vessel occlusion and assessed whether recanalized vessels may serve as a reliable recipient vessel.

METHODS

A total of 62 patients who underwent diabetic foot reconstruction with free flaps after successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) from February of 2010 to February of 2016 were identified and divided into three groups: group 1, nonoccluded vessels as recipient ( n = 11); group 2, recanalized artery after PTA for partially occluded artery ( n = 30); and group 3, recanalized artery after PTA for completely occluded artery ( n = 21).

RESULTS

Flap survival was statistically higher in group 2 (90%) compared with group 3 (67%) ( P < 0.05). Subsequent major amputation was significantly lower in groups 1 and 2 [0/7 and 1/30 (3.3%)] compared with group 3 [5/21 (23.8%)] ( P < 0.05). The patient survival and limb salvage rate was 90.9% at 1 and 3 years in group 1, 89.8% at 1 year and 86.3% at 3 and 5 years in group 2, and 76.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years in group 3. This difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.485).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of recanalized vessels after PTA can be safe for partially occluded arteries but requires caution for completely occluded arteries. Using completely occluded vessels after PTA can be attempted when other options are not available and achieves a 76% chance of limb salvage.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

摘要

背景

下肢血运重建术后的游离皮瓣可使严重肢体缺血后的肢体得以挽救。本研究根据血管闭塞的严重程度检查了缺血性糖尿病足重建的结果,并评估了再通血管是否可作为可靠的受区血管。

方法

确定了2010年2月至2016年2月期间在成功进行经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)后接受游离皮瓣糖尿病足重建的62例患者,并将其分为三组:第1组,以未闭塞血管作为受区(n = 11);第2组,部分闭塞动脉经PTA后再通的动脉(n = 30);第3组,完全闭塞动脉经PTA后再通的动脉(n = 21)。

结果

第2组皮瓣存活率(90%)在统计学上高于第3组(67%)(P < 0.05)。第1组和第2组随后的大截肢率显著低于第3组[0/7和1/30(3.3%)对比5/21(23.8%)](P < 0.05)。第1组1年和3年时患者生存率和肢体挽救率为90.9%,第2组1年时为89.8%,3年和5年时为86.3%,第3组1年、3年和5年时为76.2%。这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.485)。

结论

PTA后使用再通血管对部分闭塞动脉可能是安全的,但对完全闭塞动脉则需谨慎。当没有其他选择时,可尝试使用PTA后完全闭塞的血管,肢体挽救几率可达76%。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,III级

相似文献

1
Use of Recanalized Vessels for Diabetic Foot Reconstruction: Pushing the Boundaries of Reconstruction in a Vasculopathic Lower Extremity.利用再通血管进行糖尿病足重建:突破血管病变下肢重建的界限
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Mar 1;151(3):485e-494e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009935. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
2
Soft Tissue Reconstruction After Revascularization.血管化重建后的软组织重建。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2024 Mar;23(1):27-32. doi: 10.1177/15347346231210144. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3
Effect of systemic urokinase infusion after lower limb percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on limb salvage rate in patients with late-stage critical limb ischemia.下肢经皮腔内血管成形术后全身输注尿激酶对晚期严重肢体缺血患者肢体挽救率的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;48(4):414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
4
Angioplasty for diabetic patients with failing bypass graft or residual critical ischemia after bypass graft.针对搭桥移植失败或搭桥移植后仍存在严重残余缺血的糖尿病患者进行血管成形术。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Sep;36(3):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
5
What is the impact of infrapopliteal endovascular intervention on free flap survival in diabetic foot reconstruction?糖尿病足重建中,腘下血管腔内介入对游离皮瓣存活的影响是什么?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02173-9.
6
When is a technically successful peripheral angioplasty effective in preventing above-the-ankle amputation in diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia?对于患有严重肢体缺血的糖尿病患者,技术上成功的外周血管成形术在预防踝关节以上截肢方面何时有效?
Diabet Med. 2007 Aug;24(8):823-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02167.x. Epub 2007 Jun 8.
7
Successful Revascularization has a Significant Impact on Limb Salvage Rate and Wound Healing for Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis with a Multidisciplinary Approach.成功的血运重建对糖尿病足溃疡患者的保肢率和创面愈合有重大影响:多学科方法的单中心回顾性分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Oct;43(10):1449-1459. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02604-4. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
8
Editor's Choice - Diabetic Limb Salvage With Endovascular Revascularisation and Free Tissue Transfer: Long-Term Follow up.编辑精选 - 血管内血运重建和游离组织移植治疗糖尿病肢体缺血的保肢效果:长期随访结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;57(4):527-536. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.11.010. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
9
Clinical outcome of angiosome-oriented infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for isolated infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia.以血管体为导向的腘下经皮腔内血管成形术治疗严重肢体缺血患者孤立性腘下病变的临床结果
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):52-8. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.15129.
10
A comparison of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus amputation for critical limb ischemia in patients unsuitable for open surgery.经皮腔内血管成形术与截肢术治疗不适于开放手术的严重肢体缺血患者的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Feb;45(2):304-10; discussion 310-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Decades of Scientific Data and Global Media Reporting on Complications in Non-surgical Aesthetic Treatments for a Transparent Safety Profile: Kissing Snow White Awake.数十年科学数据及全球媒体对非手术美容治疗并发症的报道,以呈现透明的安全概况:唤醒白雪公主之吻。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05007-3.