• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术中供体准备方式对术后临床效果的影响。

Influence of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Patterns on Postoperative Clinical Outcome.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.

Institute for Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Germany; and.

出版信息

Cornea. 2023 Aug 1;42(8):940-945. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003141. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003141
PMID:36730372
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify preparation difficulties and complications during DMEK graft preparation and their influence on clinical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of 214 consecutive DMEK surgeries from the prospective Cologne DMEK database was performed between July 2018 and December 2019. Preparation conditions (such as central and peripheral adherences, tissue fragility, and Descemet membrane splitting) were quantified and divided into 3 groups: easy, difficult, and very difficult preparation. At follow-up (3, 6, and 12 months after DMEK), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count (ECC), and rebubbling rates were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

An easy preparation was possible in 41.6% of cases (group 1, n = 89), a difficult preparation of the DMEK graft occurred in 30.8% (group 2, n = 66), and a very difficult preparation occurred in 27.6% (group 3, n = 59). There was no difference between groups for best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3, 6, and 12 months ( P = 0.179, P = 0.325, and P = 0.682, respectively) or for ECC at 3 and 6 months ( P = 0.537 and P = 0.606, respectively). Only at 12 months, the ECC was slightly significant between groups ( P = 0.045). Regarding the rebubbling rate, there was no difference ( P = 0.585). 17.9% of eyes from group 1, 25.7% of eyes from group 2, and 23.7% of eyes from group 3 received at least 1 rebubbling.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that difficult preparation conditions do not lead to any worsening of visual acuity or rebubbling rate in the 1-year outcome after DMEK. The endothelial cell density at 12 months showed slightly poorer results in the cases of very difficult preparation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在量化 DMEK 移植物准备过程中的准备难度和并发症,并评估其对临床结果的影响。

方法

回顾性分析 2018 年 7 月至 2019 年 12 月间连续 214 例接受 DMEK 手术患者的前瞻性科隆 DMEK 数据库。评估和量化准备条件(如中央和周边粘连、组织易碎性和 Descemet 膜分离),并将其分为 3 组:容易、困难和非常困难的准备。在 DMEK 后 3、6 和 12 个月进行随访,评估和比较各组间最佳矫正视力、内皮细胞计数(ECC)和再注气率。

结果

41.6%(89 例)的病例可以进行容易的准备,30.8%(66 例)的病例为困难准备,27.6%(59 例)的病例为非常困难准备。在 3、6 和 12 个月时,最佳矫正视力( P = 0.179、P = 0.325 和 P = 0.682)或 ECC 在 3 和 6 个月时( P = 0.537 和 P = 0.606),各组之间均无差异。仅在 12 个月时,ECC 之间存在显著差异( P = 0.045)。关于再注气率,各组之间无差异( P = 0.585)。第 1 组中有 17.9%的眼、第 2 组中有 25.7%的眼和第 3 组中有 23.7%的眼至少接受了 1 次再注气。

结论

这些数据表明,在 DMEK 后 1 年的结果中,困难的准备条件不会导致视力或再注气率的恶化。在非常困难的准备情况下,12 个月时内皮细胞密度的结果略差。

相似文献

1
Influence of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Patterns on Postoperative Clinical Outcome.Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术中供体准备方式对术后临床效果的影响。
Cornea. 2023 Aug 1;42(8):940-945. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003141. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
2
The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.标准化 Descemet 撕囊自动化角膜内皮移植术与标准化 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术的前 100 只眼。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Nov;122(11):2193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
3
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术与超薄 Descemet 撕囊自动化角膜内皮移植术的比较:一项多中心随机对照临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Sep;127(9):1152-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.029. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
Clinical Outcome of Rebubbling for Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术后植片脱离再气泡形成的临床结果
Cornea. 2017 Jul;36(7):771-776. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001220.
5
Comparison of Pre-Descemet Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Endothelial Decompensation.预撕除内皮层的角膜内皮移植术与撕除内皮层的角膜内皮移植术治疗角膜内皮失代偿的比较。
Cornea. 2023 Mar 1;42(3):292-297. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003042. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
6
Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Descemetorhexis and Manual Descemetorhexis in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.飞秒激光辅助后弹力层撕除与手动后弹力层撕除在Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术中的比较
Cornea. 2017 Jul;36(7):767-770. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001217.
7
Three-Year Outcome Comparison Between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Manual Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.飞秒激光辅助与手动后弹力层内皮角膜移植术的三年疗效比较
Cornea. 2019 Jul;38(7):812-816. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001956.
8
DMEK versus DSAEK for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy: A meta-analysis.用于治疗富克斯内皮营养不良的 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术与深板层角膜内皮移植术的荟萃分析。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;29(1):15-22. doi: 10.1177/1120672118757431. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With Endothelium-Inward Technique: A Multicenter Clinical Study.影响内皮细胞向内技术预装板层角膜内皮移植术成功率的因素:一项多中心临床研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep;241:272-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
10
The need of rebubbling in case of small graft detachments after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).在 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)后,如果出现小的移植物脱离,需要重新复张。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;33(3):1347-1353. doi: 10.1177/11206721221146579. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual and ultrastructural analysis after splitting of recipient's Descemet membrane during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.在Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术中受体Descemet膜裂开后的视觉和超微结构分析
Eye (Lond). 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03872-5.