Archontakis Barakakis Paraschos, Kokkinidis Damianos G, Li Weijia, Nagraj Sanjana, Peppas Spyros, Kladas Michail, Schizas Dimitrios, Korantzopoulos Panagiotis, Ntaios George
Northeast Internal Medicine Associates, LaGrange, IN.
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023;57(10):1045-1053. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001796. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
Since the introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), "real-world" studies have investigated their safety profile on gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) when used by patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compile and summarize this data after Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
Medline and Embase were systematically searched until April 2021. Observational studies that met predefined inclusion criteria were included and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI were extracted. Subgroup analyses based on DOAC doses, history of chronic kidney disease, stroke, prior exposure to VKA (vitamin K antagonist), age, gender, geographic location of population samples, as well as Leave-One-Out and Low/Moderate Risk of Bias sensitivity analyses were performed. A random effects model was used.
A total of 46 studies were included. Apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of GIH compared with Dabigatran (HR: 0.67, 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81, I2 : 53.28%), Rivaroxaban (HR: 0.56, 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.70, I2 : 79.17%), and VKA (HR: 0.68, 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.78, I2 : 71.93%). Rivaroxaban was associated with increased GIH risk compared with Dabigatran (HR: 1.19, 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.40, I2 : 72.96%) and VKA (HR: 1.16, 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.27, I2 : 81.95%). Dabigatran was associated with similar GIH risk compared with VKA (HR: 1.11, 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.26, I2 : 87.28%).
Our study shows that Apixaban was associated with a reduction in GIH risk compared with Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban and VKA, whereas Rivaroxaban was associated with an increase in GIH risk compared with both Dabigatran and VKA.
自直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)问世以来,“真实世界”研究已调查了非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用DOACs时其在胃肠道出血(GIH)方面的安全性。我们按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行了一项系统评价和Meta分析,以汇总并总结这些数据。
对Medline和Embase进行了系统检索,直至2021年4月。纳入符合预定义纳入标准的观察性研究,并提取95%置信区间的风险比(HRs)。基于DOAC剂量、慢性肾脏病病史、中风、既往使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)史、年龄、性别、人群样本地理位置进行亚组分析,以及进行留一法分析和低/中度偏倚风险敏感性分析。采用随机效应模型。
共纳入46项研究。与达比加群相比,阿哌沙班与胃肠道出血风险降低相关(HR:0.67,95%CI:0.56至0.81,I²:53.28%);与利伐沙班相比(HR:0.56,95%CI:0.44至0.70,I²:79.17%);与VKA相比(HR:0.68,95%CI:0.60至0.78,I²:71.93%)。与达比加群相比,利伐沙班与胃肠道出血风险增加相关(HR:1.19,95%CI:1.02至1.40,I²:72.96%);与VKA相比(HR:1.16,95%CI:1.05至1.27,I²:81.95%)。与VKA相比,达比加群与胃肠道出血风险相似(HR:1.11,95%CI:0.98至1.26,I²:87.28%)。
我们的研究表明,与达比加群、利伐沙班和VKA相比,阿哌沙班与胃肠道出血风险降低相关;而与达比加群和VKA相比,利伐沙班与胃肠道出血风险增加相关。