Suppr超能文献

因胃肠道出血住院的无家可归患者的医疗保健差异:一项倾向匹配的州级分析。

Healthcare Disparities Among Homeless Patients Hospitalized With Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Propensity-Matched, State-Level Analysis.

作者信息

Subramanian Kavitha, Alayo Quazim A, Sedarous Mary, Nwaiwu Obioma, Okafor Philip N

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Division of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 1;57(7):707-713. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001742.

Abstract

GOALS

Examine outcomes among homeless patients admitted with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, including all-cause mortality and endoscopic intervention rates.

BACKGROUND

Hospitalizations among homeless individuals have increased steadily since at least 2007 but little is known about GI outcomes in these patients.

STUDY

The 2010-2014 Healthcare Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases from New York and Florida were used to identify adults admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute upper or lower GI bleed. Homeless patients were 1:3 matched with nonhomeless patients using a propensity-score greedy-matched algorithm. The primary outcome (all-cause in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (30-day readmission rates, endoscopy utilization, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs) were compared.

RESULTS

We matched 4074 homeless patients with 12,222 nonhomeless patients. Most hospitalizations for homeless individuals were concentrated in 113 (26.4%) of 428 hospitals. Homeless adults were more likely to be younger, male, African American or Hispanic, and on Medicaid. They experienced significantly higher odds of all-cause inpatient mortality compared with nonhomeless patients admitted with GI bleeding (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11-1.69). Endoscopy utilization rates were also lower for both upper (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.71) and lower (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.85) GI bleeding, though upper endoscopy rates within the first 24 hours were comparable (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23). Total hospitalization costs were lower ($9,715 vs. $12,173, P <0.001) while 30-day all-cause readmission rates were significantly higher in the homeless group (14.9% vs. 18.4%, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Homeless patients hospitalized for GI bleeding face disparities, including higher mortality rates and lower endoscopy utilization.

摘要

目标

研究因胃肠道(GI)出血入院的无家可归患者的治疗结果,包括全因死亡率和内镜干预率。

背景

至少自2007年以来,无家可归者的住院人数一直在稳步增加,但对于这些患者的胃肠道治疗结果知之甚少。

研究

利用2010 - 2014年纽约和佛罗里达州医疗保健利用项目(HCUP)的州住院数据库,确定以急性上消化道或下消化道出血为主要诊断入院的成年人。使用倾向得分贪婪匹配算法将无家可归患者与非无家可归患者按1:3进行匹配。比较主要结局(全因院内死亡率)和次要结局(30天再入院率、内镜检查利用率、住院时间和总住院费用)。

结果

我们将4074名无家可归患者与12222名非无家可归患者进行了匹配。无家可归者的大多数住院病例集中在428家医院中的113家(26.4%)。无家可归的成年人更可能较年轻、为男性、非裔美国人或西班牙裔,且参加医疗补助计划。与因胃肠道出血入院的非无家可归患者相比,他们全因住院死亡率的几率显著更高(比值比1.37,95%置信区间1.11 - 1.69)。上消化道(比值比0.62,95%置信区间0.55 - 0.71)和下消化道(比值比0.76,95%置信区间0.68 - 0.85)出血的内镜检查利用率也较低,不过前24小时内的上消化道内镜检查率相当(比值比1.11,95%置信区间1.00 - 1.23)。无家可归组的总住院费用较低(9715美元对12173美元,P <0.001),而30天全因再入院率显著更高(14.9%对18.4%,P <0.001)。

结论

因胃肠道出血住院的无家可归患者面临差异,包括更高的死亡率和更低的内镜检查利用率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验