• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染预测中的应用。

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2024 Jan;37(2):158-166. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761259. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1761259
PMID:36731501
Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for aseptic failure is associated with poor outcomes, patient morbidity, and high health care expenditures. The aim of this study was to develop novel machine learning algorithms for the prediction of PJI following revision TKA for patients with aseptic indications for revision surgery. A single-institution database consisting of 1,432 consecutive revision TKA patients with aseptic etiologies was retrospectively identified. The patient cohort included 208 patients (14.5%) who underwent re-revision surgery for PJI. Three machine learning algorithms (artificial neural networks, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors) were developed to predict this outcome and these models were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. This is a retrospective study. Among the three machine learning models, the neural network model achieved the best performance across discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.78), calibration, and decision curve analysis. The strongest predictors for PJI following revision TKA for aseptic reasons were prior open procedure prior to revision surgery, drug abuse, obesity, and diabetes. This study utilized machine learning as a tool for the prediction of PJI following revision TKA for aseptic failure with excellent performance. The validated machine learning models can aid surgeons in patient-specific risk stratifying to assist in preoperative counseling and clinical decision making for patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA.

摘要

假体周围关节感染(PJI)是翻修全膝关节置换术(TKA)治疗无菌性失败的常见并发症,它与不良预后、患者发病率和高额医疗费用有关。本研究旨在开发新的机器学习算法,以预测无菌性翻修 TKA 后发生 PJI 的风险。通过回顾性分析,我们确定了一个由 1432 例连续无菌性翻修 TKA 患者组成的单机构数据库。该患者队列包括 208 例(14.5%)因 PJI 而再次接受翻修手术的患者。我们开发了三种机器学习算法(人工神经网络、支持向量机、k-最近邻)来预测这一结果,并通过判别、校准和决策曲线分析评估这些模型。这是一项回顾性研究。在这三种机器学习模型中,神经网络模型在判别(接受者操作特征曲线下面积=0.78)、校准和决策曲线分析方面表现最佳。预测无菌性翻修 TKA 后发生 PJI 的最强预测因素是翻修前的开放性手术、药物滥用、肥胖和糖尿病。本研究利用机器学习作为一种工具,对无菌性翻修 TKA 后发生 PJI 的情况进行预测,表现出了优异的性能。经过验证的机器学习模型可以帮助外科医生对无菌性翻修 TKA 患者进行个体化风险分层,从而为患者提供术前咨询和临床决策支持。

相似文献

1
The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.人工智能在无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染预测中的应用。
J Knee Surg. 2024 Jan;37(2):158-166. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761259. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Machine learning models accurately predict recurrent infection following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection.机器学习模型能够准确预测假体周围关节感染翻修全膝关节置换术后的复发感染。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2582-2590. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06794-3. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.人工关节周围感染是现代膝关节置换术失败的主要原因:对11134例膝关节的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions.关节置换翻修术治疗假体周围关节感染的术后发病率和死亡率相对高于非感染性翻修术。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):521-526. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
5
Periprosthetic joint infection is the main reason for failure in patients following periprosthetic fracture treated with revision arthroplasty.人工关节周围感染是关节翻修术后治疗人工关节周围骨折患者失败的主要原因。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3565-3574. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03948-3. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
High Mortality After Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection is Related to Preoperative Morbidity and the Disease Process but Not Treatment.全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的高死亡率与术前合并症和疾病进程有关,而与治疗无关。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7):1383-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.046. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
7
Survivorship and Etiologies of Failure in Single-stage Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis.一期翻修治疗人工关节置换术后感染的生存状况和失败病因:一项荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 May 11;7(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00218. eCollection 2023 May 1.
8
Aseptic Reoperations Within 1 Year of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Markedly Increase the Risk of Later Periprosthetic Joint Infection.初次全膝关节置换术后 1 年内进行无菌再手术显著增加了后期发生假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3668-3672. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.054. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Revisions: A Preliminary Report.无菌性全髋关节或膝关节置换翻修术后延长口服抗生素预防:初步报告
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan;38(1):141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
10
Extended Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics with First-Generation Cephalosporin Do Not Reduce the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.第一代头孢菌素延长术后预防性使用抗生素并不能降低无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Knee Surg. 2020 Jun;33(6):597-602. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683889. Epub 2019 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Strategies for Preoperative PJI Diagnosis: Integrative Analysis of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers.术前人工关节感染(PJI)诊断的机器学习策略:血清和滑液标志物的综合分析
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Jul 31;18:10253-10265. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S499903. eCollection 2025.
2
Machine learning and transcriptomic analysis identify tubular injury biomarkers in patients with chronic kidney disease.机器学习和转录组分析可识别慢性肾病患者的肾小管损伤生物标志物。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04636-6.
3
Artificial intelligence for predicting 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective study.
人工智能预测股骨干骨折术后30天死亡率:一项回顾性研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;69(6):606-614. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1060_24. Epub 2025 May 14.
4
Imaging in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review.人工关节周围感染诊断中的影像学检查:综述
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 24;13(1):10. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010010.
5
Periprosthetic joint infections: navigating innovations and potential translation.人工关节周围感染:探索创新与潜在转化
Bone Joint Res. 2025 Jan 21;14(1):42-45. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.141.BJR-2024-0295.R1.
6
Predicting periprosthetic joint infection: external validation of preoperative prediction models.预测人工关节周围感染:术前预测模型的外部验证
J Bone Jt Infect. 2024 Oct 25;9(5):231-239. doi: 10.5194/jbji-9-231-2024. eCollection 2024.
7
Risk equations for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) in UK: a retrospective study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) AURUM and GOLD databases.英国人工关节感染(PJI)风险方程:使用临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)AURUM 和 GOLD 数据库的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e082501. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082501.