Division of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023 May;39(4):e3618. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3618. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
To investigate whether metabolic syndrome (MetS) could predict renal outcome in patients with established chronic kidney disease (CKD).
We enroled 2500 patients with CKD stage 1-4 from the Integrated CKD care programme, Kaohsiung for delaying Dialysis (ICKD) prospective observational study. 66.9% and 49.2% patients had MetS and diabetes (DM), respectively. We accessed three clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, RRT, and 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate events.
The MetS score was positively associated with proteinuria, inflammation, and nutrition markers. In fully adjusted Cox regression, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval) of MetS for composite renal outcome (renal replacement therapy, and 50% decline of renal function) in the DM and non-DM subgroups was 1.56 (1.15-2.12) and 1.31 (1.02-1.70), respectively, while that for all-cause mortality was 1.00 (0.71-1.40) and 1.27 (0.92-1.74). Blood pressure is the most important component of MetS for renal outcomes. In the 2 by 2 matrix, compared with the non-DM/non-MetS group, the DM/MetS group (HR: 1.62 (1.31-2.02)) and the non-DM/MetS group (HR: 1.33 (1.05-1.69)) had higher risks for composite renal outcome, whereas the DM/MetS group had higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR: 1.43 (1.09-1.88)).
MetS could predict renal outcome in patients with CKD stage 1-4 independent of DM.
研究代谢综合征(MetS)是否可预测已确诊慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的肾脏结局。
我们从高雄整合慢性肾脏病照护计划延缓透析(ICKD)前瞻性观察性研究中纳入了 2500 名 CKD 1-4 期患者。66.9%和 49.2%的患者分别患有 MetS 和糖尿病(DM)。我们评估了 3 种临床结局,包括全因死亡率、肾脏替代治疗(RRT)和估计肾小球滤过率下降 50%事件。
MetS 评分与蛋白尿、炎症和营养标志物呈正相关。在完全调整的 Cox 回归中,DM 和非 DM 亚组中 MetS 对复合肾脏结局(RRT 和肾功能下降 50%)的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间)分别为 1.56(1.15-2.12)和 1.31(1.02-1.70),而全因死亡率的 HR 为 1.00(0.71-1.40)和 1.27(0.92-1.74)。血压是 MetS 对肾脏结局最重要的组成部分。在 2×2 矩阵中,与非 DM/非 MetS 组相比,DM/MetS 组(HR:1.62(1.31-2.02))和非 DM/MetS 组(HR:1.33(1.05-1.69))发生复合肾脏结局的风险更高,而 DM/MetS 组全因死亡率的风险更高(HR:1.43(1.09-1.88))。
MetS 可预测 CKD 1-4 期患者的肾脏结局,独立于 DM。