Iwai Toshiki, Miyazaki Mariko, Yamada Gen, Nakayama Masaaki, Yamamoto Tae, Satoh Michihiro, Sato Hiroshi, Ito Sadayoshi
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sendai, Japan.
Division of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018 Apr;22(2):328-336. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1451-4. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, the difference in renal outcomes between DM patients with non-diabetic renal disease (DM and NDRD) and those with diabetic nephropathy (DN) is controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the differences among patients with DN, DM, and NDRD, and non-DM chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a prospective observational study.
We extracted the data of 2484 patients from 11 nephrology care centers and categorized into three groups as described above. The primary outcome was ESKD requiring renal replacement therapy.
During the median follow-up of 4.44 years, 281 patients (11.3%) developed ESKD. Renal outcomes of DM and NDRD patients were similar to those of non-DM patients (p ≥ 0.05). At CKD stage G3b, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of ESKD were 7.10 (2.46-20.49) in DN patients and 0.89 (0.19-4.24) in DM and NDRD. The annual change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in DN patients was significantly larger than that in other groups at stage G3b (-9.7%/year).
We found that DN patients have a higher risk for ESKD than DM and NDRD or non-DM patients. In particular, GFR rapidly declined in DN at stage G3b. DM and NDRD patients can accomplish equally beneficial renal outcomes as non-DM CKD, regardless of their similar metabolic profiles as DN. In conclusion, we should prudentially consider the risk stratification of DM whether cause or comorbidity of CKD.
糖尿病(DM)是终末期肾病(ESKD)的主要病因。然而,合并非糖尿病肾病(DM和NDRD)的糖尿病患者与糖尿病肾病(DN)患者的肾脏结局差异存在争议。本研究的目的是在前瞻性观察研究中评估DN、DM和NDRD患者以及非DM慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者之间的差异。
我们从11个肾脏病护理中心提取了2484例患者的数据,并按上述方法分为三组。主要结局是需要肾脏替代治疗的ESKD。
在中位随访4.44年期间,281例患者(11.3%)发生了ESKD。DM和NDRD患者的肾脏结局与非DM患者相似(p≥0.05)。在CKD G3b期,DN患者ESKD的风险比(95%置信区间)为7.10(2.46 - 20.49),DM和NDRD患者为0.89(0.19 - 4.24)。在G3b期,DN患者的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)年变化显著大于其他组(-9.7%/年)。
我们发现,DN患者发生ESKD的风险高于DM和NDRD患者或非DM患者。特别是,在G3b期DN患者的肾小球滤过率迅速下降。DM和NDRD患者可实现与非DM CKD患者同样有益的肾脏结局,尽管他们与DN患者有相似的代谢特征。总之,对于DM,无论其是CKD的病因还是合并症,我们都应谨慎考虑其风险分层。