Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Switzerland; University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;62(7):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.11.011. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Large-scale epidemiological research often uses self-reports to determine the prevalence of illicit substance use. Self-reports may suffer from inaccurate reporting but can be verified with objective measures. This study examined the following: the prevalence of illicit and non-medical substance use with self-reports and hair toxicology, the convergence of self-reported and objectively quantified substance use, and the correlates of under- and overreporting.
The data came from a large urban cohort study of young adults (n = 1,002, mean age = 20.6 years, 50% female). The participants provided 3 cm of hair (covering the previous 3 months) and reported their illicit and non-medical substance use and their sociodemographic, psychological, and behavioral characteristics. Hair toxicology analyses targeted cannabinoids, ketamine, opiates/opioids, stimulants including 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and relevant metabolites.
Self-reports underestimated the prevalence of most substances by 30% to 60% compared to hair tests. The average detection ratio (hair test/self-report) was 1.50. Hair tests were typically more sensitive than self-reports. Underreporting was associated with a low level of that substance in hair. Self-reported delinquency and psychopathology were correlated with an increased likelihood of concordant positive self-reports and hair tests compared to underreporting. Overreporting was associated with infrequent self-reported use.
Our study suggests that self-reports underestimate young adults' exposure to illicit substances and non-medical use of prescription drugs. Consequently, estimates of associations between substance use and risk factors or outcomes are likely biased. Combining self-reports with hair tests may be most beneficial in study samples with occasional substance use. Researchers can use specific factors (eg, detection ratios) to adjust prevalence estimates and correlations based on self-reports.
大规模的流行病学研究通常使用自我报告来确定非法物质使用的流行率。自我报告可能存在不准确的报告,但可以通过客观的措施来验证。本研究检验了以下内容:自我报告和毛发毒理学检测的非法和非医疗物质使用的流行率、自我报告和客观量化的物质使用的一致性,以及报告过少和报告过多的相关因素。
数据来自一项针对年轻成年人的大型城市队列研究(n=1002,平均年龄 20.6 岁,50%为女性)。参与者提供 3 厘米长的头发(涵盖过去 3 个月),并报告他们的非法和非医疗物质使用情况以及他们的社会人口学、心理和行为特征。毛发毒理学分析针对大麻素、氯胺酮、阿片类药物/类阿片、包括 3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺在内的兴奋剂,以及相关代谢物。
与毛发检测相比,自我报告将大多数物质的流行率低估了 30%至 60%。平均检测比(毛发检测/自我报告)为 1.50。毛发检测通常比自我报告更敏感。低水平的物质在毛发中的存在与报告过少有关。自我报告的犯罪行为和精神病理学与一致的阳性自我报告和毛发检测的可能性增加有关,而不是报告过少。报告过多与自我报告的使用频率较低有关。
我们的研究表明,自我报告低估了年轻人接触非法物质和非医疗使用处方药物的情况。因此,物质使用与风险因素或结果之间的关联估计可能存在偏差。将自我报告与毛发检测相结合,对于偶尔使用物质的研究样本可能最有益。研究人员可以使用特定的因素(例如,检测比)来根据自我报告调整流行率估计值和相关性。