Wakabayashi Yasushi, Kobayashi Masanori, Ichikawa Tomohide, Koyama Takashi, Abe Hidetoshi
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Matsumoto Kyoritsu Hospital Matsumoto Nagano Japan.
J Arrhythm. 2022 Dec 19;39(1):42-51. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12801. eCollection 2023 Feb.
The acute success rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon (CB) is reported to be lower in the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV). This study aimed to investigate the utility of the "balloon lever technique (BLT)" for RIPV CB ablation.
We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent CB-PVI for atrial fibrillation between February 21, 2020 and June 3, 2022. RIPV cryoablation was performed according to a specific protocol. The patients underwent RIPV cryoablation using the conventional method. If the method was found ineffective, BLT cryoablation was performed. The acute success rate of RIPV CB ablation was examined. We also investigated the RIPV isolation rate and procedural parameters during conventional and BLT cryoablation.
Ninety-three patients were included in the analysis. RIPV isolation was achieved in 89.2% (83/93) of the patients using conventional method and subsequent BLT cryoablation. Meanwhile, 68 patients underwent BLT cryoablation because the conventional method was ineffective. RIPV was isolated with BLT in 85.3% (58/68) of patients. Additionally, BLT was found to be superior to conventional cryoablation in terms of nadir balloon temperature, freezing time, and thawing time to a specific temperature in patients who underwent both conventional and BLT cryoablations.
BLT is useful in RIPV cryoablation when the conventional method is ineffective. BLT cryoablation may be helpful, mainly because of the BLT-mediated contact of the balloon with the bottom of the RIPV, which leads to optimal RIPV occlusion.
据报道,冷冻球囊(CB)进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)时,右下肺静脉(RIPV)的急性成功率较低。本研究旨在探讨“球囊杠杆技术(BLT)”在RIPV冷冻球囊消融中的应用价值。
我们回顾性研究了2020年2月21日至2022年6月3日期间连续接受CB-PVI治疗房颤的患者。RIPV冷冻消融按照特定方案进行。患者首先采用传统方法进行RIPV冷冻消融。如果发现该方法无效,则进行BLT冷冻消融。检查RIPV冷冻球囊消融的急性成功率。我们还研究了传统冷冻消融和BLT冷冻消融期间的RIPV隔离率和操作参数。
93例患者纳入分析。使用传统方法及后续BLT冷冻消融后,89.2%(83/93)的患者实现了RIPV隔离。同时,68例患者因传统方法无效而接受了BLT冷冻消融。85.3%(58/68)的患者通过BLT实现了RIPV隔离。此外,在同时接受传统冷冻消融和BLT冷冻消融的患者中,发现BLT在最低球囊温度、冷冻时间和解冻至特定温度的时间方面优于传统冷冻消融。
当传统方法无效时,BLT在RIPV冷冻消融中有用。BLT冷冻消融可能有帮助,主要是因为BLT介导球囊与RIPV底部接触,从而实现最佳的RIPV闭塞。