• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis术与传统胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis术治疗食管癌的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析

Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis.

作者信息

Hong Ziqiang, Gou Wenxi, Lu Yingjie, Wu Xusheng, Sheng Yannan, Cui Baiqiang, Bai Xiangdou, Jin Dacheng, Gou Yunjiu

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 17;12:1076014. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1076014. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.1076014
PMID:36733352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9886890/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical results of the modified Ivor-Lewis procedure, which preserves the azygous vein, thoracic duct and surrounding tissues, with the traditional Ivor-Lewis procedure, which removes these tissues, for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and evaluating whether the azygous vein, thoracic duct and surrounding tissues are required to be removed for the surgery of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients suffering from esophageal cancer treated by thoracic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis procedure admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from September 2017 to September 2019. According to the surgical method, they were divided into the modified thoracolaparoscopic Ivor-Lewis (modified group) and the traditional thoracolaparoscopic Ivor-Lewis (traditional group). Propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was applied to reduce the selection bias of confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 245 patients who suffered from esophageal cancer and underwent thoracic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis were enrolled in the study. There were 124 cases in the modified group and 121 cases in the traditional group. The discrepancies in the age and T-stage among patients in the traditional and modified groups were statistically significant. After PSM, the above-mentioned factors became statistically insignificant. There were 86 patients in each group after PSM. Compared with the traditional group, the modified group has shorter operative time (=0.007), less intraoperative bleeding (=0.003) and less postoperative 3 days chest drainage(=0.001), with a statistically significant difference. No significant difference in local recurrence (=0.721) and distant metastasis (=0.742) after surgery were found in the two groups, and the difference was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference in the 3-year postoperative survival rate (44.2% vs. 41.9%, =0.605) between the modified and traditional groups.

CONCLUSION

The modified Ivor-Lewis procedure, which preserves the azygous vein, thoracic duct, and surrounding tissue, reduces surgical trauma in esophageal cancer, has not increased postoperative recurrent metastases, while achieved the same long-term outcomes as expanded surgery.

摘要

目的

比较保留奇静脉、胸导管及周围组织的改良Ivor-Lewis手术与切除这些组织的传统Ivor-Lewis手术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的临床效果,评估食管癌手术是否需要切除奇静脉、胸导管及周围组织。

方法

回顾性分析2017年9月至2019年9月甘肃省人民医院胸外科收治的行胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis手术治疗的食管癌患者的临床资料。根据手术方式,将其分为改良胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis组(改良组)和传统胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis组(传统组)。采用倾向评分匹配分析(PSM)以减少混杂因素的选择偏倚。

结果

本研究共纳入245例行胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis手术的食管癌患者。改良组124例,传统组121例。传统组和改良组患者的年龄和T分期差异有统计学意义。PSM后,上述因素差异无统计学意义。PSM后每组各有86例患者。与传统组相比,改良组手术时间较短(=0.007)、术中出血量较少(=0.003)、术后3天胸腔引流量较少(=0.001),差异有统计学意义。两组术后局部复发(=0.721)和远处转移(=0.742)差异无统计学意义。改良组与传统组术后3年生存率(44.2%对41.9%,=0.605)差异也无统计学意义。

结论

保留奇静脉、胸导管及周围组织的改良Ivor-Lewis手术可减少食管癌手术创伤,未增加术后复发转移,同时取得了与扩大手术相同的长期疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b7/9886890/d8a8ea988312/fonc-12-1076014-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b7/9886890/751593682780/fonc-12-1076014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b7/9886890/92752d001995/fonc-12-1076014-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b7/9886890/d8a8ea988312/fonc-12-1076014-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b7/9886890/751593682780/fonc-12-1076014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b7/9886890/92752d001995/fonc-12-1076014-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b7/9886890/d8a8ea988312/fonc-12-1076014-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis.改良胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis术与传统胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis术治疗食管癌的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 17;12:1076014. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1076014. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.达芬奇机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术与 McKeown 食管切除术治疗中下段食管癌的临床疗效比较:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8271-8277. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14208-6. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
3
Corrigendum: Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis.勘误:改良胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis术与传统胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis术治疗食管癌的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 14;13:1216836. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1216836. eCollection 2023.
4
Efficacy and Quality of Life with the Modified Versus the Traditional Thoraco-Laparoscopic McKeown Procedure for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.改良与传统经胸腹腔镜 McKeown 手术治疗食管癌的疗效和生活质量比较:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8223-8230. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14033-x. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
5
Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Compared with open approach.微创 Ivor Lewis 食管胃吻合术治疗食管鳞癌的长期疗效:与开放手术相比。
Int J Surg. 2017 Sep;45:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.104. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for T2 middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.胸腔镜辅助下手术治疗 T2 期中下段胸段食管鳞癌
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 16;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1361-2.
7
[Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[Sweet术式与Ivor-Lewis术式治疗中下段食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):979-984.
8
Thoracoscopic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis surgery vs. McKeown surgery in the treatment of thoracic middle-lower segment esophageal cancer.胸腔镜腹腔镜 Ivor-Lewis 手术与 McKeown 手术治疗胸中段下段食管癌的比较。
J BUON. 2021 May-Jun;26(3):1062-1069.
9
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].[微创食管癌切除术中Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown术式的短期疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91.
10
[Comparative analysis on the classic and modified Ivor-Lewis procedure in the treatment of mid-low thoracic esophageal carcinoma].[经典与改良Ivor-Lewis手术治疗中下段胸段食管癌的对比分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;16(12):1180-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.达芬奇机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术与 McKeown 食管切除术治疗中下段食管癌的临床疗效比较:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8271-8277. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14208-6. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of esophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019.2019 年全球 204 个国家和地区食管癌发病和死亡负担及其归因危险因素分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;10:952087. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.952087. eCollection 2022.
2
Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.完全微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术后的手术结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;48(3):473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.119. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
3
The effect of age on short-term and mid-term outcomes after thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
年龄对胸腔镜Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术后短期和中期结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01435-5.
4
Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study.新辅助放化疗后微创与开放 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术的长期肿瘤学结局比较分析:倾向评分匹配的观察性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 6;16(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01728-z.
5
Effects of enteral nutrition support combined with enhanced recovery after surgery on the nutritional status, immune function, and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer after Ivor-Lewis operation.肠内营养支持联合术后加速康复对Ivor-Lewis术后食管癌患者营养状况、免疫功能及预后的影响
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Dec;12(12):7337-7345. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3410.
6
Global trends in the incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer from 1990 to 2017.全球 1990 年至 2017 年食管癌发病率和死亡率的变化趋势。
Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(18):6875-6887. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3338. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Comparison of Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Ivor-Lewis, Mckeown, or Sweet Esophagectomy.Ivor-Lewis、Mckeown 或 Sweet 食管癌根治术后患者长期生活质量比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):225-231. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3999-z. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Modified anastomotic technique for thoracolaparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: early outcomes and technical details.用于胸腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis食管切除术的改良吻合技术:早期结果及技术细节
Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 1;30(5):1-5. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow021.
9
Hybrid minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation yields excellent long-term survival outcomes with minimal morbidity.新辅助放化疗后行杂交微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术可获得极佳的长期生存结果,且并发症极少。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;114(7):838-847. doi: 10.1002/jso.24409. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
10
Survival After Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments Compared to Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis.新辅助和辅助治疗与单纯手术治疗可切除食管癌的生存率比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):481-491. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001905.