Suppr超能文献

复合神经传导评分和体征用于诊断和躯体分期糖尿病多发性神经病:北美中东部种族队列研究。

Composite nerve conduction scores and signs for diagnosis and somatic staging of diabetic polyneuropathy: Mid North American ethnic cohort survey.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2023 Jul;68(1):29-38. doi: 10.1002/mus.27793. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), the minimal nerve conduction (NC) criterion for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) was abnormality of NC in more than one peripheral nerve without specifying the attributes of NCs to be evaluated. In the present study, we assess individual and composite scores of NCs meeting the DCCT criterion and signs for improved diagnosis and assessment of DSPN severity.

METHODS

Evaluated were 13 attributes and 6 composite NC scores and signs and symptoms in 395 healthy subjects (HS) and 388 persons with diabetes (DM).

RESULTS

Percent abnormality between subjects with DM and HS was remarkably different among individual attributes and the six composite NC scores. For diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT criterion, assessment of conduction velocities (CVs) and distal latencies (DLs) provided sensitive diagnoses of DSPN. NC amplitudes provided stronger measures of severity. In studied cohorts, DSPN was staged: N0, no NC abnormality using NC score 2 (CVs and DLs), 60.0%; N1, NC abnormality only, 18.4%; N2, NC abnormality and signs of feet or legs, 16.3%; and N3, NC abnormality and signs of thighs, 5.3%.

DISCUSSION

For sensitive and standard diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT NC criterion, specifically defined composite scores of CVs and DLs, e.g., score 2, is recommended. A composite score of amplitudes, e.g., score 4, provides a stronger measure of neuropathy severity. Also, provided are HS reference values of evaluated attributes of NCs and estimates of staged severity of DSPN of mid North American DM cohorts.

摘要

简介/目的:在糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)中,糖尿病感觉运动性多发性神经病(DSPN)的最小神经传导(NC)标准是多个周围神经的 NC 异常,而没有具体说明要评估的 NC 属性。在本研究中,我们评估了符合 DCCT 标准的单个和复合 NC 评分以及体征,以改善 DSPN 的诊断和严重程度评估。

方法

评估了 13 个属性和 6 个复合 NC 评分以及体征和症状,涉及 395 名健康受试者(HS)和 388 名糖尿病患者(DM)。

结果

DM 患者和 HS 之间个体属性和 6 个复合 NC 评分之间的异常百分比差异非常大。使用 DCCT 标准诊断 DSPN 时,评估传导速度(CV)和远端潜伏期(DL)可提供 DSPN 的敏感诊断。NC 幅度提供了更强的严重程度指标。在所研究的队列中,DSPN 分期为:N0,NC 评分 2(CV 和 DL)无 NC 异常,占 60.0%;N1,仅 NC 异常,占 18.4%;N2,NC 异常和足部或腿部体征,占 16.3%;N3,NC 异常和大腿体征,占 5.3%。

讨论

为了使用 DCCT NC 标准进行敏感和标准的 DSPN 诊断,建议使用特定定义的 CV 和 DL 复合评分,例如评分 2。幅度的复合评分,例如评分 4,提供了更强的神经病变严重程度指标。此外,还提供了评估的 NC 属性的 HS 参考值以及北美中部 DM 队列中 DSPN 分期严重程度的估计。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验