Suppr超能文献

平均体循环充盈压可反映液体反应性和麻醉诱导下非应激血容量。

Mean systemic filling pressure indicates fluid responsiveness and anaesthesia-induced unstressed blood volume.

机构信息

Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang Province, PR of China.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(5):369-377. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.121003.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The mean systemic filling pressure (Pms) plays a central role for our understanding of the circulation. In a retrospective analysis of a clinical trial, we studied whether Pms indicates fluid responsiveness and whether Pms can indicate an anaesthesia-induced increase of the unstressed blood volume, which is the volume that does not increase the transmural pressure.

METHODS

An analogue to P ms based on cardiac output, the mean arterial pressure and the central venous pressure, abbreviated to P msa , were calculated in 86 patients before induction of general anaesthesia and before 3 successive bolus infusions of 3 mL kg -1 of colloid fluid. An increase in stroke volume of ≥ 10% from a bolus infusion indicated fluid responsiveness. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to find the optimal cut-off for P msa to indicate fluid responsiveness. Changes in blood volume were estimated from anthropometric data and the haemodilution.

RESULTS

Pmsa was lower in fluid responders than in non-responders before induction (13.2 ± 2.2 vs. 14.7 ± 2.7 mmHg; mean ± SD, P < 0.01) and after induction of general anaesthesia (11.4 ± 2.1 vs. 12.8 ± 2.1 mmHg; P < 0.006). ROC curves showed that 14 mmHg before anaesthesia and 12 mmHg after anaesthesia induction served as optimal cut-offs for P msa to indicate fluid responsiveness. A linear correlation between P msa and blood volume changes suggested that the anaesthesia increased the unstressed blood volume by 1.2 L.

CONCLUSIONS

P msa was lower in fluid responders than in non-responders. General anaesthesia increased the need for blood volume by 1.2 L.

摘要

目的

中心静脉压(Pms)均值在我们对循环的理解中起着核心作用。在一项临床试验的回顾性分析中,我们研究了 Pms 是否可以指示液体反应性,以及 Pms 是否可以指示麻醉诱导下非紧张血容量的增加,即不会增加跨壁压的容量。

方法

在 86 名患者全麻诱导前和连续 3 次 3ml/kg 胶体液冲击后,基于心输出量、平均动脉压和中心静脉压计算出类似 Pms 的平均动脉压(Pmsa)。从冲击后液体量中增加的 ≥ 10%的每搏量表示液体反应性。使用接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线来寻找最佳 Pmsa 截断值以指示液体反应性。通过人体测量数据和血液稀释来估计血容量的变化。

结果

在诱导前(13.2±2.2 比 14.7±2.7mmHg;均值±标准差,P<0.01)和全麻诱导后(11.4±2.1 比 12.8±2.1mmHg;P<0.006),液体反应者的 Pmsa 低于非反应者。ROC 曲线显示,麻醉前 14mmHg 和麻醉诱导后 12mmHg 是 Pmsa 指示液体反应性的最佳截断值。Pmsa 与血容量变化之间的线性相关性表明,麻醉增加了 1.2L 的非紧张血容量。

结论

液体反应者的 Pmsa 低于非反应者。全麻增加了 1.2L 的血容量需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e7/10156538/fb26897259c6/AIT-54-48144-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验