Gallo Paul, Roychoudhury Satrajit
Independent Consultant, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 May;57(3):515-520. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00499-0. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
Stopping an ongoing clinical trial based on an interim analysis that shows poor outcomes, often referred to as a judgment of "futility", is a familiar feature in current clinical trials practice. Interim data can be misleading, and the implications of prematurely terminating a trial that should not stop are severe. It is thus critical that designs allowing futility stopping be planned and implemented carefully and cautiously. A recent Phase III development program for aducanumab in Alzheimer's disease was halted based on a pre-defined futility guideline, yet based upon updated data and closer examination, the terminated studies became the basis for a regulatory submission. Not surprisingly, this situation generated much controversy and discussion. It provides a good basis for illustrating important principles governing the planning and implementation of futility schemes.
基于中期分析显示疗效不佳(通常称为“无效性”判断)而停止正在进行的临床试验,是当前临床试验实践中常见的情况。中期数据可能具有误导性,而提前终止本不应停止的试验所带来的影响是严重的。因此,至关重要的是,要谨慎且周密地规划和实施允许无效性终止的试验设计。最近一项用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的阿杜卡单抗的III期研发项目,基于预先定义的无效性准则而停止,但根据更新的数据和更深入的审查,已终止的研究成为了一份监管申报的基础。不出所料,这种情况引发了诸多争议和讨论。它为阐明无效性方案规划和实施的重要原则提供了一个很好的基础。