• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼科临床决策支持系统实施前后低视力康复服务利用情况

Low Vision Rehabilitation Service Utilization Before and After Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System in Ophthalmology.

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254006. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54006.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54006
PMID:36735257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9898817/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Electronic clinical decision support systems apply clinical guidelines in real time and offer a new approach to improve referral and utilization of low vision rehabilitation (LVR) care.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients and factors associated with LVR service utilization with and without the use of an electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support system (CDSS) alert.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Quality improvement study using EHR data to compare patients who did and did not utilize LVR service after referral between November 6, 2017, and October 5, 2019, (primary) and to assess overall service utilization rate from September 1, 2016, to April 2, 2021, regardless of referral status (secondary). Participants in the primary analysis were patients at a large ophthalmology department in an academic medical center in the US who received an LVR referral recommendation from their ophthalmologist according to the CDSS alert. The secondary analysis included patients with best documented visual acuity (BDVA) worse than 20/40 before, during, and after the CDSS implementation. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to April 2022.

EXPOSURES

Number and locations of referral recommendations for LVR service according to the CDSS alert in the primary analysis; active CDSS implementation in the secondary analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

LVR service utilization rate was defined as the number of patients who accessed service among those who were referred (primary) and among those with BDVA worse than 20/40 (secondary). EHR data on patient demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity) and ophthalmology encounter characteristics (numbers of referral recommendations, encounter location, and BDVA) were extracted.

RESULTS

Of the 429 patients (median [IQR] age, 71 [53 to 83] years; 233 female [54%]) who received a CDSS-based referral recommendation, 184 (42.9%) utilized LVR service. Compared with nonusers of LVR, users were more likely to have received at least 2 referral recommendations (12.5% vs 6.1%; χ21 = 5.29; P = .02) and at an ophthalmology location with onsite LVR service (87.5% vs 78.0%; χ21 = 6.50; P = .01). Onsite LVR service (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.18-3.61) persisted as the only statistically significant factor after adjusting for patient demographics and other referral characteristics. Among patients whose BDVA was worse than 20/40 before, during, and after the CDSS implementation regardless of referral status, the LVR service utilization rate was 6.1%, 13.8%, and 7.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this quality improvement study, ophthalmologist referral recommendations and onsite LVR services at the location where patients receive other ophthalmic care were significantly associated with service utilization. Ophthalmology CDSSs are promising tools to apply clinical guidelines in real time to improve connection to care.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26b3/9898817/bc5c55f87569/jamanetwopen-e2254006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26b3/9898817/bc5c55f87569/jamanetwopen-e2254006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26b3/9898817/bc5c55f87569/jamanetwopen-e2254006-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

电子临床决策支持系统实时应用临床指南,并提供了一种新方法来改善低视力康复(LVR)服务的转诊和利用。

目的

描述患者特征和与 LVR 服务利用相关的因素,包括使用电子健康记录(EHR)临床决策支持系统(CDSS)警报和不使用 EHR CDSS 警报的情况。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项质量改进研究,使用 EHR 数据比较了 2017 年 11 月 6 日至 2019 年 10 月 5 日之间接受眼科医生转诊推荐后利用和未利用 LVR 服务的患者(主要分析),并评估了 2016 年 9 月 1 日至 2021 年 4 月 2 日期间无论转诊状态如何的整体服务利用率(次要分析)。主要分析中的参与者是在美国一家学术医疗中心的大型眼科部门接受 LVR 转诊推荐的患者,这些推荐是根据 CDSS 警报做出的。次要分析包括在 CDSS 实施前后最佳记录视力(BDVA)差于 20/40 的患者。数据分析于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 4 月进行。

暴露

根据 CDSS 警报,主要分析中 LVR 服务转诊推荐的数量和位置;次要分析中 CDSS 的实际实施情况。

主要结果和措施

LVR 服务利用率的定义是在接受转诊的患者(主要分析)和 BDVA 差于 20/40 的患者(次要分析)中接受服务的患者数量。提取了患者人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族、民族)和眼科就诊特征(转诊推荐次数、就诊地点和 BDVA)的 EHR 数据。

结果

在 429 名(中位数[IQR]年龄,71[53 至 83]岁;233 名女性[54%])接受基于 CDSS 的转诊推荐的患者中,184 名(42.9%)利用了 LVR 服务。与未使用 LVR 的患者相比,使用者更有可能接受至少 2 次转诊推荐(12.5%比 6.1%;χ21=5.29;P=0.02),并且在有现场 LVR 服务的眼科就诊地点(87.5%比 78.0%;χ21=6.50;P=0.01)。调整患者人口统计学特征和其他转诊特征后,现场 LVR 服务(比值比,2.06;95%CI,1.18-3.61)仍然是唯一具有统计学意义的因素。在 CDSS 实施前后,无论转诊状态如何,BDVA 差于 20/40 的患者中,LVR 服务利用率分别为 6.1%、13.8%和 7.5%。

结论和相关性

在这项质量改进研究中,眼科医生的转诊推荐和患者接受其他眼科护理的就诊地点的现场 LVR 服务与服务利用率显著相关。眼科 CDSS 是实时应用临床指南以改善患者与医疗服务连接的有前途的工具。

相似文献

1
Low Vision Rehabilitation Service Utilization Before and After Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System in Ophthalmology.眼科临床决策支持系统实施前后低视力康复服务利用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254006. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54006.
2
Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology.利用电子临床决策支持来检查眼科的视功能康复转诊和实践指南。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 3;11(10):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.10.8.
3
Developing an Ophthalmology Clinical Decision Support System to Identify Patients for Low Vision Rehabilitation.开发眼科临床决策支持系统,以识别需要进行低视力康复的患者。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 1;10(3):24. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.3.24.
4
Low Vision Care - Out of Site. Out of Mind.低视力护理——视而不见。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;27(4):252-258. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2020.1717546. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Barriers to Low-Vision Rehabilitation Services for Visually Impaired Patients in a Multidisciplinary Ophthalmology Outpatient Practice.多学科眼科门诊中视力受损患者低视力康复服务的障碍
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 29;2021:6122246. doi: 10.1155/2021/6122246. eCollection 2021.
6
Provision and utilization of low-vision rehabilitation services in Toronto.多伦多低视力康复服务的提供与利用情况。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;42(5):698-702. doi: 10.3129/i07-124.
7
Development of a Cloud-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Ophthalmology Triage Using Decision Tree Artificial Intelligence.基于决策树人工智能的眼科分诊云临床决策支持系统的开发
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Oct 7;3(1):100231. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100231. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Association of Visual Acuity Improvement With Uncorrected Refractive Error in Patients New to Low Vision Clinics.新至低视力门诊患者的视力改善与未矫正屈光不正的相关性。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 1;138(7):765-771. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1677.
9
The Effect of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Clinical Decision Support System on Adherence to Clinical Protocols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care: Interrupted Time Series Study.基于电子病历的临床决策支持系统对炎症性肠病护理中临床方案依从性的影响:中断时间序列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 22;12:e55314. doi: 10.2196/55314.
10
Effectiveness of a Hospital-Based Computerized Decision Support System on Clinician Recommendations and Patient Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于医院的计算机化决策支持系统对临床医生推荐和患者结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917094. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17094.

引用本文的文献

1
Low Vision Rehabilitation Referral Characteristics for Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的低视力康复转诊特征
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;13(1):64. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010064.
2
Lived experience and lessons learned from the support of two secondary eye care units to improve cataract surgery and refractive services in two regions of Ethiopia: health system-strengthening support.从两个二级眼科护理单位提供支持以改善埃塞俄比亚两个地区白内障手术和屈光服务中获得的生活经验和教训:卫生系统强化支持
Int Health. 2025 Jul 1;17(4):431-439. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae074.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology.利用电子临床决策支持来检查眼科的视功能康复转诊和实践指南。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 3;11(10):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.10.8.
2
A systematic review on the effectiveness and impact of clinical decision support systems for breathlessness.系统评价呼吸困难临床决策支持系统的有效性和影响。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Aug 20;32(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00291-x.
3
Barriers to Low-Vision Rehabilitation Services for Visually Impaired Patients in a Multidisciplinary Ophthalmology Outpatient Practice.
Assessing Eye Clinic Accessibility: A Study Validating and Applying the SiteWise Survey.
评估眼科诊所的可达性:一项验证和应用 SiteWise 调查的研究。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):37. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.10.37.
多学科眼科门诊中视力受损患者低视力康复服务的障碍
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 29;2021:6122246. doi: 10.1155/2021/6122246. eCollection 2021.
4
Developing an Ophthalmology Clinical Decision Support System to Identify Patients for Low Vision Rehabilitation.开发眼科临床决策支持系统,以识别需要进行低视力康复的患者。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 1;10(3):24. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.3.24.
5
Interests and needs of eye care providers in clinical decision support for glaucoma.青光眼临床决策支持中眼科护理提供者的兴趣和需求。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 15;6(1):e000639. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000639. eCollection 2021.
6
A holistic model of low vision care for improving vision-related quality of life.一种改善与视力相关生活质量的低视力护理整体模型。
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Nov;103(6):733-741. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13054. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Low Vision Care - Out of Site. Out of Mind.低视力护理——视而不见。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;27(4):252-258. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2020.1717546. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
Rehabilitation Referral for Patients With Irreversible Vision Impairment Seen in a Public Safety-Net Eye Clinic.在公共安全网眼科诊所就诊的不可逆视力损害患者的康复转诊
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 1;136(4):400-408. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0241.
9
Effects of computerized decision support system implementations on patient outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review.计算机化决策支持系统实施对住院患者治疗结局的影响:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):593-602. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx100.
10
Accelerating Chart Review Using Automated Methods on Electronic Health Record Data for Postoperative Complications.利用电子健康记录数据的自动化方法加速术后并发症的图表审查。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1822-1831. eCollection 2016.