Institute of Gerontology, University of Vechta, Vechta, Germany.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 3;18(2):e0281354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281354. eCollection 2023.
Voluntary participation is thought to promote the well-being of engaged individuals, especially in old age, but prior evidence on this link is mixed. In the present studies, we used the cross-sectional data from Round 6 (2012) of the European Social Survey (ESS) to investigate the variation in the associations between voluntary participation and eudaimonic (e.g., sense of direction) and social (e.g., perceived social support) well-being across types of participation (nonpolitical volunteering vs. political participation), age groups, and European countries. Study 1 addressed individual-level associations and age differences therein (preregistered at https://osf.io/2p9sz and https://osf.io/6twqe). Two-level multiple regression with an extensive set of control variables showed that at the within-country level, the associations between voluntary participation and well-being indicators were small on average. Nonpolitical volunteering had significantly more positive effects than did political participation, whereas few significant age differences emerged. Study 2 focused on the country-level variables that might explain the substantial cross-national variation in the main effects of voluntary participation (preregistered at https://osf.io/mq3dx). Only GDP per capita was a significant moderator at the country level: The associations of nonpolitical volunteering with eudaimonic well-being were more positive in the European countries with lower GDP. Other country-level variables (Gini coefficient, social welfare spending, and democracy indices) yielded no consistent moderation effects. Study 3 considered potential country-level explanations for the substantial cross-national variation in whether younger or older adults appeared to benefit more (preregistered at https://osf.io/7ks45). None of the country-level variables considered (effective retirement age in men, life expectancy at 65, average age of members of the national parliament and cabinet, and youth unemployment rate) could account for this variation. We conclude that, given the large cross-national variation in the effects of voluntary participation on well-being and in age differences therein, more attention to national specifics is warranted.
自愿参与被认为可以促进参与个体的幸福感,尤其是在老年时期,但先前关于这种联系的证据存在差异。在本研究中,我们使用了欧洲社会调查(ESS)第六轮(2012 年)的横断面数据,调查了自愿参与与幸福的不同维度(如目标感)和社会维度(如感知社会支持)之间的关联在不同参与类型(非政治志愿服务与政治参与)、年龄组和欧洲国家之间的变化。研究 1 探讨了个体层面的关联及其年龄差异(在 https://osf.io/2p9sz 和 https://osf.io/6twqe 预先注册)。使用广泛的控制变量的两水平多重回归表明,在国内层面,自愿参与与幸福感指标之间的关联平均来说很小。非政治志愿服务的影响明显比政治参与更为积极,而年龄差异则不明显。研究 2 关注可能解释自愿参与的主要效应在跨国间存在显著差异的国家层面变量(在 https://osf.io/mq3dx 预先注册)。只有人均 GDP 是国家层面的显著调节变量:非政治志愿服务与精神幸福感的关联在人均 GDP 较低的欧洲国家更为积极。其他国家层面变量(基尼系数、社会福利支出和民主指数)没有产生一致的调节效应。研究 3 考虑了国家层面的潜在解释,这些解释可以说明在年轻人或老年人受益更多的跨国间显著差异(在 https://osf.io/7ks45 预先注册)。所考虑的国家层面变量(男性的有效退休年龄、65 岁时的预期寿命、国民议会和内阁成员的平均年龄以及青年失业率)都无法解释这种差异。我们的结论是,考虑到自愿参与对幸福感的影响以及其中年龄差异的跨国间存在很大差异,需要更加关注国家的具体情况。