The dual-process theory of moral judgment does not deny that people can make compromise judgments.
作者信息
Greene Joshua D
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 7;120(6):e2220396120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220396120. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The dual-process theory of moral judgment does not deny that people can make compromise judgments.道德判断的双加工理论并不否认人们能够做出折中的判断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 7;120(6):e2220396120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220396120. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Moral Judgments.道德判断。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:293-318. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
3
A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values.一个道德权衡系统产生直观的判断，这些判断是理性和一致的，在冲突的道德价值观之间取得平衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2214005119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214005119. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
4
Reply to Greene: No version of the dual process model can explain rational performance by people who made compromise moral judgments.对格林的回应：双重过程模型的任何版本都无法解释做出妥协道德判断的人的理性表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 13;120(24):e2220909120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220909120. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
No luck for moral luck.道德运气不眷顾。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:331-348. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
6
Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.牺牲功利主义判断确实反映了对更大利益的关注：通过过程分离和哲学家的判断进行澄清。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:241-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures.如何权衡生命。多结果结构中道德判断的计算模型。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104910. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104910. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
8
A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment.一种道德判断的主观功利主义理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1359-1381. doi: 10.1037/xge0000210. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
9
The development of intent-based moral judgment.基于意图的道德判断的发展。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):6-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
10
Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.毫无根据的惊愕：伤害和纯洁如何破坏道德惊愕的证据。
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:334-337. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
引用本文的文献
1
The meaning of ethical collaborative research according to young people.年轻人眼中道德协作研究的意义。
Int J Adolesc Youth. 2025 Jun 18;30(1):2517099. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2025.2517099. eCollection 2025.
2
Jurymen Seldom Rule Against a Person That They Like: The Relationship Between Emotions Towards a Defendant, the Understanding of Case Facts, and Juror Judgments in Civil Trials.陪审员很少会对他们喜欢的人做出不利裁决：民事审判中对被告的情感、对案件事实的理解与陪审员判决之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;15(7):965. doi: 10.3390/bs15070965.
3
Reply to Greene: No version of the dual process model can explain rational performance by people who made compromise moral judgments.对格林的回应：双重过程模型的任何版本都无法解释做出妥协道德判断的人的理性表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 13;120(24):e2220909120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220909120. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
本文引用的文献
1
A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values.一个道德权衡系统产生直观的判断，这些判断是理性和一致的，在冲突的道德价值观之间取得平衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2214005119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214005119. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.情境因素在文化多元化的样本中塑造了来自东方、南方和西方国家的人们在电车难题中的道德判断。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;6(6):880-895. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01319-5. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Integrative moral judgment: dissociating the roles of the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex.综合道德判断：分离杏仁核和腹内侧前额叶皮层的作用。
J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 26;34(13):4741-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3390-13.2014.
4
Finding faults: how moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure.发现错误：道德困境如何阐明认知结构。
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(3):269-79. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.614000. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
5
Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude.道德判断招募了领域通用的估值机制，以整合概率和大小的表示形式。
Neuron. 2010 Aug 26;67(4):667-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.020.
6
Pushing moral buttons: the interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment.触动道德按钮：个人力量与意图在道德判断中的相互作用
Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
7
An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.一项关于道德判断中情感参与的功能磁共振成像研究。
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872.
Zotero 插件