Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Quantitative Biomedical Sciences Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 3;25:e40308. doi: 10.2196/40308.
The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health worldwide and in the United States have been well documented. However, there is limited research examining the long-term effects of the pandemic on mental health, particularly in relation to pervasive policies such as statewide mask mandates and political party affiliation.
The goal of this study was to examine whether statewide mask mandates and political party affiliations yielded differential changes in mental health symptoms across the United States by leveraging state-specific internet search query data.
This study leveraged Google search queries from March 24, 2020, to March 29, 2021, in each of the 50 states in the United States. Of the 50 states, 39 implemented statewide mask mandates-with 16 of these states being Republican-to combat the spread of COVID-19. This study investigated whether mask mandates were associated differentially with mental health in states with and without mandates by exploring variations in mental health search queries across the United States. In addition, political party affiliation was examined as a potential covariate to determine whether mask mandates had differential associations with mental health in Republican and Democratic states. Generalized additive mixed models were implemented to model associations among mask mandates, political party affiliation, and mental health search volume for up to 7 months following the implementation of a mask mandate.
The results of generalized additive mixed models revealed that search volume for "restless" significantly increased following a mask mandate across all states, whereas the search volume for "irritable" and "anxiety" increased and decreased, respectively, following a mandate for Republican states in comparison with Democratic states. Most mental health search terms did not exhibit significant changes in search volume in relation to mask mandate implementation.
These findings suggest that mask mandates were associated nonlinearly with significant changes in mental health search behavior, with the most notable associations occurring in anxiety-related search terms. Therefore, policy makers should consider monitoring and providing additional support for these mental health symptoms following the implementation of public health-related mandates such as mask mandates. Nevertheless, these results do not provide evidence for an overwhelming impact of mask mandates on population-level mental health in the United States.
COVID-19 大流行对全球和美国的心理健康的影响已有大量记录。然而,关于大流行对心理健康的长期影响的研究有限,特别是在全州范围的口罩令和政党归属等普遍政策方面。
本研究旨在通过利用各州特定的互联网搜索查询数据,检查全州范围的口罩令和政党归属是否对美国的心理健康症状产生了不同的变化。
本研究利用了 2020 年 3 月 24 日至 2021 年 3 月 29 日美国 50 个州中每个州的谷歌搜索查询数据。在这 50 个州中,有 39 个州实施了全州范围的口罩令——其中 16 个州是共和党州——以控制 COVID-19 的传播。本研究通过探索美国各州之间的心理健康搜索查询的变化,研究了口罩令是否与没有口罩令的州的心理健康存在差异。此外,还研究了政党归属作为潜在协变量,以确定口罩令在共和党州和民主党州与心理健康的关联是否存在差异。实施广义加性混合模型来模拟口罩令、政党归属和口罩令实施后长达 7 个月的心理健康搜索量之间的关联。
广义加性混合模型的结果表明,在所有州中,口罩令实施后,“烦躁”的搜索量显著增加,而在与共和党州相比,民主党州的口罩令实施后,“易怒”和“焦虑”的搜索量分别增加和减少。大多数心理健康搜索词的搜索量与口罩令的实施没有显著变化。
这些发现表明,口罩令与心理健康搜索行为的显著变化呈非线性关联,最显著的关联发生在与焦虑相关的搜索词上。因此,政策制定者应考虑在实施公共卫生相关命令(如口罩令)后,监测和为这些心理健康症状提供额外支持。然而,这些结果并没有提供证据表明口罩令对美国人口心理健康产生了压倒性的影响。