Department of Hip & Knee Replacement Surgery - IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; B.A.R.I. (Bordeaux Arthroplasty Research Institute), France.
B.A.R.I. (Bordeaux Arthroplasty Research Institute), France; Clinique du Sport Bordeaux-Mérignac, France.
Knee. 2023 Mar;41:232-239. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Recent evidence has questioned the value of standing limb alignment for predicting the adduction moment and forces exerted on healthy and prosthetic knees. The purpose of this study was to assess the lower limb alignment of OA knee patients at various knee flexion angles. The main hypothesis was that lower limb alignment measured throughout knee flexion does not significantly differ between patients displaying different extension alignment (neutral, varus or valgus).
206 arthritic knee patients undergoing computer-assisted total (CAS) knee prosthesis were included. Frontal limb alignment was assessed in a systematic manner by CAS at three knee positions: extension, 90 degrees of flexion and maximal flexion. The HKA angle at each knee position and the change in HKA angle between two knee positions (delta value) were reported and compared.
A large proportion of OA patients had significant variation in their lower limb alignment (32% with Δ HKA > 5°). The extended limb deformity tended to reduce with knee flexion: mean of 5° and 6° deformity reduction for varus and valgus patients, 40% and 66% of varus and valgus patients progressed to neutral alignment with 90° knee flexion. Forty percent of neutral extended lower limb did not maintain their neutral alignment but rather progressed to either varus or valgus at 90° knee flexion.
Limb alignment in extension is a poor predictor of limb alignment in flexion in OA patients. Only considering the traditional frontal alignment of an extended lower limb for planning knee arthroplasty or osteotomy is likely insufficient.
最近的证据质疑了站立肢体对线在预测健康和假体膝关节内收力矩和受力方面的价值。本研究的目的是评估 OA 膝关节患者在不同膝关节屈曲角度下的下肢对线。主要假设是,在整个膝关节屈曲过程中测量的下肢对线在显示不同伸展对线(中立、内翻或外翻)的患者之间没有显著差异。
纳入了 206 例接受计算机辅助全膝关节假体(CAS)置换的关节炎膝关节患者。通过 CAS 在三个膝关节位置(伸展、90 度屈曲和最大屈曲)系统地评估额状面肢体对线。报告并比较了每个膝关节位置的 HKA 角度和两个膝关节位置之间 HKA 角度的变化(差值)。
很大一部分 OA 患者的下肢对线存在明显的变化(32%的患者 ΔHKA>5°)。随着膝关节的屈曲,伸展肢体的畸形往往会减少:内翻和外翻患者的平均畸形减少了 5°和 6°,40%和 66%的内翻和外翻患者在膝关节屈曲 90°时进展为中立对线。40%的中立伸展下肢不能保持中立对线,而是在膝关节屈曲 90°时进展为内翻或外翻。
伸展时的肢体对线是 OA 患者屈曲时肢体对线的不良预测指标。仅考虑伸展下肢的传统额状面对线来规划膝关节置换或截骨术可能是不够的。