Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Estonia.
Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Estonia.
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Feb;108:103471. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103471. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Progress in the science of consciousness depends on the experimental paradigms and varieties of contrastive analysis available to researchers. Here we highlight paradigms where the object is represented in consciousness as a set of its features but the interpretation of this set alternates in consciousness. We group experimental paradigms with this property under the label "conscious interpretation". We compare the paradigms studying conscious interpretation of the already consciously perceived objects with other types of experimental paradigms. We review previous and recent studies investigating this interpretative aspect of consciousness and propose future directions. We put forward the hypothesis that there are types of stimuli with a hierarchy of interpretations for which the rule applies: conscious experience is drawn towards higher-level interpretation and reverting back to the lower level of interpretation is impossible. We discuss how theories of consciousness might incorporate knowledge and constraints arising from the characteristics of conscious interpretation.
意识科学的进展取决于研究人员可用的实验范式和对比分析的种类。在这里,我们重点介绍了这样的范式,即对象在意识中被表示为一组其特征,但该集合的解释在意识中交替。我们将具有这种特性的实验范式归为“意识解释”。我们将研究已经在意识中感知到的对象的意识解释的范式与其他类型的实验范式进行了比较。我们回顾了以前和最近的研究,这些研究调查了意识的这种解释方面,并提出了未来的方向。我们提出了一个假设,即存在具有解释层次结构的刺激类型,对于这些刺激类型,规则适用:意识体验倾向于更高层次的解释,而回到较低层次的解释是不可能的。我们讨论了意识理论如何将来自意识解释特征的知识和约束纳入其中。