Suppr超能文献

接受阿普米司特或生物制剂治疗的银屑病患者的治疗模式和医疗保健费用:一项回顾性理赔数据库队列分析。

Treatment patterns and healthcare costs among patients with psoriasis initiating apremilast or biologics: a retrospective claims database cohort analysis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Real-World Analytics & Data Science (RADS), CORDS-CIF for Cardiovascular, Immunology and Fibrosis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Dermatolog Treat. 2023 Dec;34(1):2177095. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2177095.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare treatment patterns and healthcare costs for patients with psoriasis who initiate apremilast, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, or interleukin inhibitor.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used Optum Clinformatics Data Mart to identify propensity score-matched patients initiating apremilast, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, or interleukin inhibitors, with 12-month baseline and 24-month follow-up data. Switch, discontinuation, persistence, healthcare resource utilization, and total healthcare costs were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-month switch rates were highest for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (32%), followed by apremilast (21%) then interleukin inhibitors (14%). Mean (SD) per-patient-per-month costs for switchers were lowest for apremilast ($4213 [$2304]), higher for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors ($5274 [$2280]), and highest for interleukin inhibitors ($5539 [$2296];  < .001), primarily attributable to pharmacy costs: $3466 (apremilast), $4432 (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor), and $4721 (interleukin inhibitor).

LIMITATIONS

Psoriasis severity is absent from claims data; cost outcomes may be influenced by more severe psoriasis being more costly.

CONCLUSION

Switching psoriasis treatment is common and increases over time. Apremilast initiators had lower switch rates and costs compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, despite lower effectiveness reported in previous studies, perhaps indicating patient preference for oral treatment. Additional oral options may be desirable for this population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较开始使用阿普司特、肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂或白细胞介素抑制剂治疗的银屑病患者的治疗模式和医疗保健费用。

方法

本回顾性队列研究使用 Optum Clinformatics Data Mart 来识别倾向评分匹配的开始使用阿普司特、肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂或白细胞介素抑制剂的患者,这些患者具有 12 个月的基线数据和 24 个月的随访数据。评估了转换、停药、持续治疗、医疗资源利用和总医疗保健费用。

结果

肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的 24 个月转换率最高(32%),其次是阿普司特(21%),然后是白细胞介素抑制剂(14%)。转换患者的每位患者每月平均费用最低的是阿普司特($4213 [2304]),肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂较高($5274 [2280]),白细胞介素抑制剂最高($5539 [2296];<.001),主要归因于药房费用:$3466(阿普司特)、$4432(肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂)和$4721(白细胞介素抑制剂)。

局限性

索赔数据中没有银屑病严重程度的信息;成本结果可能受到更严重的银屑病成本更高的影响。

结论

转换银屑病治疗方案很常见,而且随着时间的推移而增加。尽管之前的研究报告称阿普司特的疗效较低,但与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂相比,开始使用阿普司特的患者的转换率和成本较低,这可能表明患者更喜欢口服治疗。对于这一人群,可能需要更多的口服选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验