• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证意外问题和多变量模型的开发。

Validation of the Surprise Question and the Development of a Multivariable Model.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care (M.D.), Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA.

Henry Hood Research Center (E.V., A.Y.), Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.015
PMID:36736500
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Surprise Question (SQ) (would you be surprised if this patient died within a year?) is a prognostic variable explored in chronic illnesses. Validation is limited to sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective is to validate the SQ in cancer patients and develop a predictive model with additional variables.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of adult (age>18) cancer patients seen between October 1, 2019, through March 31, 2021, undergoing systemic therapies had the SQ completed by oncologists prior to each change in systemic therapy. The primary outcome was survival for one year. Secondary outcomes were predictions of survival at three, six, and nine months. Patients were grouped into negative SQ (not surprised) and positive SQ (surprised). Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated for the SQ. Additional prognostic variables were age, gender, cancer stage, line of therapy, Charleson Comorbid Index (CCI), palliative care consultation (prior to, after the SQ, or not at all), and healthcare utilization (outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department (ED). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used for discrimination and modeling. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare the model fit as each predictor.

RESULTS

1366 patients had 1 SQ; 784 died within a year. The SQ predicted survival at one year (P = 0.008), with a positive LR of 1.459 (95%CI 1.316-1.602) and a c-statistic of 0.565 (95%CI 0.530-0.600). Additional variables increased the c-statistic to 0.648 (95% CI 0.608-0.686). The total model best predicted survival at three months, c-statistic of 0.663 (95% CI 0.616-0.706). However, the total model c-statistic remained <0.70.

CONCLUSIONS

The SQ, as a single factor, poorly predicts survival and should not be used to alter therapies. Adding additional objective variables improved prognostication, but further refinement and external validation are needed.

摘要

背景

惊讶问题(SQ)(如果这个患者在一年内去世,你会感到惊讶吗?)是在慢性病中探索的预后变量。验证仅限于敏感性、特异性和预测值。

目的

我们的目的是验证癌症患者中的 SQ,并开发一个具有附加变量的预测模型。

方法

对 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间接受系统治疗的成年(年龄>18 岁)癌症患者进行前瞻性队列研究,在每次改变系统治疗前由肿瘤学家完成 SQ。主要结局是一年的生存率。次要结局是三个月、六个月和九个月的生存预测。将患者分为 SQ 阴性(不惊讶)和 SQ 阳性(惊讶)组。计算 SQ 的敏感性、特异性、预测值和似然比(LR)。附加的预后变量包括年龄、性别、癌症分期、治疗线数、Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)、姑息治疗咨询(在 SQ 之前、之后或根本没有)和医疗保健利用(门诊、住院和急诊部(ED)。使用逻辑回归和接收者操作特征(ROC)进行区分和建模。Akaike 信息准则(AIC)用于比较每个预测因子的模型拟合度。

结果

1366 例患者进行了 1 次 SQ;784 例患者在一年内死亡。SQ 预测一年生存率(P = 0.008),阳性 LR 为 1.459(95%CI 1.316-1.602),C 统计量为 0.565(95%CI 0.530-0.600)。其他变量将 C 统计量提高到 0.648(95%CI 0.608-0.686)。总模型最能预测三个月时的生存率,C 统计量为 0.663(95%CI 0.616-0.706)。然而,总模型的 C 统计量仍低于 0.70。

结论

SQ 作为单一因素,对生存率的预测能力较差,不应用于改变治疗方案。添加其他客观变量可以改善预后,但需要进一步改进和外部验证。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Surprise Question and the Development of a Multivariable Model.验证意外问题和多变量模型的开发。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.在急诊科有晚期癌症的患者中,意外问题和表现状态提示了舒缓治疗需求的紧迫性:一项观察性队列研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
3
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.“惊讶问题”可用于识别急诊科中需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
A comparison of palliative care and rapid emergency screening (P-CaRES) tool, broad and narrow criteria, and surprise questions to predict survival of older emergency department patients.姑息治疗与快速紧急筛查(P-CaRES)工具、广泛和狭义标准以及意外问题在预测老年急诊科患者生存方面的比较。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 27;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01205-5.
5
How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?“惊讶问题”预测 COPD 患者 1 年死亡率的效果如何?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2656-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.护士使用惊讶问题识别住院老年患者 12 个月死亡率的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
7
The prognostic value of the 12-, 6-, 3- and 1-month 'Surprise Question' in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals.12 个月、6 个月、3 个月和 1 个月“意外问题”对癌症患者预后的预测价值:三所医院的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13551. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13551. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
8
Development of a Clinical Prediction Model for 1-Year Mortality in Patients With Advanced Cancer.开发一种用于预测晚期癌症患者 1 年死亡率的临床预测模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2244350. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44350.
9
Enhancing Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Through Simple Prognostication Tools: A Comparison of the Surprise Question, the Number of Previous Heart Failure Hospitalizations, and the Seattle Heart Failure Model for Predicting 1-Year Survival.通过简单的预后工具加强晚期心力衰竭患者的姑息治疗:“意外问题”、既往心力衰竭住院次数与西雅图心力衰竭模型预测1年生存率的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 11;9:836237. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.836237. eCollection 2022.
10
Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.急诊医生评估死亡率与老年住院患者 1 个月实际死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11139.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Clinician Estimates versus a Statistical Tool for Predicting Risk of Death within 45 Days of Admission for Cancer Patients.比较临床医生的估计与统计工具,以预测癌症患者入院后 45 天内的死亡风险。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):489-500. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787185. Epub 2024 Jun 26.