• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“惊讶问题”预测 COPD 患者 1 年死亡率的效果如何?

How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2656-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8
PMID:33409886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8390592/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often receive burdensome care at end-of-life (EOL) and infrequently complete advance care planning (ACP). The surprise question (SQ) is a prognostic tool that may facilitate ACP.

OBJECTIVE

To assess how well the SQ predicts mortality and prompts ACP for COPD patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Patients admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of COPD between July 2015 and September 2018.

MAIN MEASURES

Emergency department (ED) and inpatient clinicians answered, "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 30 days (ED)/one year (inpatient)?" The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of the SQ in predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality. The secondary outcome was the correlation between SQ and ACP (palliative care consultation, documented goals-of-care conversation, change in code status, or completion of ACP document).

KEY RESULTS

The 30-day SQ had a high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting 30-day mortality: sensitivity 12%, specificity 95%, PPV 11%, and NPV 96%. The 1-year SQ demonstrated better accuracy for predicting 1-year mortality: sensitivity 47%, specificity 75%, PPV 35%, and NPV 83%. After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and prior 6-month admissions, 1-year SQ+ responses were associated with greater odds of 1-year mortality (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.39-4.08) versus SQ-. One-year SQ+ patients were more likely to have a goals-of-care conversation (25% vs. 11%, p < 0.01) and complete an advance directive or POLST (46% vs. 23%, p < 0.01). After multivariable adjustment, SQ+ responses to the 1-year SQ were associated with greater odds of ACP receipt (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.64-4.36).

CONCLUSIONS

The 1-year surprise question may be an effective component of prognostication and advance care planning for COPD patients in the inpatient setting.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在生命末期(EOL)经常接受负担沉重的护理,并且很少完成预先护理计划(ACP)。意外问题(SQ)是一种预测工具,可以促进 ACP。

目的

评估 SQ 预测 COPD 患者死亡率和提示 ACP 的能力。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

受试者

2015 年 7 月至 2018 年 9 月期间因 COPD 急性加重而住院的患者。

主要措施

急诊科(ED)和住院医生回答“如果这个患者在接下来的 30 天(ED)/1 年(住院)内死亡,你会感到惊讶吗?”主要结局指标是 SQ 预测 30 天和 1 年死亡率的准确性。次要结局是 SQ 与 ACP(姑息治疗咨询、记录的目标治疗对话、改变代码状态或完成 ACP 文档)之间的相关性。

主要结果

30 天 SQ 对预测 30 天死亡率具有高特异性但低敏感性:敏感性 12%,特异性 95%,PPV 11%,NPV 96%。1 年 SQ 对预测 1 年死亡率的准确性更好:敏感性 47%,特异性 75%,PPV 35%,NPV 83%。在调整年龄、性别和前 6 个月入院后,1 年 SQ+应答与 1 年死亡率的更高几率相关(OR 2.38,95%CI 1.39-4.08),而 SQ-则相反。1 年 SQ+患者更有可能进行目标治疗对话(25%对 11%,p < 0.01),并完成预先指示或 POLST(46%对 23%,p < 0.01)。在多变量调整后,1 年 SQ 的 SQ+应答与 ACP 接受的更高几率相关(OR 2.67,95%CI 1.64-4.36)。

结论

1 年意外问题可能是 COPD 患者住院期间预测和预先护理计划的有效组成部分。

相似文献

1
How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?“惊讶问题”预测 COPD 患者 1 年死亡率的效果如何?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2656-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
External Validation and User Experiences of the ProPal-COPD Tool to Identify the Palliative Phase in COPD.ProPal-COPD 工具在 COPD 患者进入终末期阶段识别中的外部验证和用户体验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Dec 22;17:3129-3138. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S387716. eCollection 2022.
3
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.在急诊科有晚期癌症的患者中,意外问题和表现状态提示了舒缓治疗需求的紧迫性:一项观察性队列研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
COPD patients in need of palliative care: Identification after hospitalization through the surprise question.需要姑息治疗的 COPD 患者:通过“惊讶问题”在住院后进行识别。
Chron Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;16:1479972318796219. doi: 10.1177/1479972318796219. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
5
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.护士使用惊讶问题识别住院老年患者 12 个月死亡率的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.急诊医生评估死亡率与老年住院患者 1 个月实际死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11139.
7
Validation of the Surprise Question and the Development of a Multivariable Model.验证意外问题和多变量模型的开发。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
8
Using the Surprise Question To Identify Those with Unmet Palliative Care Needs in Emergency and Inpatient Settings: What Do Clinicians Think?在急诊和住院环境中使用惊喜问题识别未满足的姑息治疗需求者:临床医生怎么看?
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):729-735. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0403. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.“惊讶问题”可用于识别急诊科中需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
Use of Advance Care Planning Billing Codes for Hospitalized Older Adults at High Risk of Dying: A National Observational Study.针对高死亡风险住院老年患者使用预先护理计划计费代码:一项全国性观察性研究。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Apr;14(4):229-231. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3150.

引用本文的文献

1
The surprise question: predictive accuracy in an unselected emergency department population - a prospective study in nurses and physicians.突发问题:未选择的急诊科人群中的预测准确性——一项针对护士和医生的前瞻性研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2529575. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2529575. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Accuracy of the "Surprise Question" in predicting 90-day mortality among hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis.“意外问题”在预测失代偿期肝硬化住院患者90天死亡率中的准确性。
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Jul 14;9(8). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000773. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
3
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
4
Best Practices in End of Life and Palliative Care in the Emergency Department.急诊中的临终关怀和姑息治疗最佳实践。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):575-597. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
5
External Validation and User Experiences of the ProPal-COPD Tool to Identify the Palliative Phase in COPD.ProPal-COPD 工具在 COPD 患者进入终末期阶段识别中的外部验证和用户体验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Dec 22;17:3129-3138. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S387716. eCollection 2022.
6
The utility of the surprise question: A useful tool for identifying patients nearing the last phase of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“惊讶问题”的实用性:识别生命末期患者的有用工具?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1023-1046. doi: 10.1177/02692163221099116.
7
Comparison of characteristics and management of emergency department presentations between patients with met and unmet palliative care needs.比较有和没有得到缓和医疗需求满足的急诊患者的特征和处理方式。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 27;16(9):e0257501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257501. eCollection 2021.
8
The 'Surprise question' in heart failure: a prospective cohort study.心力衰竭中的“意外问题”:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 21;14(1):68-75. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003143.
9
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Prognostication in Oncology, Dementia, Frailty, and Pulmonary Diseases.肿瘤科、痴呆症、虚弱和肺部疾病预后预测:临床医生应该知道的十大要点。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;24(9):1391-1397. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0327. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.急诊医生评估死亡率与老年住院患者 1 个月实际死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11139.
2
Do We Know What We Mean? An Examination of the Use of the Phrase "Goals of Care" in the Literature.我们知道自己的意思吗?对文献中“治疗目标”一词使用情况的考察。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;22(12):1546-1552. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0059. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
3
Association of platelet count with all-cause mortality and risk of cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity in stable COPD.血小板计数与稳定期 COPD 患者全因死亡率及心血管和呼吸系统发病风险的相关性。
Respir Res. 2019 May 8;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1059-1.
4
Prognostic value of a modified surprise question designed for use in the emergency department setting.一种专为急诊科设计的改良型意外问题的预后价值。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;6(1):70-76. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.293. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.“惊讶问题”可用于识别急诊科中需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
6
Space for intuition - the 'Surprise'-Question in haemato-oncology: Qualitative analysis of experiences and perceptions of haemato-oncologists.给直觉留些空间——肿瘤血液学中的“意外”之问:肿瘤血液学家的经验和看法的定性分析。
Palliat Med. 2019 May;33(5):531-540. doi: 10.1177/0269216318824271. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study.使用“Surprise Question”预测心力衰竭患者一年死亡率:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1353. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
8
COPD patients in need of palliative care: Identification after hospitalization through the surprise question.需要姑息治疗的 COPD 患者:通过“惊讶问题”在住院后进行识别。
Chron Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;16:1479972318796219. doi: 10.1177/1479972318796219. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
9
Professionals' perceptions and current practices of integrated palliative care in chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study in Belgium.专业人员对慢性心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中综合姑息治疗的认知和当前实践:比利时的一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Aug 24;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0356-7.
10
Factors Contributing To Geographic Variation In End-Of-Life Expenditures For Cancer Patients.导致癌症患者临终支出存在地域差异的因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1136-1143. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0015.